Direct Oral Anticoagulant Transition Strategies Using Anti-Xa Concentrations Upon Intensive Care Unit Admission.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mariah I Sigala, Corey V Dinunno, Chelsea N Lopez, Luma Succar, Jenny H Petkova, Edward A Graviss, Duc T Nguyen, Kevin R Donahue
{"title":"Direct Oral Anticoagulant Transition Strategies Using Anti-Xa Concentrations Upon Intensive Care Unit Admission.","authors":"Mariah I Sigala, Corey V Dinunno, Chelsea N Lopez, Luma Succar, Jenny H Petkova, Edward A Graviss, Duc T Nguyen, Kevin R Donahue","doi":"10.1177/87551225251372486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The increased utilization of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations. Critically ill populations are at risk of bleeding secondary to FXaI accumulation in the setting of end-organ dysfunction. To mitigate this risk, an FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided approach to transitioning between oral and parenteral anticoagulation has been explored. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the incidence of bleeding upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 2 different FXaI transition strategies: concentration versus non-concentration-guided. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2022 with objective evidence of FXaI exposure within 48 hours preceding ICU admission. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis related to a bleeding event, received a non-FXaI anticoagulant 48 hours preceding ICU admission, remained off anticoagulation during their ICU admission, or underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 5 days of ICU admission. Thromboembolic events were evaluated as a secondary endpoint. <b>Results:</b> A total of 433 patients (184 concentration-guided vs 249 non-concentration-guided) were included. There was no difference in major bleeding between groups (2.7% in concentration-guided vs 3.6% in non-concentration-guided; <i>P</i> = 0.79). Thromboembolic complications were similar between groups (1.6% in concentration-guided vs 2.0% in non-concentration-guided; <i>P</i> = 1.00) despite a longer time from last FXaI dose to anticoagulant transition in the concentration-guided group (29.9 hours vs 19.4 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusion and relevance:</b> Use of FXaI concentrations to guide anticoagulation transition in the ICU had no impact on major bleeding events or thromboembolic complications. Further analyses are needed to validate FXaI concentration-guided strategies and solidify anti-Xa cutoffs to create a standardized approach to FXaI transitions in the critically ill patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251372486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251372486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increased utilization of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations. Critically ill populations are at risk of bleeding secondary to FXaI accumulation in the setting of end-organ dysfunction. To mitigate this risk, an FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided approach to transitioning between oral and parenteral anticoagulation has been explored. Objective: To compare the incidence of bleeding upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 2 different FXaI transition strategies: concentration versus non-concentration-guided. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2022 with objective evidence of FXaI exposure within 48 hours preceding ICU admission. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis related to a bleeding event, received a non-FXaI anticoagulant 48 hours preceding ICU admission, remained off anticoagulation during their ICU admission, or underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 5 days of ICU admission. Thromboembolic events were evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 433 patients (184 concentration-guided vs 249 non-concentration-guided) were included. There was no difference in major bleeding between groups (2.7% in concentration-guided vs 3.6% in non-concentration-guided; P = 0.79). Thromboembolic complications were similar between groups (1.6% in concentration-guided vs 2.0% in non-concentration-guided; P = 1.00) despite a longer time from last FXaI dose to anticoagulant transition in the concentration-guided group (29.9 hours vs 19.4 hours; P < 0.01). Conclusion and relevance: Use of FXaI concentrations to guide anticoagulation transition in the ICU had no impact on major bleeding events or thromboembolic complications. Further analyses are needed to validate FXaI concentration-guided strategies and solidify anti-Xa cutoffs to create a standardized approach to FXaI transitions in the critically ill patient population.

在重症监护病房入院时使用抗xa浓度的直接口服抗凝过渡策略。
背景:口服Xa因子抑制剂(FXaI)的使用增加,导致人们对FXaI特异性抗Xa浓度的临床应用越来越感兴趣。危重患者在终末器官功能障碍的情况下,有继发于FXaI积累的出血风险。为了降低这种风险,研究人员探索了一种FXaI抗xa浓度引导的方法,在口服和肠外抗凝之间过渡。目的:比较两种不同的FXaI转换策略:浓度与非浓度引导下ICU入院时出血的发生率。方法:我们对2019年1月至2022年5月期间入院的患者进行回顾性图表回顾,这些患者在入院前48小时内有客观证据表明暴露于FXaI。如果患者入院时的初步诊断与出血事件有关,在入院前48小时接受了非fxai抗凝剂,在入院期间仍未使用抗凝剂,或接受了外科手术,则将患者排除在外。主要观察指标为入院后5天内大出血的发生率。血栓栓塞事件作为次要终点进行评估。结果:共纳入433例患者(浓度引导184例,非浓度引导249例)。两组间大出血发生率无差异(浓度引导组2.7% vs非浓度引导组3.6%;P = 0.79)。两组间血栓栓塞并发症相似(浓度引导组为1.6%,非浓度引导组为2.0%,P = 1.00),但浓度引导组从最后一次给药到抗凝过渡时间较长(29.9 h, 19.4 h, P < 0.01)。结论及意义:在ICU中使用FXaI浓度指导抗凝过渡对大出血事件或血栓栓塞并发症无影响。需要进一步的分析来验证FXaI浓度指导策略,并巩固抗xa截止点,以创建危重患者人群中FXaI转换的标准化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信