J Soka, S Mwimanzi, C D Fast, G Mwesiga, N Edward, M Stephen, R Kondo, C Cox, N Beyene, T B Agizew
{"title":"Use of trained African giant pouched rats as a predictor of clinical diagnosis of pulmonary TB.","authors":"J Soka, S Mwimanzi, C D Fast, G Mwesiga, N Edward, M Stephen, R Kondo, C Cox, N Beyene, T B Agizew","doi":"10.5588/pha.25.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For over a decade, trained African giant pouched rats have been employed in detecting missed pulmonary TB (PTB). However, the relationship between rat-positive results and subsequent clinical PTB or extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) has not been previously reported. This report highlights the use of rat-positivity as a predictor for PTB clinical diagnosis and treatment among presumptive TB. Treating physicians were 1.39 times more likely to clinically diagnose and treat rat-positives than rat-negatives: 12% versus 9%, respectively, odds ratio=1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.84<i>.</i> No difference was observed among EPTB.</p>","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":"15 3","pages":"137-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.25.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For over a decade, trained African giant pouched rats have been employed in detecting missed pulmonary TB (PTB). However, the relationship between rat-positive results and subsequent clinical PTB or extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) has not been previously reported. This report highlights the use of rat-positivity as a predictor for PTB clinical diagnosis and treatment among presumptive TB. Treating physicians were 1.39 times more likely to clinically diagnose and treat rat-positives than rat-negatives: 12% versus 9%, respectively, odds ratio=1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.84. No difference was observed among EPTB.
期刊介绍:
Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.