Community Engagement Strategy for Building Trust in Human Challenge Studies Using Participatory and Creative Methods: An Ethical Imperative.

IF 2.1 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70028
Evelyn Muleba Kunda-Ng'andu, Masuzyo Chirwa, Seke Muzazu, Natasha Laban, Caroline Chisenga, Michelo Simuyandi, Stanley Mwale, Roma Chilengi, Anjali Sharma
{"title":"Community Engagement Strategy for Building Trust in Human Challenge Studies Using Participatory and Creative Methods: An Ethical Imperative.","authors":"Evelyn Muleba Kunda-Ng'andu, Masuzyo Chirwa, Seke Muzazu, Natasha Laban, Caroline Chisenga, Michelo Simuyandi, Stanley Mwale, Roma Chilengi, Anjali Sharma","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human Infection Challenge studies (HICs) are crucial for advancing global understanding of disease pathogenesis, immune responses, and accelerating vaccine and drug development. Explorations on willingness to participate among medical students revealed the need to ensure full understanding of HIC requirements, for example, for residency, by the broader community. This raised the question of 'How could we ensure informed and understood consent for the ethical conduct of HIC?' We employed iterative participatory discovery and creative design methods, including three Zoom meetings and discussions with university students and community leaders. Neighbourhood Health Committee leaders further refined suggested creatives of a future mass-media campaign for building trust in HICs. Deliberative focus group discussions and workshops were conducted on communication strategies on HICs' requirements, risks, requirements, and benefits. The final creative brief suggested (1) using a pyramid approach utilizing existing community structures, to introduce HIC concepts progressively to larger groups, (2) engaging communities through theatre for development, community dialogue, and engagement meetings, and wide society through social and mass media advertisements, and (3) preference for the term 'Human Challenge Studies' over 'Human Infection Challenge Studies'. We learned that community engagement, if properly conducted, can create systems of ownership of research and build communication strategies to achieve an accurate understanding of HICs and use informed participation that results in trustworthy data. We need further research, including in rural areas, pilot testing of evaluation strategies, and continued engagement with diverse stakeholders to create products that can be adapted by future HIC studies in settings such as Zambia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human Infection Challenge studies (HICs) are crucial for advancing global understanding of disease pathogenesis, immune responses, and accelerating vaccine and drug development. Explorations on willingness to participate among medical students revealed the need to ensure full understanding of HIC requirements, for example, for residency, by the broader community. This raised the question of 'How could we ensure informed and understood consent for the ethical conduct of HIC?' We employed iterative participatory discovery and creative design methods, including three Zoom meetings and discussions with university students and community leaders. Neighbourhood Health Committee leaders further refined suggested creatives of a future mass-media campaign for building trust in HICs. Deliberative focus group discussions and workshops were conducted on communication strategies on HICs' requirements, risks, requirements, and benefits. The final creative brief suggested (1) using a pyramid approach utilizing existing community structures, to introduce HIC concepts progressively to larger groups, (2) engaging communities through theatre for development, community dialogue, and engagement meetings, and wide society through social and mass media advertisements, and (3) preference for the term 'Human Challenge Studies' over 'Human Infection Challenge Studies'. We learned that community engagement, if properly conducted, can create systems of ownership of research and build communication strategies to achieve an accurate understanding of HICs and use informed participation that results in trustworthy data. We need further research, including in rural areas, pilot testing of evaluation strategies, and continued engagement with diverse stakeholders to create products that can be adapted by future HIC studies in settings such as Zambia.

使用参与性和创造性方法在人类挑战研究中建立信任的社区参与策略:一种道德要求。
人类感染挑战研究(HICs)对于促进全球对疾病发病机制、免疫反应的了解以及加速疫苗和药物开发至关重要。对医学生参与意愿的探索表明,需要确保更广泛的社区充分了解健康保险的要求,例如住院医师的要求。这就提出了一个问题:“我们如何确保对HIC道德行为的知情和理解同意?”我们采用了迭代式的参与式发现和创造性的设计方法,包括三次Zoom会议和与大学生和社区领袖的讨论。社区卫生委员会领导人进一步完善了未来大众媒体运动的创意,以建立对高收入社区的信任。就HICs的要求、风险、要求和利益的沟通策略进行了审议性焦点小组讨论和讲习班。最后的创意简报建议(1)使用金字塔方法利用现有的社区结构,逐步向更大的群体介绍HIC概念,(2)通过发展剧院、社区对话和参与会议吸引社区参与,并通过社会和大众媒体广告广泛的社会参与,以及(3)首选术语“人类挑战研究”而不是“人类感染挑战研究”。我们了解到,如果进行得当,社区参与可以创建研究所有权制度,并制定沟通策略,以实现对高收入国家的准确理解,并利用知情参与产生可靠的数据。我们需要进一步的研究,包括在农村地区进行研究,对评估战略进行试点测试,并继续与不同利益攸关方接触,以创造可在赞比亚等环境中进行未来HIC研究的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信