Evaluation of diphtheria surveillance system in Kaduna State, Nigeria, July 2023 - December 2023.

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-08-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1379
Uwaifiokun J Okhuarobo, Samuel A Owoicho, Jeremiah Daikwo, Isiaq H Shehu, Emmanuel Omomoh, Mfon-Obong P Ibara, Abiola O Oshunniyi, Oladipo O Ogunbode, Fatima Saleh
{"title":"Evaluation of diphtheria surveillance system in Kaduna State, Nigeria, July 2023 - December 2023.","authors":"Uwaifiokun J Okhuarobo, Samuel A Owoicho, Jeremiah Daikwo, Isiaq H Shehu, Emmanuel Omomoh, Mfon-Obong P Ibara, Abiola O Oshunniyi, Oladipo O Ogunbode, Fatima Saleh","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The re-emergence of the diphtheria outbreak in Nigeria raises concern about the surveillance system's capability to detect, prepare for and respond to outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness and attributes of the diphtheria surveillance system in Kaduna State, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kaduna State, northwest Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study, using a mixed-method approach, was adopted. It comprised a survey, a record review of the 2023 outbreak and key informant interviews. A pre-tested semi-structured self-administered questionnaire and an interview guide, adapted from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2001) guidelines on surveillance evaluation, were utilised. Three stakeholders were interviewed, 21 surveillance officers were surveyed, and eight surveillance attributes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outbreak data had 67% (<i>n</i> = 382/573) missing values. Eighty-two per cent (<i>n</i> = 432/525) of cases had an investigation initiated within 48 hours. All 21 (100%) respondents reported ease in filling in forms and a willingness to continue participating in the system, which could correctly identify cases. Twelve (57%) of the 21 respondents stated that private health facilities submitted their reports. Of the 12 respondents who reported modifications in the system, six (50%) stated < 1 month for implementation. Nineteen (90%) of the 21 respondents reported inadequate resources, while six (67%) of the nine respondents who reported receiving stipends indicated these were provided by partner organisations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The system was acceptable to stakeholders, useful in detecting outbreaks, simple in data collection, flexible in accommodating changes and sensitive in identifying cases. However, resource constraints pose a threat to its stability. We recommend providing adequate resources, improving data quality and reporting from private health facilities.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study underscores areas for improvement in the diphtheria surveillance system, highlighting the potential for targeted interventions to overhaul the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 1","pages":"1379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The re-emergence of the diphtheria outbreak in Nigeria raises concern about the surveillance system's capability to detect, prepare for and respond to outbreaks.

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness and attributes of the diphtheria surveillance system in Kaduna State, Nigeria.

Setting: Kaduna State, northwest Nigeria.

Methods: An observational study, using a mixed-method approach, was adopted. It comprised a survey, a record review of the 2023 outbreak and key informant interviews. A pre-tested semi-structured self-administered questionnaire and an interview guide, adapted from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2001) guidelines on surveillance evaluation, were utilised. Three stakeholders were interviewed, 21 surveillance officers were surveyed, and eight surveillance attributes were assessed.

Results: The outbreak data had 67% (n = 382/573) missing values. Eighty-two per cent (n = 432/525) of cases had an investigation initiated within 48 hours. All 21 (100%) respondents reported ease in filling in forms and a willingness to continue participating in the system, which could correctly identify cases. Twelve (57%) of the 21 respondents stated that private health facilities submitted their reports. Of the 12 respondents who reported modifications in the system, six (50%) stated < 1 month for implementation. Nineteen (90%) of the 21 respondents reported inadequate resources, while six (67%) of the nine respondents who reported receiving stipends indicated these were provided by partner organisations.

Conclusion: The system was acceptable to stakeholders, useful in detecting outbreaks, simple in data collection, flexible in accommodating changes and sensitive in identifying cases. However, resource constraints pose a threat to its stability. We recommend providing adequate resources, improving data quality and reporting from private health facilities.

Contribution: The study underscores areas for improvement in the diphtheria surveillance system, highlighting the potential for targeted interventions to overhaul the system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2023年7月至2023年12月对尼日利亚卡杜纳州白喉监测系统进行评估。
背景:尼日利亚白喉疫情的再次出现引起了人们对监测系统发现、准备和应对疫情的能力的关注。目的:评价尼日利亚卡杜纳州白喉监测系统的有效性和属性。环境:尼日利亚西北部卡杜纳州。方法:采用观察性研究,采用混合方法。它包括一项调查、对2023年疫情的记录审查和对关键线人的采访。采用了根据疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)(2001年)监测评估准则改编的预先测试的半结构化自我管理问卷和访谈指南。对3名利益相关者进行了访谈,对21名监控人员进行了调查,并对8项监控属性进行了评估。结果:爆发数据有67% (n = 382/573)缺失值。82% (n = 432/525)的案件在48小时内开始调查。所有21名(100%)受访者表示,填写表格很容易,并愿意继续参与该系统,该系统可以正确识别病例。21个答复者中有12个(57%)说,私营保健机构提交了报告。在报告系统修改的12个应答者中,6个(50%)表示实施时间< 1个月。21个受访者中有19个(90%)表示资源不足,而9个接受津贴的受访者中有6个(67%)表示这些津贴是由合作伙伴组织提供的。结论:该系统为利益相关方所接受,检测疫情有用,数据收集简单,适应变化灵活,识别病例敏感。然而,资源限制对其稳定性构成威胁。我们建议提供充足的资源,提高数据质量,并由私营卫生设施提供报告。贡献:该研究强调了白喉监测系统有待改进的领域,强调了对该系统进行有针对性干预的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信