White Blood Cell Enumeration and Differential by Flow Cytometry: The ICSH WBC Reference Method.

Benjamin D Hedley, Michael Keeney, Peter Gambell, Chenxue Qu, Jenny Mao, Bruce H Davis, Brent L Wood
{"title":"White Blood Cell Enumeration and Differential by Flow Cytometry: The ICSH WBC Reference Method.","authors":"Benjamin D Hedley, Michael Keeney, Peter Gambell, Chenxue Qu, Jenny Mao, Bruce H Davis, Brent L Wood","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The current reference method for the white blood cell (WBC) differential is manual smear review as outlined in CLSI H20-A2. As with many manual methods, it suffers from a number of challenges including dependence upon the expertise of the interpreter, the quality of the smear and stain, when dysplastic features make cell identification difficult, imprecision with leucopenia, and enumeration bias due to non-uniform cell distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study describes an alternative method for establishing the leucocyte differential using a single-tube, 8-color flow cytometric reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data presented is from an international comparison of normal (based on analyzer counts, N = 120) and abnormal (N = 496) clinical samples performed at four institutions using four different models of flow cytometers. Here we demonstrate equivalent performance between the flow cytometric method and the current manual reference method, but show improved performance of the proposed reference method for low/infrequent cell populations, for example, monocytes and basophils.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The flow cytometric method also performs well in comparison with hematology analyzers in current clinical use, including good correlation for total white blood cell enumeration. The findings indicate that the flow cytometric method, deemed the \"ICSH WBC reference,\" could be used in lieu of CLSI H20-A2 as a reference for white blood cell enumeration and differential counting and specifically for the evaluation of automated differential counters.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The current reference method for the white blood cell (WBC) differential is manual smear review as outlined in CLSI H20-A2. As with many manual methods, it suffers from a number of challenges including dependence upon the expertise of the interpreter, the quality of the smear and stain, when dysplastic features make cell identification difficult, imprecision with leucopenia, and enumeration bias due to non-uniform cell distribution.

Methods: This study describes an alternative method for establishing the leucocyte differential using a single-tube, 8-color flow cytometric reference method.

Results: Data presented is from an international comparison of normal (based on analyzer counts, N = 120) and abnormal (N = 496) clinical samples performed at four institutions using four different models of flow cytometers. Here we demonstrate equivalent performance between the flow cytometric method and the current manual reference method, but show improved performance of the proposed reference method for low/infrequent cell populations, for example, monocytes and basophils.

Conclusion: The flow cytometric method also performs well in comparison with hematology analyzers in current clinical use, including good correlation for total white blood cell enumeration. The findings indicate that the flow cytometric method, deemed the "ICSH WBC reference," could be used in lieu of CLSI H20-A2 as a reference for white blood cell enumeration and differential counting and specifically for the evaluation of automated differential counters.

流式细胞术白细胞计数与鉴别:ICSH白细胞计数参考方法。
介绍:目前白细胞(WBC)鉴别的参考方法是手工涂片检查,如CLSI H20-A2所述。与许多手工方法一样,它面临着许多挑战,包括依赖于口译员的专业知识,涂片和染色的质量,当发育不良的特征使细胞鉴定困难时,白细胞减少的不精确,以及由于细胞分布不均匀而导致的计数偏差。方法:本研究采用单管8色流式细胞术参比法建立白细胞鉴别。结果:所提供的数据来自四个机构使用四种不同型号的流式细胞仪进行的正常(基于分析仪计数,N = 120)和异常(N = 496)临床样本的国际比较。在这里,我们证明了流式细胞术方法和当前手工参考方法之间的等效性能,但表明了所提出的参考方法在低/罕见细胞群(例如单核细胞和嗜碱性细胞)中的性能有所提高。结论:流式细胞术方法与目前临床使用的血液学分析仪相比也有良好的表现,包括白细胞计数总量有良好的相关性。研究结果表明,被视为“ICSH白细胞计数参考”的流式细胞术方法可以代替CLSI H20-A2作为白细胞计数和鉴别计数的参考,特别是用于评估自动鉴别计数器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信