{"title":"Assessing the impacts of selective logging on the forest canopy in the Amazon using airborne LiDAR","authors":"Leilson Ferreira , Edilson Bias , Joaquim J. Sousa , Eraldo Matricardi , Luís Pádua","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring the impacts of selective logging in tropical forests remains challenging due to the reliance on labor intensive field surveys. This study relies on the use of pre- and post-logging airborne LiDAR data to provide a precise and scalable method for quantifying canopy disturbances, carried out within the Sustainable Management Plan for the Jamari National Forest in Rondônia. The analysis of the airborne LiDAR data revealed a significant increase in canopy gaps after logging (<span><math><mrow><mi>F</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>63</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>), with canopy gaps corresponding to an average increase of 3.9 ± 0.4% relative to the total plot area due to logging activities. The mean canopy gap area per felled tree was 158.29 m<sup>2</sup> (<span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 35.7). A strong positive correlation was found between canopy gaps that emerged after logging and the logged AGB (18.4 ± 1.7 <span><math><mrow><mi>Mg</mi><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>ha</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>). A significant reduction in mean canopy height was also observed, decreasing from 26.26 ± 0.40 m before logging to 24.62 ± 0.33 m after logging (<span><math><mrow><mi>F</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>9</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>86</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>005</mn></mrow></math></span>). The mean canopy gap area shifted from 40.68 ± 2.30 m<sup>2</sup> to 77.07 ± 2.82 m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, there was an increase of 14.6% in the total number of gaps. The average Gini coefficient was 0.50 ± 0.02 before logging and 0.64 ± 0.01 in the post-logging areas and the average total impact on the canopy was 16.6 ± 1.5% of the selectively logged area. The results obtained using the proposed methodology were consistent with field observations, demonstrating high accuracy of LiDAR-detected impacts when compared with inventory and GNSS data. This high detection rate highlights the sensitivity of LiDAR point cloud data in capturing small structural changes. Compared to pre-logging conditions, the observed alterations demonstrate that LiDAR provides a more precise and scalable approach for quantifying the impact of selective logging on forest structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500622X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Monitoring the impacts of selective logging in tropical forests remains challenging due to the reliance on labor intensive field surveys. This study relies on the use of pre- and post-logging airborne LiDAR data to provide a precise and scalable method for quantifying canopy disturbances, carried out within the Sustainable Management Plan for the Jamari National Forest in Rondônia. The analysis of the airborne LiDAR data revealed a significant increase in canopy gaps after logging (, ), with canopy gaps corresponding to an average increase of 3.9 ± 0.4% relative to the total plot area due to logging activities. The mean canopy gap area per felled tree was 158.29 m2 ( 35.7). A strong positive correlation was found between canopy gaps that emerged after logging and the logged AGB (18.4 ± 1.7 ). A significant reduction in mean canopy height was also observed, decreasing from 26.26 ± 0.40 m before logging to 24.62 ± 0.33 m after logging (, ). The mean canopy gap area shifted from 40.68 ± 2.30 m2 to 77.07 ± 2.82 m2. Furthermore, there was an increase of 14.6% in the total number of gaps. The average Gini coefficient was 0.50 ± 0.02 before logging and 0.64 ± 0.01 in the post-logging areas and the average total impact on the canopy was 16.6 ± 1.5% of the selectively logged area. The results obtained using the proposed methodology were consistent with field observations, demonstrating high accuracy of LiDAR-detected impacts when compared with inventory and GNSS data. This high detection rate highlights the sensitivity of LiDAR point cloud data in capturing small structural changes. Compared to pre-logging conditions, the observed alterations demonstrate that LiDAR provides a more precise and scalable approach for quantifying the impact of selective logging on forest structure.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.