Nimali Lakmini Munasinghe , Gerard O'Reilly , Peter Cameron , Sunil De Alwis , Don Athula Bernard Dangalle , Millawage Supun Dilara Wijesinghe
{"title":"Evaluating the current status of disaster-preparedness in a subset of Sri Lankan hospitals using a novel tool (pilot, validation, and implementation)","authors":"Nimali Lakmini Munasinghe , Gerard O'Reilly , Peter Cameron , Sunil De Alwis , Don Athula Bernard Dangalle , Millawage Supun Dilara Wijesinghe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The absence of a standardised tool for the Sri Lankan context has hampered local hospitals’ disaster preparedness. This research team newly developed an all-hazards tool comprising 142 indicators across 15 themes, with local expert consensus ensuring face and content validity. Present study aimed to further test its validity, reliability, and feasibility and to assess the preparedness of selected hospitals using this tool.</div><div>This cross-sectional pilot study was conducted online in 16 government hospitals from March to April 2023 in Sri Lanka. Two independent raters in each hospital ranked the hospital's disaster preparedness for each indicator on a five-point Likert scale ranging from excellent to poor. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were assessed using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha, respectively.</div><div>The findings revealed specific gaps and strengths across the assessed hospitals. The preparedness improves as the hospital hierarchy advances, supporting the tool's construct validity. Accessibility and triage themes predominated in those hospitals with satisfactory preparedness, compared with chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives (CBRNE) readiness, post-disaster recovery and mortuary capacities. Gaps were noted in fire safety preparedness, psychological support for staff and emergency purchasing arrangements. The tool demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency across all 15 themes, with acceptable inter-rater reliability in nearly all hospitals. This validated and feasible tool enhances context-specific disaster preparedness assessments and provides actionable insights to inform policy development and future research. Health authorities may use this tool for countrywide assessments, guiding resource allocation, and enhancing the resilience of hospitals to future disasters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The absence of a standardised tool for the Sri Lankan context has hampered local hospitals’ disaster preparedness. This research team newly developed an all-hazards tool comprising 142 indicators across 15 themes, with local expert consensus ensuring face and content validity. Present study aimed to further test its validity, reliability, and feasibility and to assess the preparedness of selected hospitals using this tool.
This cross-sectional pilot study was conducted online in 16 government hospitals from March to April 2023 in Sri Lanka. Two independent raters in each hospital ranked the hospital's disaster preparedness for each indicator on a five-point Likert scale ranging from excellent to poor. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were assessed using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha, respectively.
The findings revealed specific gaps and strengths across the assessed hospitals. The preparedness improves as the hospital hierarchy advances, supporting the tool's construct validity. Accessibility and triage themes predominated in those hospitals with satisfactory preparedness, compared with chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives (CBRNE) readiness, post-disaster recovery and mortuary capacities. Gaps were noted in fire safety preparedness, psychological support for staff and emergency purchasing arrangements. The tool demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency across all 15 themes, with acceptable inter-rater reliability in nearly all hospitals. This validated and feasible tool enhances context-specific disaster preparedness assessments and provides actionable insights to inform policy development and future research. Health authorities may use this tool for countrywide assessments, guiding resource allocation, and enhancing the resilience of hospitals to future disasters.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.