{"title":"Placebo Effect on Changes in Magnetic Resonance-based Endpoints in Patients With MASH: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Matheus Souza , Lubna Al-Sharif , Samira M. Khalil , Ivanna Diaz","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2025.103173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Magnetic resonance (MR)-based techniques are increasingly being used in early-phase trials of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) as a noninvasive alternative to liver histology for assessing drug efficacy. Understanding the placebo effect in MR-based endpoints is essential for interpreting results and designing future trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the placebo response and identify its modifiers in MR-based endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library through December 13, 2024 for phase ≥2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacologic agents with placebo in adults with MASH that provided MR-based assessments. Pooled placebo response rates were estimated using generalized linear mixed models with Clopper–Pearson intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 21 RCTs comprising 800 placebo-treated patients. A clinically meaningful relative reduction in liver fat (≥30% relative reduction in magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] proton density fat fraction [MRI-PDFF]) was observed in 19.21% (95% CI: 16.23 to 22.59; I<sup>2</sup> = 7.2%) of placebo patients. The pooled placebo response rates for liver fat normalization (≥5% absolute reduction in MRI-PDFF) and MRI-PDFF super-response (≥50% relative reduction in MRI-PDFF) were 17.19% (95% CI: 11.70 to 24.56; I<sup>2</sup> = 27.9%) and 6.14% (95% CI: 2.63 to 13.69; I<sup>2</sup> = 12.9%), respectively. Reductions in liver stiffness (≥15% relative reduction by magnetic resonance elastography) and fibro-inflammation (corrected T1 response by multiparametric MRI) occurred in 26.09% (95% CI: 18.14 to 35.98; I<sup>2</sup> = 15.1%) and 13.43% (95% CI: 7.14 to 23.85; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Placebo-treated patients with MASH show significant improvements across MR-based endpoints with low heterogeneity. These data support the potential reproducibility of MR-based endpoints in assessing treatment efficacy in MASH and should be considered in future trial design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"15 6","pages":"Article 103173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688325006735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims
Magnetic resonance (MR)-based techniques are increasingly being used in early-phase trials of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) as a noninvasive alternative to liver histology for assessing drug efficacy. Understanding the placebo effect in MR-based endpoints is essential for interpreting results and designing future trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the placebo response and identify its modifiers in MR-based endpoints.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library through December 13, 2024 for phase ≥2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacologic agents with placebo in adults with MASH that provided MR-based assessments. Pooled placebo response rates were estimated using generalized linear mixed models with Clopper–Pearson intervals.
Results
We included 21 RCTs comprising 800 placebo-treated patients. A clinically meaningful relative reduction in liver fat (≥30% relative reduction in magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] proton density fat fraction [MRI-PDFF]) was observed in 19.21% (95% CI: 16.23 to 22.59; I2 = 7.2%) of placebo patients. The pooled placebo response rates for liver fat normalization (≥5% absolute reduction in MRI-PDFF) and MRI-PDFF super-response (≥50% relative reduction in MRI-PDFF) were 17.19% (95% CI: 11.70 to 24.56; I2 = 27.9%) and 6.14% (95% CI: 2.63 to 13.69; I2 = 12.9%), respectively. Reductions in liver stiffness (≥15% relative reduction by magnetic resonance elastography) and fibro-inflammation (corrected T1 response by multiparametric MRI) occurred in 26.09% (95% CI: 18.14 to 35.98; I2 = 15.1%) and 13.43% (95% CI: 7.14 to 23.85; I2 = 0%), respectively.
Conclusions
Placebo-treated patients with MASH show significant improvements across MR-based endpoints with low heterogeneity. These data support the potential reproducibility of MR-based endpoints in assessing treatment efficacy in MASH and should be considered in future trial design.