Comparison of novel DiaRD-HBV DNA qPCR kit with the artus HBV QS-RGQ kit for quantification of HBV DNA in clinical samples.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6053
Ülker Çuhaci, Hande Toptan, Bengül Durmaz, Mehmet Köroğlu, Rıza Durmaz
{"title":"Comparison of novel DiaRD-HBV DNA qPCR kit with the <i>artus</i> HBV QS-RGQ kit for quantification of HBV DNA in clinical samples.","authors":"Ülker Çuhaci, Hande Toptan, Bengül Durmaz, Mehmet Köroğlu, Rıza Durmaz","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Hepatitis B virus (HBV) leads to widespread chronic infections that may result in long-term complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The use of sensitive molecular methods for HBV DNA quantitation has provided significant contributions for diagnosis and monitoring of disease. The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of a novel DiaRD HBV qPCR kit (novel kit) in comparison with the <i>artus</i> HBV QS-RGQ kit (comparator kit).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 288 plasma samples-105 HBV DNA-positive and 183 HBV DNA-negative-were tested using both kits. The diagnostic and quantitative results of the novel kit were compared to those of the comparator kit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The novel kit had very high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with rates of >99.9%. Comparative analyses conducted on 105 HBV DNA-positive samples showed no significant differences of ≥ 1 log<sub>10</sub> between the novel kit and comparator kit. The median viral load detected by the novel kit was 6.21 × 10<sup>7</sup> IU/mL (range: 0.9 × 10<sup>1</sup> to 2.98 × 10<sup>9</sup>) as compared to the comparator kit where it was 5.43 × 10<sup>7</sup> IU/mL (range: 1.00 × 10<sup>1</sup> to 2.87 × 10<sup>9</sup>). The correlation plot demonstrated a strong linear relationship (R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.9655) between the two kits. Reproducibility testing performed on three different HVB DNA loads showed the overall coefficient of variations <5%. The mean difference between the quantitative results of two kits was -0.03 log IU/mL by Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The result of the current study indicates that this novel DiaRD HBV qPCR kit can be used in routine diagnosis and monitoring of HBV infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 4","pages":"1003-1013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) leads to widespread chronic infections that may result in long-term complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The use of sensitive molecular methods for HBV DNA quantitation has provided significant contributions for diagnosis and monitoring of disease. The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of a novel DiaRD HBV qPCR kit (novel kit) in comparison with the artus HBV QS-RGQ kit (comparator kit).

Materials and methods: A total of 288 plasma samples-105 HBV DNA-positive and 183 HBV DNA-negative-were tested using both kits. The diagnostic and quantitative results of the novel kit were compared to those of the comparator kit.

Results: The novel kit had very high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with rates of >99.9%. Comparative analyses conducted on 105 HBV DNA-positive samples showed no significant differences of ≥ 1 log10 between the novel kit and comparator kit. The median viral load detected by the novel kit was 6.21 × 107 IU/mL (range: 0.9 × 101 to 2.98 × 109) as compared to the comparator kit where it was 5.43 × 107 IU/mL (range: 1.00 × 101 to 2.87 × 109). The correlation plot demonstrated a strong linear relationship (R2 value of 0.9655) between the two kits. Reproducibility testing performed on three different HVB DNA loads showed the overall coefficient of variations <5%. The mean difference between the quantitative results of two kits was -0.03 log IU/mL by Bland-Altman analysis.

Conclusion: The result of the current study indicates that this novel DiaRD HBV qPCR kit can be used in routine diagnosis and monitoring of HBV infections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新型DiaRD-HBV DNA qPCR试剂盒与artus HBV QS-RGQ试剂盒用于临床样品中HBV DNA定量的比较
背景/目的:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)导致广泛的慢性感染,可能导致长期并发症,如肝硬化和肝细胞癌。使用敏感的分子方法进行HBV DNA定量为疾病的诊断和监测提供了重大贡献。本研究旨在评估一种新型DiaRD HBV qPCR试剂盒(novel kit)与artus HBV QS-RGQ试剂盒(comparator kit)的诊断性能。材料与方法:采用两种试剂盒检测288份血浆样本,其中HBV dna阳性105份,HBV dna阴性183份。将新试剂盒的诊断和定量结果与比较试剂盒进行比较。结果:该试剂盒具有很高的敏感性、特异性和准确性,检测准确率为99.9%。对105份HBV dna阳性样本进行的比较分析显示,新型试剂盒与比较试剂盒之间无显著差异≥1 log10。新试剂盒检测到的中位病毒载量为6.21 × 107 IU/mL(范围:0.9 × 101 ~ 2.98 × 109),而比较试剂盒检测到的中位病毒载量为5.43 × 107 IU/mL(范围:1.00 × 101 ~ 2.87 × 109)。相关图显示,两个试剂盒之间存在较强的线性关系(R2值为0.9655)。结论:本研究结果表明,新型DiaRD HBV qPCR试剂盒可用于HBV感染的常规诊断和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信