Simulation of large earthquake synchronization and implications on North Anatolian fault zone

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
E. Sopacı , A.A. Özacar
{"title":"Simulation of large earthquake synchronization and implications on North Anatolian fault zone","authors":"E. Sopacı ,&nbsp;A.A. Özacar","doi":"10.1016/j.tecto.2025.230902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) zone has consistently exhibited a sequence of westward-migrating earthquakes with magnitudes exceeding 7 (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub><mo>&gt;</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span>) during its last three seismic cycles. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this behavior, we conducted multi-cycle simulations using a rate-and-state friction (RSF) model. The model incorporates three seismogenic asperities aligned along the fault strike, separated by barriers that inhibit rupture propagation. By simulating spontaneously occurring earthquakes, we analyzed variations in the timing of large events across the asperities. Our results indicate that both the strength and length of the barriers play a critical role in controlling the coupling between asperities, while variations in asperity length exert a relatively minor influence. Simulations with very weak barriers—permitting rupture jumps between asperities—and very strong barriers—limiting stress transfer—tended to produce synchronized earthquake cycles. In contrast, intermediate-strength barriers that allowed limited stress transfer generated more variable, non-synchronized cycles. These findings suggest that faults coupled primarily through static stress transfer are more prone to desynchronization, whereas those coupled via dynamic triggering or afterslip may maintain synchronization over multiple cycles. Although the model is simplified, it offers meaningful insights into the seismic behavior of the NAF and contributes to a deeper understanding of fault system dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22257,"journal":{"name":"Tectonophysics","volume":"914 ","pages":"Article 230902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195125002884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) zone has consistently exhibited a sequence of westward-migrating earthquakes with magnitudes exceeding 7 (Mw>7) during its last three seismic cycles. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this behavior, we conducted multi-cycle simulations using a rate-and-state friction (RSF) model. The model incorporates three seismogenic asperities aligned along the fault strike, separated by barriers that inhibit rupture propagation. By simulating spontaneously occurring earthquakes, we analyzed variations in the timing of large events across the asperities. Our results indicate that both the strength and length of the barriers play a critical role in controlling the coupling between asperities, while variations in asperity length exert a relatively minor influence. Simulations with very weak barriers—permitting rupture jumps between asperities—and very strong barriers—limiting stress transfer—tended to produce synchronized earthquake cycles. In contrast, intermediate-strength barriers that allowed limited stress transfer generated more variable, non-synchronized cycles. These findings suggest that faults coupled primarily through static stress transfer are more prone to desynchronization, whereas those coupled via dynamic triggering or afterslip may maintain synchronization over multiple cycles. Although the model is simplified, it offers meaningful insights into the seismic behavior of the NAF and contributes to a deeper understanding of fault system dynamics.
北安纳托利亚断裂带大地震同步化模拟及其意义
北安纳托利亚断裂带(NAF)在近3个地震旋回中,连续出现一系列震级超过7级的西向迁移地震。为了研究这种行为背后的机制,我们使用速率和状态摩擦(RSF)模型进行了多周期模拟。该模型包含了沿断层走向排列的三个发震岩石,它们被抑制破裂传播的屏障隔开。通过模拟自发发生的地震,我们分析了大事件发生时间的变化。研究结果表明,障壁的强度和长度对凹凸不平耦合的控制起关键作用,而凹凸不平长度的变化对其影响相对较小。用非常弱的屏障(允许岩石之间的破裂跳跃)和非常强的屏障(限制应力传递)进行模拟,往往会产生同步的地震循环。相比之下,允许有限应力传递的中等强度屏障产生了更多可变的非同步循环。这些发现表明,主要通过静态应力传递耦合的断层更容易发生不同步,而通过动态触发或后滑耦合的断层可能在多个旋回中保持同步。虽然模型被简化了,但它对NAF的地震行为提供了有意义的见解,有助于更深入地了解断层系统动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tectonophysics
Tectonophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid arth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信