Genomic inbreeding evaluation and its effects on phenotype and selection accuracy of resistance to Edwardsiella tarda in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

IF 3.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Ding Lyu , Qiang Fu , Mianyu Liu , Yulong Hu , Guanzheng Lyu , Weiji Wang
{"title":"Genomic inbreeding evaluation and its effects on phenotype and selection accuracy of resistance to Edwardsiella tarda in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)","authors":"Ding Lyu ,&nbsp;Qiang Fu ,&nbsp;Mianyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yulong Hu ,&nbsp;Guanzheng Lyu ,&nbsp;Weiji Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To accurately evaluate the effects of inbreeding on phenotypes and selection accuracy, this study conducted resequencing on a population of turbot (<em>Scophthalmus maximus</em>) involved in resistance testing against <em>Edwardsiella tarda</em> and calculated individual inbreeding coefficients (<em>F</em>) based on SNP homozygosity (<span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mi>HOM</mi></msub></math></span>), diagonal of the SNP-based genomic relationship matrix (<span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mi>GRM</mi></msub></math></span>), and runs of homozygosity (ROH) with varying length thresholds (10 kb, 100 kb, 500 kb, 1000 kb; denoted as <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>10</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>100</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>500</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>1000</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>). The impact of <em>F</em> derived from these methods on phenotypic traits was assessed, and the potential improvement in genomic selection accuracy by incorporating inbreeding depression (ID) effects into the genetic evaluation model was examined. The average values of <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mi>HOM</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mi>GRM</mi></msub></math></span> were near zero (−0.006 ± 0.107 and 0.004 ± 0.064, respectively), while <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>10</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> exhibited the highest mean value (0.103 ± 0.064). As the ROH fragment length increased, the ROH-based <em>F</em> gradually decreased, with <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>1000</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> averaging 0.005 ± 0.011. Regression analysis revealed negative regression coefficients across all methods, but only <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>100</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>500</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> showed significant effects on phenotypic traits (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01, respectively). <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>1000</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> exhibited a marginal association with the phenotype (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.10). The estimated ID effects on resistance to <em>E. tarda</em> were largest for <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>1000</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (10.871 %), followed by <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>500</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (6.033 %) and <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>100</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (2.443 %). The prediction accuracy of GBLUP was 0.539. The accuracies of GBLUP-<span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>100</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and GBLUP-<span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>1000</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> were nearly identical to that of GBLUP (0.538 and 0.539, respectively), while GBLUP-<span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow><mi>ROH</mi><mn>500</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> showed a slight increase (0.543), though non-significant. These results indicate that while genomic inbreeding (especially <span><math><msub><mi>F</mi><mi>ROH</mi></msub></math></span>) negatively impacts traits, the interference of inbreeding effects on selection accuracy resistance to <em>E. tarda</em> can be kept at minimal levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8375,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture","volume":"612 ","pages":"Article 743178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848625010646","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To accurately evaluate the effects of inbreeding on phenotypes and selection accuracy, this study conducted resequencing on a population of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) involved in resistance testing against Edwardsiella tarda and calculated individual inbreeding coefficients (F) based on SNP homozygosity (FHOM), diagonal of the SNP-based genomic relationship matrix (FGRM), and runs of homozygosity (ROH) with varying length thresholds (10 kb, 100 kb, 500 kb, 1000 kb; denoted as FROH10, FROH100, FROH500, FROH1000). The impact of F derived from these methods on phenotypic traits was assessed, and the potential improvement in genomic selection accuracy by incorporating inbreeding depression (ID) effects into the genetic evaluation model was examined. The average values of FHOM and FGRM were near zero (−0.006 ± 0.107 and 0.004 ± 0.064, respectively), while FROH10 exhibited the highest mean value (0.103 ± 0.064). As the ROH fragment length increased, the ROH-based F gradually decreased, with FROH1000 averaging 0.005 ± 0.011. Regression analysis revealed negative regression coefficients across all methods, but only FROH100 and FROH500 showed significant effects on phenotypic traits (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). FROH1000 exhibited a marginal association with the phenotype (p < 0.10). The estimated ID effects on resistance to E. tarda were largest for FROH1000 (10.871 %), followed by FROH500 (6.033 %) and FROH100 (2.443 %). The prediction accuracy of GBLUP was 0.539. The accuracies of GBLUP-FROH100 and GBLUP-FROH1000 were nearly identical to that of GBLUP (0.538 and 0.539, respectively), while GBLUP-FROH500 showed a slight increase (0.543), though non-significant. These results indicate that while genomic inbreeding (especially FROH) negatively impacts traits, the interference of inbreeding effects on selection accuracy resistance to E. tarda can be kept at minimal levels.
大菱鲆(schophthalmus maximus)基因组近交评价及其对迟缓爱德华氏菌抗性表型和选择准确性的影响
为了准确评估近交对表型和选择准确性的影响,本研究对参与迟发Edwardsiella抗性测试的大菱鲆(Scophthalmus maximus)群体进行了重测序,并基于SNP纯合性(FHOM)、基于SNP的基因组关系矩阵(FGRM)对角线和不同长度阈值(10 kb、100 kb、500 kb、1000 kb;表示为FROH10, FROH100, FROH500, FROH1000)。评估了这些方法获得的F对表型性状的影响,并研究了将近交抑制(ID)效应纳入遗传评估模型对基因组选择准确性的潜在提高。FHOM和FGRM的平均值接近于零(分别为- 0.006±0.107和0.004±0.064),而FROH10的平均值最高(0.103±0.064)。随着ROH片段长度的增加,基于ROH的F值逐渐降低,FROH1000平均值为0.005±0.011。回归分析显示各方法的回归系数均为负,但只有FROH100和FROH500对表型性状有显著影响(p <; 0.05和p <; 0.01)。FROH1000表现出与表型的边际关联(p < 0.10)。菌株菌株FROH1000对延迟大肠杆菌抗性的影响最大(10.871%),其次是FROH500(6.033%)和FROH100(2.443 %)。GBLUP的预测精度为0.539。GBLUP- froh100和GBLUP- froh1000的准确性与GBLUP几乎相同(分别为0.538和0.539),而GBLUP- froh500略有增加(0.543),但不显著。这些结果表明,虽然基因组近交(尤其是FROH)对性状有负面影响,但近交对选择精度的干扰可以保持在最低水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquaculture
Aquaculture 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
17.80%
发文量
1246
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Aquaculture is an international journal for the exploration, improvement and management of all freshwater and marine food resources. It publishes novel and innovative research of world-wide interest on farming of aquatic organisms, which includes finfish, mollusks, crustaceans and aquatic plants for human consumption. Research on ornamentals is not a focus of the Journal. Aquaculture only publishes papers with a clear relevance to improving aquaculture practices or a potential application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信