The auxiliary diagnostic performance of creation tuberculin skin test for mycobacterium tuberculosis compared with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: A diagnostic accuracy study
{"title":"The auxiliary diagnostic performance of creation tuberculin skin test for mycobacterium tuberculosis compared with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: A diagnostic accuracy study","authors":"Jin Yin, Min Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For bacteriologically negative suspected tuberculosis, immunological testing provides important diagnostic evidence. The traditional tuberculin skin test has poor specificity. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus, the latest generation of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays) and creation tuberculin skin test (C-TST) offer higher specificity and are less affected by non-tuberculous mycobacteria and BCG vaccine. However, the efficacy of QFT-Plus and C-TST in suspected tuberculosis remain unclear. We compared the performance of the QFT-Plus with the C-TST in auxiliary diagnosing tuberculosis in individuals with suspected tuberculosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The subjects were 137 patients suspected of tuberculosis, including 74 pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients and 63 non-active pulmonary tuberculosis. All participants underwent both QFT-Plus and C-TST testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sensitivities of QFT-Plus and C-TST in diagnosing PTB were 93.15 % and 86.49 %, respectively. The specificities of QFT-Plus and C-TST in diagnosing PTB were 40.35 % and 41.27 %, respectively. When QFT-Plus and C-TST were combined, the specificity increased to 58.73 %. The Area Under the Curves of Receiver Operating Characteristic in QFT-Plus and C-TST were 0.79 vs 0.67 (<em>p</em> < 0.05), respectively. In addition, the median IFN-γ level of TB2 tubes in the PTB group of QFT-Plus was significantly higher than that of TB1 tubes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>QFT-Plus and C-TST demonstrated diagnostic value in helping clinicians identify PTB and rule out non-patients to a certain extent, and the two methods had moderate agreement. The combined diagnosis statistically improved the specificity in auxiliary diagnosing PTB. Furthermore, the QFT-Plus appears more advantageous than C-TST for auxiliary diagnosing of tuberculosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"114 1","pages":"Article 117103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325004250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
For bacteriologically negative suspected tuberculosis, immunological testing provides important diagnostic evidence. The traditional tuberculin skin test has poor specificity. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus, the latest generation of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays) and creation tuberculin skin test (C-TST) offer higher specificity and are less affected by non-tuberculous mycobacteria and BCG vaccine. However, the efficacy of QFT-Plus and C-TST in suspected tuberculosis remain unclear. We compared the performance of the QFT-Plus with the C-TST in auxiliary diagnosing tuberculosis in individuals with suspected tuberculosis.
Methods
The subjects were 137 patients suspected of tuberculosis, including 74 pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients and 63 non-active pulmonary tuberculosis. All participants underwent both QFT-Plus and C-TST testing.
Results
The sensitivities of QFT-Plus and C-TST in diagnosing PTB were 93.15 % and 86.49 %, respectively. The specificities of QFT-Plus and C-TST in diagnosing PTB were 40.35 % and 41.27 %, respectively. When QFT-Plus and C-TST were combined, the specificity increased to 58.73 %. The Area Under the Curves of Receiver Operating Characteristic in QFT-Plus and C-TST were 0.79 vs 0.67 (p < 0.05), respectively. In addition, the median IFN-γ level of TB2 tubes in the PTB group of QFT-Plus was significantly higher than that of TB1 tubes.
Conclusions
QFT-Plus and C-TST demonstrated diagnostic value in helping clinicians identify PTB and rule out non-patients to a certain extent, and the two methods had moderate agreement. The combined diagnosis statistically improved the specificity in auxiliary diagnosing PTB. Furthermore, the QFT-Plus appears more advantageous than C-TST for auxiliary diagnosing of tuberculosis.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.