Chi Zhao , Siyang Zhang , Zherui Zhang , Yecheng Lyu
{"title":"Deriving workload from driving behavior and psycho-physiology in work zones","authors":"Chi Zhao , Siyang Zhang , Zherui Zhang , Yecheng Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to atypical driving scenarios, work zones may increase driving uncertainty, elevate behavioral deviations and intensify psychological workload, potentially pose risks and even lead to crashes. Existing studies predominantly focus on regular scenarios, traditional models and theories, which are not able to explain work zone driving behaviors and psycho-physiology due to different driving environment and complexity. This study aims to better understand the dynamic interaction among work zone driving behavior, driver psychology and physiology, so as to develop an interpretable workload representation framework. A driving simulator study with one baseline and three work zone scenarios was conducted, along with the collection of driving behavior, physiological data, and post-simulator survey data. Sixteen features were inputted to Optuna framework for Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, then a stacking ensemble learning model was built to identify workload levels, with a 93.14% accuracy, excessing other ten machine learning models including Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Neural Networks. Workload correlations with driving behavior and psycho-physiology were analyzed and visualized through SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method. Significantly higher workload is characterized by greater lateral position shifts, more frequent brake pedal utilization, higher heart rate, lower heart rate variability, and more often changes in pupil diameter and gaze position. The results of this study reveal the dynamic relationships among driving behavior, driver psychology and physiology under different work zone setups, which could provide clearer insight for the design and optimization of driver assistance and autonomous driving systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108240"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to atypical driving scenarios, work zones may increase driving uncertainty, elevate behavioral deviations and intensify psychological workload, potentially pose risks and even lead to crashes. Existing studies predominantly focus on regular scenarios, traditional models and theories, which are not able to explain work zone driving behaviors and psycho-physiology due to different driving environment and complexity. This study aims to better understand the dynamic interaction among work zone driving behavior, driver psychology and physiology, so as to develop an interpretable workload representation framework. A driving simulator study with one baseline and three work zone scenarios was conducted, along with the collection of driving behavior, physiological data, and post-simulator survey data. Sixteen features were inputted to Optuna framework for Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, then a stacking ensemble learning model was built to identify workload levels, with a 93.14% accuracy, excessing other ten machine learning models including Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Neural Networks. Workload correlations with driving behavior and psycho-physiology were analyzed and visualized through SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method. Significantly higher workload is characterized by greater lateral position shifts, more frequent brake pedal utilization, higher heart rate, lower heart rate variability, and more often changes in pupil diameter and gaze position. The results of this study reveal the dynamic relationships among driving behavior, driver psychology and physiology under different work zone setups, which could provide clearer insight for the design and optimization of driver assistance and autonomous driving systems.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.