Amy Gérin-Lajoie, Walter Adame-Gonzalez, Eve-Marie Frigon, Liana Guerra Sanches, Anna Nayouf, Denis Boire, Mahsa Dadar, Josefina Maranzano
{"title":"Ex vivo human brain volumetry: Validation of MRI measurements.","authors":"Amy Gérin-Lajoie, Walter Adame-Gonzalez, Eve-Marie Frigon, Liana Guerra Sanches, Anna Nayouf, Denis Boire, Mahsa Dadar, Josefina Maranzano","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The volume of in vivo human brains is determined with various MRI measurement tools that have not been assessed against a gold standard. The purpose of this study was to validate the MRI brain volumes by scanning ex vivo, in situ specimens, which allows the extraction of the brain after the scan to compare its volume with the gold-standard water displacement method (WDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 3T MRI T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, T<sub>1</sub>-weighted, and MP2RAGE images of seven anatomical heads fixed with an alcohol-formaldehyde solution were acquired. The gray and white matter were assessed using two methods: (i) a manual intensity-based threshold segmentation using Display (MINC-ToolKit) and (ii) an automatic deep learning-based segmentation tool (SynthSeg). The brains were extracted and their volumes measured with the WDM after the removal of their meninges and a midsagittal cut. Volumes from all methods were compared with the ground truth (WDM volumes) using a repeated-measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean brain volumes, in cubic centimeters, were 1111.14 ± 121.78 for WDM, 1020.29 ± 70.01 for manual T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, 1056.29 ± 90.54 for automatic T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, 1094.69 ± 100.51 for automatic T<sub>1</sub>-weighted, 1066.56 ± 96.52 for automatic magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo first inversion time, and 1156.18 ± 121.87 for automatic magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo second inversion time. All volumetry methods were significantly different (F = 17.874; p < 0.001) from the WDM volumes, except the automatic T<sub>1</sub>-weighted volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SynthSeg accurately determined the brain volume in ex vivo, in situ T<sub>1</sub>-weighted MRI scans. The results suggested that given the contrast similarity between the ex vivo and in vivo sequences, the brain volumes of clinical studies are most probably sufficiently accurate, with some degree of underestimation depending on the sequence used.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The volume of in vivo human brains is determined with various MRI measurement tools that have not been assessed against a gold standard. The purpose of this study was to validate the MRI brain volumes by scanning ex vivo, in situ specimens, which allows the extraction of the brain after the scan to compare its volume with the gold-standard water displacement method (WDM).
Methods: The 3T MRI T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and MP2RAGE images of seven anatomical heads fixed with an alcohol-formaldehyde solution were acquired. The gray and white matter were assessed using two methods: (i) a manual intensity-based threshold segmentation using Display (MINC-ToolKit) and (ii) an automatic deep learning-based segmentation tool (SynthSeg). The brains were extracted and their volumes measured with the WDM after the removal of their meninges and a midsagittal cut. Volumes from all methods were compared with the ground truth (WDM volumes) using a repeated-measures analysis of variance.
Results: Mean brain volumes, in cubic centimeters, were 1111.14 ± 121.78 for WDM, 1020.29 ± 70.01 for manual T2-weighted, 1056.29 ± 90.54 for automatic T2-weighted, 1094.69 ± 100.51 for automatic T1-weighted, 1066.56 ± 96.52 for automatic magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo first inversion time, and 1156.18 ± 121.87 for automatic magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo second inversion time. All volumetry methods were significantly different (F = 17.874; p < 0.001) from the WDM volumes, except the automatic T1-weighted volumes.
Conclusion: SynthSeg accurately determined the brain volume in ex vivo, in situ T1-weighted MRI scans. The results suggested that given the contrast similarity between the ex vivo and in vivo sequences, the brain volumes of clinical studies are most probably sufficiently accurate, with some degree of underestimation depending on the sequence used.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.