Early postnatal characteristics and differential diagnosis of choledochal cyst and cystic biliary atresia.

IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yu Tian, Shuai Chen, Can Ji, Xin-Ping Wang, Mao Ye, Xin-Yuan Chen, Jian-Feng Luo, Xu Li, Long Li
{"title":"Early postnatal characteristics and differential diagnosis of choledochal cyst and cystic biliary atresia.","authors":"Yu Tian, Shuai Chen, Can Ji, Xin-Ping Wang, Mao Ye, Xin-Yuan Chen, Jian-Feng Luo, Xu Li, Long Li","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i33.108369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Choledochal cysts (CC) and cystic biliary atresia (CBA) present similarly in early infancy but require different treatment approaches. While CC surgery can be delayed until 3-6 months of age in asymptomatic patients, CBA requires intervention within 60 days to prevent cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a diagnostic model for early differentiation between these conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 319 patients with hepatic hilar cysts (< 60 days old at surgery) were retrospectively analyzed; these patients were treated at three hospitals between 2011 and 2022. Clinical features including biochemical markers and ultrasonographic measurements were compared between CC (<i>n</i> = 274) and CBA (<i>n</i> = 45) groups. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified key diagnostic features, and 11 machine learning models were developed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CBA group showed higher levels of total bile acid, total bilirubin, γ-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, and direct bilirubin, while longitudinal diameter of the cysts and transverse diameter of the cysts were larger in the CC group. The multilayer perceptron model demonstrated optimal performance with 95.8% accuracy, 92.9% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.990. Decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical utility. Based on the model, we developed user-friendly diagnostic software for clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our machine learning approach differentiates CC from CBA in early infancy using routinely available clinical parameters. Early accurate diagnosis facilitates timely surgical intervention for CBA cases, potentially improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 33","pages":"108369"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i33.108369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Choledochal cysts (CC) and cystic biliary atresia (CBA) present similarly in early infancy but require different treatment approaches. While CC surgery can be delayed until 3-6 months of age in asymptomatic patients, CBA requires intervention within 60 days to prevent cirrhosis.

Aim: To develop a diagnostic model for early differentiation between these conditions.

Methods: A total of 319 patients with hepatic hilar cysts (< 60 days old at surgery) were retrospectively analyzed; these patients were treated at three hospitals between 2011 and 2022. Clinical features including biochemical markers and ultrasonographic measurements were compared between CC (n = 274) and CBA (n = 45) groups. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified key diagnostic features, and 11 machine learning models were developed and compared.

Results: The CBA group showed higher levels of total bile acid, total bilirubin, γ-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, and direct bilirubin, while longitudinal diameter of the cysts and transverse diameter of the cysts were larger in the CC group. The multilayer perceptron model demonstrated optimal performance with 95.8% accuracy, 92.9% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.990. Decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical utility. Based on the model, we developed user-friendly diagnostic software for clinical implementation.

Conclusion: Our machine learning approach differentiates CC from CBA in early infancy using routinely available clinical parameters. Early accurate diagnosis facilitates timely surgical intervention for CBA cases, potentially improving patient outcomes.

胆总管囊肿与胆囊性胆道闭锁的产后早期特征及鉴别诊断。
背景:胆总管囊肿(CC)和胆囊性胆道闭锁(CBA)在婴儿早期表现相似,但需要不同的治疗方法。对于无症状患者,CC手术可延迟至3-6个月,而CBA则需要在60天内进行干预以预防肝硬化。目的:建立一种早期鉴别这些疾病的诊断模型。方法:回顾性分析319例肝门囊肿(术后小于60 d)患者的临床资料;这些患者在2011年至2022年期间在三家医院接受治疗。比较CC组(n = 274)和CBA组(n = 45)的临床特征,包括生化指标和超声指标。最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归确定了关键的诊断特征,并开发和比较了11个机器学习模型。结果:CBA组总胆汁酸、总胆红素、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、丙氨酸转氨酶及直接胆红素水平均较高,而CC组囊肿纵径和横径均较大。多层感知器模型的准确率为95.8%,灵敏度为92.9%,特异度为96.3%,曲线下面积为0.990。决策曲线分析证实了其临床应用价值。基于该模型,我们开发了便于临床实施的人性化诊断软件。结论:我们的机器学习方法通过常规临床参数区分婴儿期早期CC和CBA。早期准确的诊断有助于对CBA病例进行及时的手术干预,有可能改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信