Comparison between Xpert ultra and standard M10 for detection of MTBC in clinical samples

IF 1.8 4区医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease Pub Date : 2025-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117102

Laura Rindi , Vincenzo Puglisi , Iacopo Franconi , Antonella Lupetti

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB with GeneXpert® MTB/RIF Ultra test in detecting tuberculosis on 57 samples. Sensitivity and specificity were 92 % and 100 % with a positive predictive value of 100 % with a substantial agreement (0.74) at Kappa agreement test.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Xpert ultra与标准M10检测临床标本中MTBC的比较

本研究比较了STANDARD M10 MDR-TB与GeneXpert®MTB/RIF Ultra检测在57份样本中检测结核病的效果。Kappa一致性试验的敏感性和特异性分别为92%和100%，阳性预测值为100%，基本一致（0.74）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 医学-传染病学

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

3.40%

发文量

149

审稿时长

56 days

期刊介绍： Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.