Franziska C S Altorfer, Jenny J Yan, Frederik Abel, Ellen Casey, Darryl B Sneag, Ek T Tan, Darren R Lebl, J Levi Chazen
{"title":"Lumbar Spine Bone MRI: A Radiation-Free Approach Utilizing CT-Like Imaging for Diagnosing Pars Defects in the Adolescent Spine.","authors":"Franziska C S Altorfer, Jenny J Yan, Frederik Abel, Ellen Casey, Darryl B Sneag, Ek T Tan, Darren R Lebl, J Levi Chazen","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study to assess the quality of a synthetic bone MRI protocol by using the spoiled GRE (SPGRE) sequence and determine its usability in detecting pars defects in adolescent patients for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 30 adolescent patients with lumbar spondylolysis and low back pain. Patients underwent a clinical lumbar spine MRI at 3T that included a 3D SPGRE sequence; 5 patients also underwent a CT for comparison. An orthopedic spine surgeon and an attending radiologist analyzed inverted SGPR and CT images, assessing the presence of a lumbar pars defect and image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The interreader agreement was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were identified with pars defects seen in all patients on the SPGRE MRI. Image quality scores on a 5-point Likert scale measured an overall average of 4.53 ± 0.60, corresponding to good to perfect image quality, with a substantial interrater agreement with a Gwet AC2 of 0.79 [0.71, 0.88], without significant difference between the orthopedic surgeon and the radiologist (orthopedic surgeon's score 4.50 ± 0.63, radiologist's score 4.53 ± 0.57; <i>P</i> = .91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A synthetic bone MRI protocol using SPGRE is a viable, nonionizing alternative to CT for visualizing pars defects in adolescent patients, providing sufficient image quality for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: This is a retrospective cohort study to assess the quality of a synthetic bone MRI protocol by using the spoiled GRE (SPGRE) sequence and determine its usability in detecting pars defects in adolescent patients for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 30 adolescent patients with lumbar spondylolysis and low back pain. Patients underwent a clinical lumbar spine MRI at 3T that included a 3D SPGRE sequence; 5 patients also underwent a CT for comparison. An orthopedic spine surgeon and an attending radiologist analyzed inverted SGPR and CT images, assessing the presence of a lumbar pars defect and image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The interreader agreement was calculated.
Results: Thirty patients were identified with pars defects seen in all patients on the SPGRE MRI. Image quality scores on a 5-point Likert scale measured an overall average of 4.53 ± 0.60, corresponding to good to perfect image quality, with a substantial interrater agreement with a Gwet AC2 of 0.79 [0.71, 0.88], without significant difference between the orthopedic surgeon and the radiologist (orthopedic surgeon's score 4.50 ± 0.63, radiologist's score 4.53 ± 0.57; P = .91).
Conclusions: A synthetic bone MRI protocol using SPGRE is a viable, nonionizing alternative to CT for visualizing pars defects in adolescent patients, providing sufficient image quality for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.