Pamela A Kuhlmann, Dante L Di Nucci, Silvina N Valdez, Juan I Marfia, Ignacio Smith, María V Miranda, Candelaria Sanchez Fernandez, Emanuel Grassi, Erik Ruuth, Karina A Salvatierra
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Wild Mammals from Atlantic Forest Region in Misiones province, Argentina.","authors":"Pamela A Kuhlmann, Dante L Di Nucci, Silvina N Valdez, Juan I Marfia, Ignacio Smith, María V Miranda, Candelaria Sanchez Fernandez, Emanuel Grassi, Erik Ruuth, Karina A Salvatierra","doi":"10.7589/JWD-D-25-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is evidence that both domestic and wild animals are susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19 in humans. However, the extent of infection in native wild mammals and the most susceptible species to SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 exposure in native wild mammals from the Misiones region, a subtropical area in northeastern Argentina, within the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was designed using serum samples from wild mammals that entered the Centro de Rescate, Rehabilitación y Recría de Fauna Silvestre Güirá Oga for veterinary care between December 2019 and March 2022. Epidemiological data were obtained from veterinary records, and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected using a novel bridge multispecies ELISA. A total of 115 serum samples from 26 wild mammal species were analyzed, revealing antibodies in 20 samples and a seroprevalence of 17.4% (95% confidence interval 11.5-25.3%). Antibodies were detected in 13 species, including native wild mammals in Argentina. These findings indicate that certain wildlife species may be infected by this virus, but do not provide evidence that any of the tested animals are reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2, as the study only addressed exposure. The results underscore the importance of continued surveillance to understand the ecological impacts of SARS-CoV-2, prevent zoonotic transmission, and protect both wildlife and human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":17602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-25-00003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is evidence that both domestic and wild animals are susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19 in humans. However, the extent of infection in native wild mammals and the most susceptible species to SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 exposure in native wild mammals from the Misiones region, a subtropical area in northeastern Argentina, within the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was designed using serum samples from wild mammals that entered the Centro de Rescate, Rehabilitación y Recría de Fauna Silvestre Güirá Oga for veterinary care between December 2019 and March 2022. Epidemiological data were obtained from veterinary records, and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected using a novel bridge multispecies ELISA. A total of 115 serum samples from 26 wild mammal species were analyzed, revealing antibodies in 20 samples and a seroprevalence of 17.4% (95% confidence interval 11.5-25.3%). Antibodies were detected in 13 species, including native wild mammals in Argentina. These findings indicate that certain wildlife species may be infected by this virus, but do not provide evidence that any of the tested animals are reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2, as the study only addressed exposure. The results underscore the importance of continued surveillance to understand the ecological impacts of SARS-CoV-2, prevent zoonotic transmission, and protect both wildlife and human health.
有证据表明,家畜和野生动物都容易感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2),即导致人类感染COVID-19的病毒。然而,本地野生哺乳动物和对SARS-CoV-2最易感的物种的感染程度仍不清楚。我们评估了阿根廷东北部米西奥内斯地区(上帕拉那大西洋森林生态区内的亚热带地区)本地野生哺乳动物的SARS-CoV-2暴露情况。使用2019年12月至2022年3月期间进入Rehabilitación y Recría de Fauna Silvestre g ir Oga中心进行兽医护理的野生哺乳动物血清样本,设计了一项描述性横断面研究。从兽医记录中获取流行病学数据,并使用新型桥式多种ELISA检测SARS-CoV-2抗体。共收集了26种野生哺乳动物115份血清样本,其中20份血清抗体阳性率为17.4%(95%可信区间为11.5 ~ 25.3%)。在包括阿根廷本土野生哺乳动物在内的13种动物中检测到抗体。这些发现表明,某些野生动物物种可能被这种病毒感染,但没有提供证据表明任何受测动物都是SARS-CoV-2的宿主,因为这项研究只涉及接触。这些结果强调了持续监测的重要性,以了解SARS-CoV-2的生态影响,防止人畜共患传播,保护野生动物和人类健康。
期刊介绍:
The JWD publishes reports of wildlife disease investigations, research papers, brief research notes, case and epizootic reports, review articles, and book reviews. The JWD publishes the results of original research and observations dealing with all aspects of infectious, parasitic, toxic, nutritional, physiologic, developmental and neoplastic diseases, environmental contamination, and other factors impinging on the health and survival of free-living or occasionally captive populations of wild animals, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Papers on zoonoses involving wildlife and on chemical immobilization of wild animals are also published. Manuscripts dealing with surveys and case reports may be published in the Journal provided that they contain significant new information or have significance for better understanding health and disease in wild populations. Authors are encouraged to address the wildlife management implications of their studies, where appropriate.