{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients With Suspected Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Takumi Osawa, Naoki Nakayama, Tomoko Ishizu, Toru Kondo, Takahiro Nakashima, Takeshi Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Hanada, Katsutaka Hashiba, Jin Kirigaya, Yumiko Hosoya, Aya Katasako-Yabumoto, Yusuke Okazaki, Masahiro Yamamoto, Kazuo Sakamoto, Marina Arai, Akihito Tanaka, Kunihiro Matsuo, Junichi Yamaguchi, Toshiaki Mano, Sunao Kojima, Teruo Noguchi, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Migaku Kikuchi, Toshikazu Funazaki, Yoshio Tahara, Hiroshi Nonogi, Tetsuya Matoba","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in emergency departments, requires rapid diagnosis and management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used as a bedside tool; however, its impact on prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether POCUS improves the clinical outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023, for studies evaluating the prognostic impact of POCUS in adults with undifferentiated shock, including cardiogenic shock. From 3,759 identified records, 2 studies (1 randomized controlled trial [RCT] and 1 observational study) involving 5,711 patients with shock were included. The RCT showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups (relative risk [RR] 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.51]). The observational study reported higher mortality in patients receiving POCUS before intervention (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.12-1.39]). Overall, POCUS did not significantly reduce mortality in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Given the limited number and quality of available studies, the certainty of evidence was low (RCT) and very low (observational study).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although POCUS plays an essential role in diagnosis and clinical decision-making, our review suggests that it may not significantly improve prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Further studies are required to determine its prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 9","pages":"735-741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in emergency departments, requires rapid diagnosis and management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used as a bedside tool; however, its impact on prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether POCUS improves the clinical outcomes in these patients.
Methods and results: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023, for studies evaluating the prognostic impact of POCUS in adults with undifferentiated shock, including cardiogenic shock. From 3,759 identified records, 2 studies (1 randomized controlled trial [RCT] and 1 observational study) involving 5,711 patients with shock were included. The RCT showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups (relative risk [RR] 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.51]). The observational study reported higher mortality in patients receiving POCUS before intervention (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.12-1.39]). Overall, POCUS did not significantly reduce mortality in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Given the limited number and quality of available studies, the certainty of evidence was low (RCT) and very low (observational study).
Conclusions: Although POCUS plays an essential role in diagnosis and clinical decision-making, our review suggests that it may not significantly improve prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Further studies are required to determine its prognostic value.
背景:心源性休克是急诊科经常遇到的危及生命的疾病,需要快速诊断和处理。即时超声(POCUS)作为一种床边工具被广泛使用;然而,其对疑似心源性休克患者预后的影响尚不清楚。本系统综述旨在评估POCUS是否能改善这些患者的临床结果。方法和结果:截至2023年12月31日,我们检索PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,以评估POCUS对未分化性休克(包括心源性休克)成人预后影响的研究。从3759份已确认的记录中,纳入了2项研究(1项随机对照试验[RCT]和1项观察性研究),涉及5711例休克患者。随机对照试验显示,POCUS组和非POCUS组住院死亡率无显著差异(相对危险度[RR] 0.99[95%可信区间(CI) 0.64-1.51])。观察性研究报告,干预前接受POCUS的患者死亡率较高(RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.12-1.39])。总体而言,POCUS并没有显著降低疑似心源性休克患者的死亡率。鉴于现有研究的数量和质量有限,证据的确定性较低(随机对照试验),非常低(观察性研究)。结论:虽然POCUS在诊断和临床决策中发挥了重要作用,但我们的综述表明,它可能不会显著改善疑似心源性休克患者的预后。需要进一步的研究来确定其预后价值。