Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes between traumatic and nontraumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

IF 1.4 Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.70000
Ru Tang, Shi-Yao Zhang, Jia-Yao Zhou, Yue-Long Gu, Song Mao, Wei-Tian Zhang
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes between traumatic and nontraumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.","authors":"Ru Tang, Shi-Yao Zhang, Jia-Yao Zhou, Yue-Long Gu, Song Mao, Wei-Tian Zhang","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with traumatic and nontraumatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CSF rhinorrhea patients admitted between January 2007 and December 2022 were recruited and categorized into traumatic and nontraumatic groups. The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 94 patients with traumatic and 49 patients with nontraumatic CSF rhinorrhea were included. The prevalence of meningitis was significantly higher in traumatic CSF rhinorrhea patients (<i>p</i> = 0.012). Multifocal defects were more frequent in the traumatic group, while sphenoidal defects were significantly correlated with nontraumatic CSF rhinorrhea. Frontal defects were commonly identified in CSF rhinorrhea patients with meningitis than in those without, though no statistical significance was reported. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that male sex, iatrogenic traumatic CSF leak, and pneumonitis are independent factors for development of meningitis. An endoscopic approach combined with an external incision was performed in one patient and 24 patients in nontraumatic and traumatic groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Combined vascularized grafts were more commonly used in patients with traumatic CSF rhinorrhea (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No statistical difference in the success rate (100% vs. 97.9%) was documented between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multifocal defects and meningitis were more prevalent in traumatic CSF rhinorrhea patients, leading to increased complexity in treatment management. Iatrogenic rather than accidental traumatic CSF rhinorrhea is an independent risk factor for development of meningitis. The endoscopic combined coronal extradural approach, in conjunction with various vascularized flaps, can effectively supplement skull base reconstruction, especially for complex traumatic CSF rhinorrhea.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"11 3","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with traumatic and nontraumatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea.

Methods: CSF rhinorrhea patients admitted between January 2007 and December 2022 were recruited and categorized into traumatic and nontraumatic groups. The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results: A total of 94 patients with traumatic and 49 patients with nontraumatic CSF rhinorrhea were included. The prevalence of meningitis was significantly higher in traumatic CSF rhinorrhea patients (p = 0.012). Multifocal defects were more frequent in the traumatic group, while sphenoidal defects were significantly correlated with nontraumatic CSF rhinorrhea. Frontal defects were commonly identified in CSF rhinorrhea patients with meningitis than in those without, though no statistical significance was reported. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that male sex, iatrogenic traumatic CSF leak, and pneumonitis are independent factors for development of meningitis. An endoscopic approach combined with an external incision was performed in one patient and 24 patients in nontraumatic and traumatic groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Combined vascularized grafts were more commonly used in patients with traumatic CSF rhinorrhea (p < 0.05). No statistical difference in the success rate (100% vs. 97.9%) was documented between the two groups.

Conclusions: Multifocal defects and meningitis were more prevalent in traumatic CSF rhinorrhea patients, leading to increased complexity in treatment management. Iatrogenic rather than accidental traumatic CSF rhinorrhea is an independent risk factor for development of meningitis. The endoscopic combined coronal extradural approach, in conjunction with various vascularized flaps, can effectively supplement skull base reconstruction, especially for complex traumatic CSF rhinorrhea.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外伤性和非外伤性脑脊液鼻漏的临床特征和手术结果。
目的:比较外伤性和非外伤性脑脊液鼻漏患者的临床特点和手术效果。方法:选取2007年1月至2022年12月收治的脑脊液鼻漏患者,分为创伤性和非创伤性两组。比较两组患者的临床特点及手术效果。结果:外伤性脑脊液鼻漏94例,非外伤性脑脊液鼻漏49例。外伤性脑脊液鼻漏患者的脑膜炎患病率明显高于其他患者(p = 0.012)。创伤组多灶性缺损发生率较高,而蝶窦缺损与非创伤性脑脊液鼻漏发生率显著相关。脑脊液鼻漏合并脑膜炎的患者比未合并脑膜炎的患者更容易发现额叶缺损,但没有统计学意义的报道。多因素logistic回归分析显示,男性、医源性外伤性脑脊液泄漏和肺炎是脑膜炎发生的独立因素。内镜下入路联合外切口1例,创伤组和非创伤组分别有24例(p = 0.001)。结论:外伤性脑脊液鼻漏患者多灶性缺损和脑膜炎更为普遍,导致治疗管理的复杂性增加。医源性而非意外外伤性脑脊液鼻漏是脑膜炎发展的独立危险因素。内镜下联合冠状硬膜外入路,配合多种带血管皮瓣,可有效补充颅底重建,尤其适用于复杂外伤性脑脊液鼻漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信