Academic productivity and industry trends of fellowship-trained U.S. academic rhinologists.

IF 1.4 Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.226
Michael J Warn, Daniella Chan, Theodore V Nguyen, Sina J Torabi, Benjamin F Bitner, Edward C Kuan
{"title":"Academic productivity and industry trends of fellowship-trained U.S. academic rhinologists.","authors":"Michael J Warn, Daniella Chan, Theodore V Nguyen, Sina J Torabi, Benjamin F Bitner, Edward C Kuan","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic productivity is believed to be correlated with years of experience and departmental rank, yet there is a paucity of granular academic data between rhinology faculty regarding departmental rank and industry engagement, and how these relate to experience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the interrelationships between experience, department rank and reputation, funding, industry engagement, and academic output of rhinology faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, academic metrics (publications, citations, h-index, National Institutes of Health [NIH] funding), program rankings, and industry compensation for academic U.S. rhinologists through June 2022 were collected and compared between academic rank and years of experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 278 rhinologists were included. Full professors had greater academic metrics (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) and industry compensation (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) than associate professors, assistant professors, and private practice rhinologists. Full professors were also more likely to receive NIH funding than other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Years of experience and industry compensation positively correlated with each other and with academic metrics (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) with significant jumps between the 5th-9th and 10th-14th years of practice (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, early career (≤8 years) rhinologists published more articles per year than later career (>8 years) rhinologists (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Rhinologists at Doximity top 10 and 25 residency programs by reputation and research output and top 50 U.S. News and World Report departments had significantly greater academic metrics and NIH funding compared to those who were not (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Top 10 and 25 reputations was associated with increased industry compensation (<i>p</i> = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although early career rhinologists published more frequently, ascending professorial rank, years of experience, and affiliation with top-ranked departments were associated with total academic productivity. Industry engagement was linked to reputation and years of experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"11 3","pages":"340-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Academic productivity is believed to be correlated with years of experience and departmental rank, yet there is a paucity of granular academic data between rhinology faculty regarding departmental rank and industry engagement, and how these relate to experience.

Objective: To examine the interrelationships between experience, department rank and reputation, funding, industry engagement, and academic output of rhinology faculty.

Methods: Demographics, academic metrics (publications, citations, h-index, National Institutes of Health [NIH] funding), program rankings, and industry compensation for academic U.S. rhinologists through June 2022 were collected and compared between academic rank and years of experience.

Results: A cohort of 278 rhinologists were included. Full professors had greater academic metrics (all p < 0.001) and industry compensation (all p < 0.05) than associate professors, assistant professors, and private practice rhinologists. Full professors were also more likely to receive NIH funding than other groups (p < 0.001). Years of experience and industry compensation positively correlated with each other and with academic metrics (all p < 0.001) with significant jumps between the 5th-9th and 10th-14th years of practice (p < 0.001). However, early career (≤8 years) rhinologists published more articles per year than later career (>8 years) rhinologists (p < 0.001). Rhinologists at Doximity top 10 and 25 residency programs by reputation and research output and top 50 U.S. News and World Report departments had significantly greater academic metrics and NIH funding compared to those who were not (p < 0.001). Top 10 and 25 reputations was associated with increased industry compensation (p = 0.024).

Conclusions: Although early career rhinologists published more frequently, ascending professorial rank, years of experience, and affiliation with top-ranked departments were associated with total academic productivity. Industry engagement was linked to reputation and years of experience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

奖学金培训的美国学术鼻科医生的学术生产力和行业趋势。
背景:学术生产力被认为与多年的经验和部门级别相关,然而缺乏关于部门级别和行业参与以及这些与经验之间关系的详细学术数据。目的:探讨鼻科教师的经验、院系等级与声誉、经费、行业参与和学术产出之间的相互关系。方法:收集截至2022年6月美国学术鼻科医生的人口统计数据、学术指标(出版物、引用、h指数、美国国立卫生研究院[NIH]资助)、项目排名和行业薪酬,并将学术排名与多年经验进行比较。结果:纳入278名鼻科医生。正教授有更高的学术指标(所有p p p p p 8年),鼻科医生(p p p = 0.024)。结论:尽管早期职业鼻科医生发表文章的频率更高,但晋升的教授级别、多年的经验以及与顶级部门的联系与总体学术生产力有关。行业参与度与声誉和多年经验有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信