Kerilyn Godbe, Cole Bird, Dylan Vance, Niaman Nazir, Lyndsey Kilgore, German Berbel, David Megee, Ravi Garg, James Butterworth, Rebecca Farmer
{"title":"Plastics Makes Perfect: A Collaborative, Cost-effective Approach to Multilevel Cadaveric Learning.","authors":"Kerilyn Godbe, Cole Bird, Dylan Vance, Niaman Nazir, Lyndsey Kilgore, German Berbel, David Megee, Ravi Garg, James Butterworth, Rebecca Farmer","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical students are losing hands-on experience during surgical clerkships, and residents and faculty are expected to teach them with minimal educational training. A multilevel cadaveric curriculum (MCC) was implemented to improve surgical education for all groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the MCC, a senior resident verbally guided 2 medical students through a procedure on a cadaver, whereas a junior resident performed the procedure on the contralateral side under faculty guidance. Educational benefits were assessed via pre- and postsurveys, with costs shared between surgical departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six MCC laboratory sessions were performed from 2023 to 2024, with a survey response rate of 89.6% (173 of 193). The laboratory sessions increased medical students' confidence in identifying procedural anatomy (3.9 versus 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), using surgical instruments (4.3 versus 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and assisting in the operating room (4.8 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Both junior and senior residents, respectively, noted increased confidence in marking incisions (3.1 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.9 versus 6.2, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), identifying neurovascular structures (2.7 versus 5.1, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.6 versus 6.0, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), completing procedures (2.0 versus 4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.0 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and teaching medical students (2.1 versus 4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 3.8 versus 5.5, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Faculty reported an increase in overall confidence in teaching ability (6.2 versus 6.5, <i>P</i> = 0.006) and providing feedback (6.2 versus 6.5, <i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This laboratory was a beneficial educational experience for medical students, residents, and faculty, with improved cadaveric access achieved through cost sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7081"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medical students are losing hands-on experience during surgical clerkships, and residents and faculty are expected to teach them with minimal educational training. A multilevel cadaveric curriculum (MCC) was implemented to improve surgical education for all groups.
Methods: In the MCC, a senior resident verbally guided 2 medical students through a procedure on a cadaver, whereas a junior resident performed the procedure on the contralateral side under faculty guidance. Educational benefits were assessed via pre- and postsurveys, with costs shared between surgical departments.
Results: Six MCC laboratory sessions were performed from 2023 to 2024, with a survey response rate of 89.6% (173 of 193). The laboratory sessions increased medical students' confidence in identifying procedural anatomy (3.9 versus 5.3, P < 0.0001), using surgical instruments (4.3 versus 5.3, P < 0.0001), and assisting in the operating room (4.8 versus 5.6, P < 0.0001). Both junior and senior residents, respectively, noted increased confidence in marking incisions (3.1 versus 5.6, P < 0.0001; 4.9 versus 6.2, P < 0.0001), identifying neurovascular structures (2.7 versus 5.1, P < 0.0001; 4.6 versus 6.0, P < 0.0001), completing procedures (2.0 versus 4.3, P < 0.0001; 4.0 versus 5.6, P < 0.0001), and teaching medical students (2.1 versus 4.3, P < 0.0001; 3.8 versus 5.5, P < 0.0001). Faculty reported an increase in overall confidence in teaching ability (6.2 versus 6.5, P = 0.006) and providing feedback (6.2 versus 6.5, P = 0.032).
Conclusions: This laboratory was a beneficial educational experience for medical students, residents, and faculty, with improved cadaveric access achieved through cost sharing.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.