Rainfall amount shapes the soil erosion and vegetation protection effectiveness in soil conservation

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Xinyu Zhang , Shouhong Zhang , Fan Zhang , Jingyi Shi , Jingqiu Chen
{"title":"Rainfall amount shapes the soil erosion and vegetation protection effectiveness in soil conservation","authors":"Xinyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Shouhong Zhang ,&nbsp;Fan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingyi Shi ,&nbsp;Jingqiu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rainfall is a primary driving force of soil and water loss. However, the impacts of increasing rainfall amount (RA) on slope soil erosion are obscure, calling for a detailed integrated assessment. In particular, the relationship between dynamic RA and vegetation protection effectiveness remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study conducted a <em>meta</em>-analysis of 40 studies, representing 1,630 rainfall events and the associated runoff (R) and soil loss (S), collected from runoff plots across various regions of China up to the year 2023. Among these, 68.59% of the rainfall events occurred in the northern rocky mountainous region and the Loess Plateau, while 72.58% were recorded on Semi-alfisols and Amorphic soil. The runoff plots included grassland, shrubland, forest, and bare land, with RA ranging from light rain to downpours. The results indicated that increasing RA significantly promoted soil erosion and increased the slope erosion sensitivity. The weighted average runoff (WR) and the weighted average soil loss (WS) produced by downpours reached 12.06 and 11.16 times those produced by light to moderate rain, respectively. The weighted average runoff coefficient (WRC) increased from 0.24 to 0.41 as RA rose, while the weighted average sediment coefficient (WSC) from torrential rain to downpours was higher than from light to heavy rain. The vegetation protection effectiveness was influenced by both vegetation type and RA. Vegetation was more effective in controlling S than R. The effectiveness of vegetation in reducing runoff declined with increasing RA. Its ability to reduce erosion initially decreased and then increased dfrom light to torrential rain. Forest significantly reduced soil erosion and inhibited the linear relationship between ‘ln(RA)-ln(R)-ln(S)’. Additionally, this study presents a rainfall event classification based on soil loss tolerance and emphasizes that vegetation protection effectiveness is not equivalent to soil loss tolerance, thereby providing scientific support for regional soil and water conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134219"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425015574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rainfall is a primary driving force of soil and water loss. However, the impacts of increasing rainfall amount (RA) on slope soil erosion are obscure, calling for a detailed integrated assessment. In particular, the relationship between dynamic RA and vegetation protection effectiveness remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study conducted a meta-analysis of 40 studies, representing 1,630 rainfall events and the associated runoff (R) and soil loss (S), collected from runoff plots across various regions of China up to the year 2023. Among these, 68.59% of the rainfall events occurred in the northern rocky mountainous region and the Loess Plateau, while 72.58% were recorded on Semi-alfisols and Amorphic soil. The runoff plots included grassland, shrubland, forest, and bare land, with RA ranging from light rain to downpours. The results indicated that increasing RA significantly promoted soil erosion and increased the slope erosion sensitivity. The weighted average runoff (WR) and the weighted average soil loss (WS) produced by downpours reached 12.06 and 11.16 times those produced by light to moderate rain, respectively. The weighted average runoff coefficient (WRC) increased from 0.24 to 0.41 as RA rose, while the weighted average sediment coefficient (WSC) from torrential rain to downpours was higher than from light to heavy rain. The vegetation protection effectiveness was influenced by both vegetation type and RA. Vegetation was more effective in controlling S than R. The effectiveness of vegetation in reducing runoff declined with increasing RA. Its ability to reduce erosion initially decreased and then increased dfrom light to torrential rain. Forest significantly reduced soil erosion and inhibited the linear relationship between ‘ln(RA)-ln(R)-ln(S)’. Additionally, this study presents a rainfall event classification based on soil loss tolerance and emphasizes that vegetation protection effectiveness is not equivalent to soil loss tolerance, thereby providing scientific support for regional soil and water conservation.
在土壤保持中,降雨量决定了土壤侵蚀和植被保护的效果
降雨是水土流失的主要驱动力。然而,降雨量增加对坡面土壤侵蚀的影响尚不明确,需要详细的综合评价。特别是,动态RA与植被保护效果之间的关系尚不清楚。因此,本研究对40项研究进行了荟萃分析,涉及1630个降雨事件及其相关的径流(R)和土壤流失(S),这些研究收集自中国不同地区的径流地块,截止到2023年。其中,68.59%的降水事件发生在北部岩质山区和黄土高原,72.58%的降水事件发生在半溶质土和变质土上。径流地块包括草地、灌木地、森林和裸地,RA从小雨到倾盆大雨不等。结果表明,RA的增加显著促进了土壤侵蚀,增加了坡面侵蚀敏感性。降雨产生的加权平均径流量(WR)和加权平均土壤流失量(WS)分别是小雨至中雨产生的12.06和11.16倍。随着RA的升高,加权平均径流系数(WRC)由0.24增加到0.41,而暴雨到暴雨的加权平均泥沙系数(WSC)高于小雨到暴雨的加权平均泥沙系数(WSC)。植被保护效果受植被类型和RA的共同影响。植被对S的控制效果优于r,植被减少径流的效果随RA的增加而下降。它减少侵蚀的能力最初下降,然后从小雨增加到暴雨。森林显著减少了土壤侵蚀,抑制了ln(RA)-ln(R)-ln(S)的线性关系。提出了基于水土流失容忍度的降雨事件分类方法,强调植被保护效果不等于水土流失容忍度,为区域水土保持提供科学支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信