Horizon Scanning Methods for Health Care Technology Innovation Identification: Rapid Scoping Review of Patent Research Studies.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sonia Garcia Gonzalez-Moral, Erin Pennock, Olushola Ewedairo, Elizabeth Green, James Elgey, Andrew Mkwashi
{"title":"Horizon Scanning Methods for Health Care Technology Innovation Identification: Rapid Scoping Review of Patent Research Studies.","authors":"Sonia Garcia Gonzalez-Moral, Erin Pennock, Olushola Ewedairo, Elizabeth Green, James Elgey, Andrew Mkwashi","doi":"10.2196/70323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patents are an early sign of innovation, yet their role in horizon scanning for health care remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the role of, and methods for, patent analysis in advancing health care technology innovation in a sector that is characterized by diverse health care technologies and significant research investment. Patents are critical early indicators of innovation, supporting horizon scanning and weak signal detection. The study aimed to identify intellectual property sources, evaluate methods for patent retrieval and analysis, and outline objectives for using patent data to anticipate trends and inform health care strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid scoping review was conducted following Cochrane Rapid Review Methods recommendations and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a preregistered protocol on the Open Science Framework. Searches in Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science targeted records published 2020 onward to capture the most recent sources, methods, and tools. Three independent reviewers screened studies using Rayyan (Qatar Computing Research Institute). We included any study type published since 2020 that provided patent sources data, methods, and tools applied to the study of health care technologies. Our data extraction included bibliographic details, study characteristics, and methodological information. Risk of bias assessments were not undertaken. Narrative and tabular methods, supplemented by visual charts, were used to synthesize findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our searches identified 1741 studies, of which 124 were included after title, abstract, and full-text screening, with 54% being original research, 43.5% reviews, and the remainder being conference abstracts (2.5%). Most studies (68%) relied solely on patent databases, while others searched the gray and published literature. Research objectives of the included studies were grouped into 10 themes, with trend analysis (50%) and the provision of recommendations for future research, policy, and strategy development (20%) being the most common. Our review identified up to 47 patent databases, with 27% of studies using multiple sources. Whenever time limits were reported, the mean time horizon for patent searches was 24.6 years, ranging from 1900 to 2019. Automated approaches, used in 33% (n=43) of studies, frequently used tools such as Gephi (Gephi Consortium) for network visualization. Disease mapping based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence classification indicated that cancer (19%) and respiratory conditions (16%), particularly COVID-19, were key areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patent data are valuable for identifying technological trends and informing policy and research strategies. While patents provide crucial insights into emerging technologies, inconsistent deduplication practices across studies pose the risk of data inflation, accentuating the need for transparency and rigor. Finally, this review emphasized the importance of data transformation and visualization in detecting emerging trends, with Python and R being the most commonly used programming languages for developing custom tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e70323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patents are an early sign of innovation, yet their role in horizon scanning for health care remains unclear.

Objective: This study investigates the role of, and methods for, patent analysis in advancing health care technology innovation in a sector that is characterized by diverse health care technologies and significant research investment. Patents are critical early indicators of innovation, supporting horizon scanning and weak signal detection. The study aimed to identify intellectual property sources, evaluate methods for patent retrieval and analysis, and outline objectives for using patent data to anticipate trends and inform health care strategies.

Methods: A rapid scoping review was conducted following Cochrane Rapid Review Methods recommendations and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a preregistered protocol on the Open Science Framework. Searches in Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science targeted records published 2020 onward to capture the most recent sources, methods, and tools. Three independent reviewers screened studies using Rayyan (Qatar Computing Research Institute). We included any study type published since 2020 that provided patent sources data, methods, and tools applied to the study of health care technologies. Our data extraction included bibliographic details, study characteristics, and methodological information. Risk of bias assessments were not undertaken. Narrative and tabular methods, supplemented by visual charts, were used to synthesize findings.

Results: Our searches identified 1741 studies, of which 124 were included after title, abstract, and full-text screening, with 54% being original research, 43.5% reviews, and the remainder being conference abstracts (2.5%). Most studies (68%) relied solely on patent databases, while others searched the gray and published literature. Research objectives of the included studies were grouped into 10 themes, with trend analysis (50%) and the provision of recommendations for future research, policy, and strategy development (20%) being the most common. Our review identified up to 47 patent databases, with 27% of studies using multiple sources. Whenever time limits were reported, the mean time horizon for patent searches was 24.6 years, ranging from 1900 to 2019. Automated approaches, used in 33% (n=43) of studies, frequently used tools such as Gephi (Gephi Consortium) for network visualization. Disease mapping based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence classification indicated that cancer (19%) and respiratory conditions (16%), particularly COVID-19, were key areas.

Conclusions: Patent data are valuable for identifying technological trends and informing policy and research strategies. While patents provide crucial insights into emerging technologies, inconsistent deduplication practices across studies pose the risk of data inflation, accentuating the need for transparency and rigor. Finally, this review emphasized the importance of data transformation and visualization in detecting emerging trends, with Python and R being the most commonly used programming languages for developing custom tools.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

卫生保健技术创新识别的水平扫描方法:专利研究的快速范围审查。
背景:专利是创新的早期标志,但其在医疗保健水平扫描中的作用尚不清楚。目的:本研究探讨专利分析在促进医疗保健技术创新中的作用和方法,特别是在医疗保健技术多样化和研究投入显著的行业。专利是创新的关键早期指标,支持水平扫描和微弱信号检测。该研究旨在确定知识产权来源,评估专利检索和分析方法,并概述利用专利数据预测趋势和为卫生保健战略提供信息的目标。方法:按照Cochrane快速评价方法建议和PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行快速范围评价,并在开放科学框架上进行预注册。在Embase、IEEE explore和Web of Science中搜索针对2020年以后发布的记录,以获取最新的来源、方法和工具。三位独立的审稿人筛选了使用Rayyan(卡塔尔计算研究所)的研究。我们纳入了自2020年以来发表的任何研究类型,这些研究类型提供了应用于医疗保健技术研究的专利来源数据、方法和工具。我们的数据提取包括书目细节、研究特征和方法学信息。未进行偏倚风险评估。采用叙述和表格法,辅以视觉图表,综合研究结果。结果:我们检索了1741项研究,其中124项在标题、摘要和全文筛选后被纳入,其中54%为原创研究,43.5%为综述,其余为会议摘要(2.5%)。大多数研究(68%)仅依赖于专利数据库,而其他研究则搜索灰色和已发表的文献。纳入研究的研究目标分为10个主题,其中趋势分析(50%)和为未来研究、政策和战略发展提供建议(20%)是最常见的。我们的综述确定了多达47个专利数据库,其中27%的研究使用多个来源。每当报告时间限制时,专利检索的平均时间范围为24.6年,从1900年到2019年。33% (n=43)的研究使用了自动化方法,经常使用Gephi (Gephi Consortium)等工具进行网络可视化。基于国家健康和护理卓越研究所分类的疾病地图显示,癌症(19%)和呼吸系统疾病(16%),特别是COVID-19,是关键领域。结论:专利数据对于识别技术趋势和为政策和研究战略提供信息具有重要价值。虽然专利提供了对新兴技术的重要见解,但不同研究之间不一致的重复数据删除做法带来了数据膨胀的风险,凸显了对透明度和严谨性的需求。最后,这篇综述强调了数据转换和可视化在检测新兴趋势中的重要性,Python和R是开发定制工具最常用的编程语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信