{"title":"A seismic resilience assessment framework for urban interchanges considering system functionality loss and recovery","authors":"Tianyi Li , Dongyu Zhang , Xiaoyu Zhang , Hui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interchanges are critical nodes in urban transport networks, and their seismic resilience is key to effective emergency response and recovery. However, current assessment methods focus on individual bridges, overlooking functional interdependencies within interchanges. Recovery models are often based on damage states and engineering judgment, which may not reflect actual restoration processes. To address these limitations, this study proposes a resilience assessment framework that accounts for both systemic functionality loss and recovery. Firstly, the interchange functionality is divided into safety and traffic functionality, systematically integrated through a hierarchical belief rule-based approach. The safety functionality is evaluated using system fragility, while the traffic functionality accounts for component functional dependencies and the impact of network traffic flow characteristics on performance. Secondly, the duration and functionality status at each stage of the restoration process are determined by integrating the repair time of each performance group with a segmented and hierarchical construction strategy. Subsequently, the Monte Carlo method is employed to compute the resilience index through multiple simulations. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to an example interchange, with results compared to those from traditional, expert-based methods. While traditional approaches show considerable variability, the proposed method produces intermediate results that balance these differences. This framework offers a reliable, system-level approach for assessing interchange seismic resilience and informs decisions on retrofitting, emergency response, and resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105806"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interchanges are critical nodes in urban transport networks, and their seismic resilience is key to effective emergency response and recovery. However, current assessment methods focus on individual bridges, overlooking functional interdependencies within interchanges. Recovery models are often based on damage states and engineering judgment, which may not reflect actual restoration processes. To address these limitations, this study proposes a resilience assessment framework that accounts for both systemic functionality loss and recovery. Firstly, the interchange functionality is divided into safety and traffic functionality, systematically integrated through a hierarchical belief rule-based approach. The safety functionality is evaluated using system fragility, while the traffic functionality accounts for component functional dependencies and the impact of network traffic flow characteristics on performance. Secondly, the duration and functionality status at each stage of the restoration process are determined by integrating the repair time of each performance group with a segmented and hierarchical construction strategy. Subsequently, the Monte Carlo method is employed to compute the resilience index through multiple simulations. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to an example interchange, with results compared to those from traditional, expert-based methods. While traditional approaches show considerable variability, the proposed method produces intermediate results that balance these differences. This framework offers a reliable, system-level approach for assessing interchange seismic resilience and informs decisions on retrofitting, emergency response, and resource allocation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.