A performance-based NaTech risk assessment methodology for hydrocarbon pipelines subjected to landslides

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fabrizio Paolacci , Daniele Corritore , Stefano Caprinozzi , Iacopo Borsi , Maria Giulia Sotgiu , Michele Bonuccelli , Marcello Mancini , Vito Tonetto
{"title":"A performance-based NaTech risk assessment methodology for hydrocarbon pipelines subjected to landslides","authors":"Fabrizio Paolacci ,&nbsp;Daniele Corritore ,&nbsp;Stefano Caprinozzi ,&nbsp;Iacopo Borsi ,&nbsp;Maria Giulia Sotgiu ,&nbsp;Michele Bonuccelli ,&nbsp;Marcello Mancini ,&nbsp;Vito Tonetto","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distributed gas and oil pipelines often cross areas prone to landslides. According to the Eu Directive 2012/18/UE, known also as Seveso III, the risk to people and community served by the pipeline should be assessed. If the need is clear, the state of the art on available methods to solve this peculiar problem is limited. Methods to calculate NaTech risk according to a performance-based approach have already been proposed, especially for hazardous plants like refineries and oil &amp; gas plant. Differently, a few similar approaches have been used for estimating the risk of consequences generated by a hydrocarbon material release from a pipeline subjected to landslide. In this paper a performance-based methodology to assess the mean annual frequency of release from pipelines for the transportation of hydrocarbons subjected to a landslide is proposed. This methodology employs the hazard curves of landslides, and the fragility curves of the pipelines defined in terms of permanent ground deformation. The content release is evaluated by using mechanical response quantities as local deformation as suggested in the literature. The proposed approach is validated through a representative case study of a pipeline for the transportation of oil crossing in a mountain region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105774"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distributed gas and oil pipelines often cross areas prone to landslides. According to the Eu Directive 2012/18/UE, known also as Seveso III, the risk to people and community served by the pipeline should be assessed. If the need is clear, the state of the art on available methods to solve this peculiar problem is limited. Methods to calculate NaTech risk according to a performance-based approach have already been proposed, especially for hazardous plants like refineries and oil & gas plant. Differently, a few similar approaches have been used for estimating the risk of consequences generated by a hydrocarbon material release from a pipeline subjected to landslide. In this paper a performance-based methodology to assess the mean annual frequency of release from pipelines for the transportation of hydrocarbons subjected to a landslide is proposed. This methodology employs the hazard curves of landslides, and the fragility curves of the pipelines defined in terms of permanent ground deformation. The content release is evaluated by using mechanical response quantities as local deformation as suggested in the literature. The proposed approach is validated through a representative case study of a pipeline for the transportation of oil crossing in a mountain region.
基于性能的油气管道滑坡风险评估方法
分布的天然气和石油管道经常穿过容易发生滑坡的地区。根据欧盟指令2012/18/UE(也称为Seveso III),应该评估管道对人们和社区服务的风险。如果需求是明确的,那么解决这一特殊问题的现有方法的技术水平是有限的。已经提出了基于性能的方法来计算NaTech风险的方法,特别是对于炼油厂和石油天然气厂等危险工厂。不同的是,一些类似的方法已经被用来估计碳氢化合物物质从遭受滑坡的管道释放所产生的后果的风险。本文提出了一种基于性能的方法来评估遭受滑坡的碳氢化合物运输管道释放的平均年频率。该方法采用了滑坡的危险曲线,以及根据永久地面变形定义的管道的易损性曲线。内容释放是通过使用文献中建议的机械响应量作为局部变形来评估的。最后,以某山区输油管道为例,对该方法进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信