Efficacy and safety of Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an overview of systematic reviews and meta analyses.

IF 2.2
Zhuang Wang, Na Wang, Xue Liang, Lina Wei, Yongfu Song, Dongze Li, Yongji Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an overview of systematic reviews and meta analyses.","authors":"Zhuang Wang, Na Wang, Xue Liang, Lina Wei, Yongfu Song, Dongze Li, Yongji Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09664-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reappraisal of Systematic reviews/Meta analyses on Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Evidence for Clinical Practice and Decision-Making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG, and CBM databases from their inception to June 8, 2025, to systematically identify Systematic reviews and Meta analyses on Sublingual Immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. A citation overlap matrix was constructed to calculate the corrected covered area, assessing the degree of primary study overlap. The risk of bias, methodological quality, reporting quality, and certainty of evidence in the included Systematic reviews/Meta analyses were evaluated using ROBIS, AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE tools, respectively. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the primary outcomes to derive a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 Systematic reviews/Meta analyses were included in this umbrella review. The corrected covered area of 6.391% derived from the citation matrix analysis indicated a modest degree of primary study overlap among the included literature. Risk of bias assessment demonstrated that all incorporated studies exhibited low bias risk. Methodological quality evaluation revealed 2 high-quality, 3 moderate-quality, 14 low-quality, and 1 extremely low-quality study. Reporting quality assessment yielded scores ranging from 22 to 41.5, with 7 studies classified as high-quality, 11 as moderate-quality, and 2 as low-quality reports. The evidence quality assessment revealed that among all evaluated outcomes, 7 were rated as high quality, 19 as moderate quality, 31 as low quality, and 14 as extremely low quality according to the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Current evidence demonstrates that Sublingual Immunotherapy exhibits favorable efficacy in improving symptom scores and medication use for allergic rhinitis, with generally acceptable safety profiles despite mild adverse reactions in some cases. Future research should focus on large-scale, real-world studies with diverse outcome measures, investigating variations in regional populations, allergen types, dosage regimens, and treatment durations to further optimize clinical application protocols for Sublingual Immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09664-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reappraisal of Systematic reviews/Meta analyses on Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Evidence for Clinical Practice and Decision-Making.

Methods: A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG, and CBM databases from their inception to June 8, 2025, to systematically identify Systematic reviews and Meta analyses on Sublingual Immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. A citation overlap matrix was constructed to calculate the corrected covered area, assessing the degree of primary study overlap. The risk of bias, methodological quality, reporting quality, and certainty of evidence in the included Systematic reviews/Meta analyses were evaluated using ROBIS, AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE tools, respectively. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the primary outcomes to derive a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding.

Results: A total of 20 Systematic reviews/Meta analyses were included in this umbrella review. The corrected covered area of 6.391% derived from the citation matrix analysis indicated a modest degree of primary study overlap among the included literature. Risk of bias assessment demonstrated that all incorporated studies exhibited low bias risk. Methodological quality evaluation revealed 2 high-quality, 3 moderate-quality, 14 low-quality, and 1 extremely low-quality study. Reporting quality assessment yielded scores ranging from 22 to 41.5, with 7 studies classified as high-quality, 11 as moderate-quality, and 2 as low-quality reports. The evidence quality assessment revealed that among all evaluated outcomes, 7 were rated as high quality, 19 as moderate quality, 31 as low quality, and 14 as extremely low quality according to the GRADE framework.

Discussion: Current evidence demonstrates that Sublingual Immunotherapy exhibits favorable efficacy in improving symptom scores and medication use for allergic rhinitis, with generally acceptable safety profiles despite mild adverse reactions in some cases. Future research should focus on large-scale, real-world studies with diverse outcome measures, investigating variations in regional populations, allergen types, dosage regimens, and treatment durations to further optimize clinical application protocols for Sublingual Immunotherapy.

舌下免疫治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介:变应性鼻炎舌下免疫治疗的系统评价/Meta分析:临床实践和决策的证据。方法:综合计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP、万方、CBM数据库,从数据库建立至2025年6月8日,系统地识别关于舌下免疫治疗变应性鼻炎的系统评价和Meta分析。构建引文重叠矩阵计算修正覆盖面积,评估主要研究的重叠程度。分别使用ROBIS、AMSTAR-2、PRISMA 2020和GRADE工具对纳入的系统评价/Meta分析的偏倚风险、方法学质量、报告质量和证据确定性进行评估。对主要结果进行定量和定性分析,以获得更全面和深入的理解。结果:本综述共纳入了20项系统综述/Meta分析。修正后的引用面积为6.391%,表明纳入文献中存在一定程度的主要研究重叠。偏倚风险评估表明,所有纳入的研究均表现出低偏倚风险。方法学质量评价显示2项高质量研究,3项中等质量研究,14项低质量研究,1项极低质量研究。报告质量评估的评分范围从22到41.5,其中7项研究被分类为高质量,11项为中等质量,2项为低质量报告。证据质量评估显示,根据GRADE框架,在所有评估结果中,7个为高质量,19个为中等质量,31个为低质量,14个为极低质量。讨论:目前的证据表明,舌下免疫疗法在改善变应性鼻炎的症状评分和药物使用方面表现出良好的疗效,尽管在某些情况下有轻微的不良反应,但总体上可以接受的安全性。未来的研究应侧重于大规模的、具有不同结果测量的真实世界研究,调查地区人群、过敏原类型、剂量方案和治疗持续时间的变化,以进一步优化舌下免疫治疗的临床应用方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信