Simone La Padula, Giovanni Esposito, Alessio Ciccarelli, Concetta Errico, Rosita Pensato, Barbara Hersant, Jean Paul Meningaud, Giovanni Roccaro, Francesco D'Andrea, Fabrizio Schonauer
{"title":"The Versatility of the Fat-extended, Muscle-sparing Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Simone La Padula, Giovanni Esposito, Alessio Ciccarelli, Concetta Errico, Rosita Pensato, Barbara Hersant, Jean Paul Meningaud, Giovanni Roccaro, Francesco D'Andrea, Fabrizio Schonauer","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap is widely used in breast reconstruction, often combined with implants, due to its reliable vascular axis. However, traditional techniques can result in functional deficits and complications. The fat-extended muscle-sparing LD flap (FEMSLDF) was developed to optimize breast volume restoration while minimizing complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with the FEMSLDF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 172 patients who underwent FEMSLDF-based breast reconstruction (immediate, delayed, or salvage) between January 2018 and November 2023. The surgical technique prioritized preserving the LD muscle while using surrounding subcutaneous fat for volume restoration. Data on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including BREAST-Q modules and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 47 ± 5.42 years, with a mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 3.2 months. The mean surgical time was 65 ± 23.1 minutes, with an average hospital stay of 2-3 days. Only 1 minor complication (0.58% incidence) was reported. BREAST-Q scores showed significant improvements in psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas the LD module indicated preserved muscle functionality (<i>P</i> = 0.2). Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores reflected high patient satisfaction with the dorsal scar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FEMSLDF is a versatile, safe, and effective technique for breast reconstruction, achieving good aesthetic and functional outcomes with minimal complications. It represents a valuable alternative to traditional and hybrid reconstruction methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap is widely used in breast reconstruction, often combined with implants, due to its reliable vascular axis. However, traditional techniques can result in functional deficits and complications. The fat-extended muscle-sparing LD flap (FEMSLDF) was developed to optimize breast volume restoration while minimizing complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with the FEMSLDF.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 172 patients who underwent FEMSLDF-based breast reconstruction (immediate, delayed, or salvage) between January 2018 and November 2023. The surgical technique prioritized preserving the LD muscle while using surrounding subcutaneous fat for volume restoration. Data on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including BREAST-Q modules and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
Results: The mean age of patients was 47 ± 5.42 years, with a mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 3.2 months. The mean surgical time was 65 ± 23.1 minutes, with an average hospital stay of 2-3 days. Only 1 minor complication (0.58% incidence) was reported. BREAST-Q scores showed significant improvements in psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being (P < 0.05), whereas the LD module indicated preserved muscle functionality (P = 0.2). Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores reflected high patient satisfaction with the dorsal scar.
Conclusions: The FEMSLDF is a versatile, safe, and effective technique for breast reconstruction, achieving good aesthetic and functional outcomes with minimal complications. It represents a valuable alternative to traditional and hybrid reconstruction methods.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.