Recovery pulse rate and cardiovascular function indices in young female adults following orthostasis.

Journal of biological methods Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14440/jbm.2024.0127
Mayowa Jeremiah Adeniyi, Ayoola Awosika
{"title":"Recovery pulse rate and cardiovascular function indices in young female adults following orthostasis.","authors":"Mayowa Jeremiah Adeniyi, Ayoola Awosika","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2024.0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recovery pulse rate (RPR) and other cardiovascular indices - such as heart rate variability and blood pressure recovery - are underutilized tools in assessing autonomic and cardiovascular adaptability to orthostasis. While orthostatic hypotension is well-documented, the prognostic significance of delayed heart rate recovery and impaired autonomic compensation remains insufficiently explored. Emerging evidence suggests that abnormal RPR may predict cardiovascular morbidity and autonomic dysfunction; however, standardized clinical guidelines for its interpretation are lacking. Bridging this gap could enhance early detection of dysautonomia and cardiovascular risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the pattern of RPR and cardiovascular function indices in healthy young female adults following 10 min of upright standing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated post-orthostatic cardiovascular indices, including RPR measured at two intervals: 10 - 20 s and 21 - 31 s after returning to a reclining sitting position. A total of 35 healthy females were selected for the study, and appropriate inclusion was duly considered. Blood pressure, pulse rate, and other parameters were measured at baseline, after 10 min of standing, and after returning to a reclining sitting position using standard procedures. The first and second RPRs were calculated as the difference between the orthostatic pulse rate and the pulse rate measured during the two intervals, respectively, after returning to a reclining sitting position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the first and second RPRs. Among the cardiovascular parameters, only systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure measured after the second RPR were significantly higher than baseline values. In addition, neither the first nor the second RPR correlated with body weight, height, or body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant difference was found in autonomic response during the 10 - 20 s and 21 - 31 s post-orthostatic periods in young adult females. Incorporating RPR and related indices into clinical practice provides a non-invasive, cost-effective method to identify and monitor autonomic and cardiovascular dysfunction. This can guide therapeutic strategies, such as fluid management, exercise rehabilitation, or pharmacological interventions, tailored to improve autonomic balance and cardiovascular resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":"12 3","pages":"e99010068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recovery pulse rate (RPR) and other cardiovascular indices - such as heart rate variability and blood pressure recovery - are underutilized tools in assessing autonomic and cardiovascular adaptability to orthostasis. While orthostatic hypotension is well-documented, the prognostic significance of delayed heart rate recovery and impaired autonomic compensation remains insufficiently explored. Emerging evidence suggests that abnormal RPR may predict cardiovascular morbidity and autonomic dysfunction; however, standardized clinical guidelines for its interpretation are lacking. Bridging this gap could enhance early detection of dysautonomia and cardiovascular risk stratification.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the pattern of RPR and cardiovascular function indices in healthy young female adults following 10 min of upright standing.

Methods: This study evaluated post-orthostatic cardiovascular indices, including RPR measured at two intervals: 10 - 20 s and 21 - 31 s after returning to a reclining sitting position. A total of 35 healthy females were selected for the study, and appropriate inclusion was duly considered. Blood pressure, pulse rate, and other parameters were measured at baseline, after 10 min of standing, and after returning to a reclining sitting position using standard procedures. The first and second RPRs were calculated as the difference between the orthostatic pulse rate and the pulse rate measured during the two intervals, respectively, after returning to a reclining sitting position.

Results: There was no significant difference between the first and second RPRs. Among the cardiovascular parameters, only systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure measured after the second RPR were significantly higher than baseline values. In addition, neither the first nor the second RPR correlated with body weight, height, or body mass index.

Conclusion: No significant difference was found in autonomic response during the 10 - 20 s and 21 - 31 s post-orthostatic periods in young adult females. Incorporating RPR and related indices into clinical practice provides a non-invasive, cost-effective method to identify and monitor autonomic and cardiovascular dysfunction. This can guide therapeutic strategies, such as fluid management, exercise rehabilitation, or pharmacological interventions, tailored to improve autonomic balance and cardiovascular resilience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

年轻女性成人直立后恢复脉搏率及心血管功能指标。
背景:恢复脉搏率(RPR)和其他心血管指标-如心率变异性和血压恢复-是评估自主和心血管对直立性适应性的未充分利用的工具。虽然体位性低血压有充分的文献记载,但心率恢复延迟和自主神经代偿受损的预后意义仍未得到充分探讨。新出现的证据表明,异常的RPR可能预测心血管疾病和自主神经功能障碍;然而,缺乏标准化的临床解释指南。弥补这一差距可以提高自主神经异常的早期发现和心血管风险分层。目的:研究健康年轻成年女性站立10 min后RPR及心血管功能指标的变化规律。方法:本研究评估了站立后的心血管指标,包括RPR,分别在恢复平躺坐姿后的10 - 20秒和21 - 31秒测量。共选择35名健康女性进行研究,并适当考虑纳入。血压、脉搏率和其他参数在基线时、站立10分钟后,以及使用标准程序恢复斜倚坐姿后进行测量。第一次和第二次rpr计算为直立脉搏率与两次间隔期间分别测量的脉搏率之间的差值,在回到斜倚坐姿后。结果:第一次与第二次RPRs比较无显著性差异。在心血管参数中,只有第二次RPR后测量的收缩压和脉压明显高于基线值。此外,第一次和第二次RPR均与体重、身高或体重指数无关。结论:青壮年女性直立后10 ~ 20 s和21 ~ 31 s的自主神经反应无显著性差异。将RPR及相关指标纳入临床实践,为自主神经和心血管功能障碍的识别和监测提供了一种无创、低成本的方法。这可以指导治疗策略,如液体管理、运动康复或药物干预,以改善自主神经平衡和心血管恢复力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信