Jesse Andrews , Jiyoung Lee , Jenny B. Mason , Yunwoo Nam , Zhenghong Tang
{"title":"Associations between owner proximity and parcel-level flood exposure: Evidence from Douglas County, Nebraska","authors":"Jesse Andrews , Jiyoung Lee , Jenny B. Mason , Yunwoo Nam , Zhenghong Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study we examine how owner–parcel proximity is associated with parcel-scale flood exposure in Douglas County, Nebraska. We measure exposure and estimate logistic and spatial regression models that distinguish single-family residential (SFR) from multi-family residential (MFR) parcels while adjusting for assessed value, parcel area, structure age, and building presence. For SFR parcels, exposure rises with distance: out-of-state SFR holdings have 3.66 % SFHA exposure versus 0.69 % for owner-occupied SFR parcels and 2019 inundation rates of 3.15 % versus 0.31 %. Treating proximity continuously among non-occupant SFR parcels yields a per-log-kilometer odds ratio of 1.32 for SFHA exposure (95 % CI: 1.31–1.34); collapsing distances ≤10 km to a local category change this to 1.25 (95 % CI: 1.23–1.28), an approximately 5 % attenuation that leaves inference unchanged. Results are robust across distance encodings, and administrative proximity bands show moderate ordinal alignment with kilometer bins. Distance is not a consistent correlate of regulatory exposure for MFR parcels, and no MFR parcels met the 2019 inundation criterion. Descriptively, unimproved non-occupant holdings record the highest event rates, indicating that development status and distance jointly concentrate exposure. Collectively, the findings should motivate proximity aware policy including renter-focused flood-risk disclosures, portfolio-level transparency in rental registries, and targeted buyouts or incentives for distant owners of unimproved SFR parcels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study we examine how owner–parcel proximity is associated with parcel-scale flood exposure in Douglas County, Nebraska. We measure exposure and estimate logistic and spatial regression models that distinguish single-family residential (SFR) from multi-family residential (MFR) parcels while adjusting for assessed value, parcel area, structure age, and building presence. For SFR parcels, exposure rises with distance: out-of-state SFR holdings have 3.66 % SFHA exposure versus 0.69 % for owner-occupied SFR parcels and 2019 inundation rates of 3.15 % versus 0.31 %. Treating proximity continuously among non-occupant SFR parcels yields a per-log-kilometer odds ratio of 1.32 for SFHA exposure (95 % CI: 1.31–1.34); collapsing distances ≤10 km to a local category change this to 1.25 (95 % CI: 1.23–1.28), an approximately 5 % attenuation that leaves inference unchanged. Results are robust across distance encodings, and administrative proximity bands show moderate ordinal alignment with kilometer bins. Distance is not a consistent correlate of regulatory exposure for MFR parcels, and no MFR parcels met the 2019 inundation criterion. Descriptively, unimproved non-occupant holdings record the highest event rates, indicating that development status and distance jointly concentrate exposure. Collectively, the findings should motivate proximity aware policy including renter-focused flood-risk disclosures, portfolio-level transparency in rental registries, and targeted buyouts or incentives for distant owners of unimproved SFR parcels.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.