A seismic resilience assessment framework for urban interchanges considering system functionality loss and recovery

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tianyi Li , Dongyu Zhang , Xiaoyu Zhang , Hui Li
{"title":"A seismic resilience assessment framework for urban interchanges considering system functionality loss and recovery","authors":"Tianyi Li ,&nbsp;Dongyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Hui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interchanges are critical nodes in urban transport networks, and their seismic resilience is key to effective emergency response and recovery. However, current assessment methods focus on individual bridges, overlooking functional interdependencies within interchanges. Recovery models are often based on damage states and engineering judgment, which may not reflect actual restoration processes. To address these limitations, this study proposes a resilience assessment framework that accounts for both systemic functionality loss and recovery. Firstly, the interchange functionality is divided into safety and traffic functionality, systematically integrated through a hierarchical belief rule-based approach. The safety functionality is evaluated using system fragility, while the traffic functionality accounts for component functional dependencies and the impact of network traffic flow characteristics on performance. Secondly, the duration and functionality status at each stage of the restoration process are determined by integrating the repair time of each performance group with a segmented and hierarchical construction strategy. Subsequently, the Monte Carlo method is employed to compute the resilience index through multiple simulations. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to an example interchange, with results compared to those from traditional, expert-based methods. While traditional approaches show considerable variability, the proposed method produces intermediate results that balance these differences. This framework offers a reliable, system-level approach for assessing interchange seismic resilience and informs decisions on retrofitting, emergency response, and resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105806"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interchanges are critical nodes in urban transport networks, and their seismic resilience is key to effective emergency response and recovery. However, current assessment methods focus on individual bridges, overlooking functional interdependencies within interchanges. Recovery models are often based on damage states and engineering judgment, which may not reflect actual restoration processes. To address these limitations, this study proposes a resilience assessment framework that accounts for both systemic functionality loss and recovery. Firstly, the interchange functionality is divided into safety and traffic functionality, systematically integrated through a hierarchical belief rule-based approach. The safety functionality is evaluated using system fragility, while the traffic functionality accounts for component functional dependencies and the impact of network traffic flow characteristics on performance. Secondly, the duration and functionality status at each stage of the restoration process are determined by integrating the repair time of each performance group with a segmented and hierarchical construction strategy. Subsequently, the Monte Carlo method is employed to compute the resilience index through multiple simulations. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to an example interchange, with results compared to those from traditional, expert-based methods. While traditional approaches show considerable variability, the proposed method produces intermediate results that balance these differences. This framework offers a reliable, system-level approach for assessing interchange seismic resilience and informs decisions on retrofitting, emergency response, and resource allocation.
考虑系统功能损失和恢复的城市立交桥地震弹性评估框架
互通立交是城市交通网络的关键节点,其抗震能力是实现有效应急响应和恢复的关键。然而,目前的评估方法侧重于单个桥梁,而忽略了互交内部的功能相互依赖性。修复模型通常基于损伤状态和工程判断,可能不能反映实际的修复过程。为了解决这些限制,本研究提出了一个考虑系统功能损失和恢复的弹性评估框架。首先,将立交功能分为安全功能和交通功能,并通过基于分层信念规则的方法进行系统整合。安全功能使用系统脆弱性进行评估,而流量功能则考虑组件功能依赖关系和网络流量特征对性能的影响。其次,采用分段分层的施工策略,综合各性能组的修复时间,确定修复过程中各阶段的持续时间和功能状态;随后,通过多次模拟,采用蒙特卡罗方法计算弹性指数。最后,将提出的框架应用于实例交换,并与传统的基于专家的方法的结果进行了比较。虽然传统方法显示出相当大的可变性,但所提出的方法产生的中间结果平衡了这些差异。该框架提供了一种可靠的系统级方法,用于评估互通立交的抗震弹性,并为改造、应急响应和资源分配决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信