Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Novel Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S533031
Tao Zhang, Zi-Han Nan, Xiao-Xuan Fan, Jing-Xiao Pang, Cong-Cong Zhao, Yan Xin, Zhen-Jie Hu, Shao-Han Guo
{"title":"Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Novel Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.","authors":"Tao Zhang, Zi-Han Nan, Xiao-Xuan Fan, Jing-Xiao Pang, Cong-Cong Zhao, Yan Xin, Zhen-Jie Hu, Shao-Han Guo","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S533031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), facilitating early risk stratification and clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 1362 CRRT patients were analyzed, including 1224 from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (training cohort) and 138 from a Chinese hospital (external validation cohort). Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination, and Boruta algorithms. Nine machine learning models were constructed and compared, including Gaussian process (GP), ensemble methods (gradient boosting machine and eXtreme gradient boosting), and other classifiers. Model performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and other metrics. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the ML models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GP model demonstrated consistent predictive performance across all cohorts, with training (AUC=0.841, accuracy=76.8%, sensitivity=65.5%), internal validation (AUC=0.794, accuracy=73.4%, sensitivity=60.0%), and external validation (AUC=0.780, accuracy=63.8%, sensitivity=39.0%) sets. Key predictors included red cell distribution width, age, lactate, septic shock, and vasoactive drug use. SHAP analysis provided transparent insights into feature contributions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GP-based model accurately predicts 28-day mortality in CRRT patients and demonstrates strong generalizability. By integrating SHAP explanations, it offers clinicians an interpretable tool to identify high-risk patients early, potentially improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5535-5550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S533031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), facilitating early risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Patients and methods: Data from 1362 CRRT patients were analyzed, including 1224 from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (training cohort) and 138 from a Chinese hospital (external validation cohort). Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination, and Boruta algorithms. Nine machine learning models were constructed and compared, including Gaussian process (GP), ensemble methods (gradient boosting machine and eXtreme gradient boosting), and other classifiers. Model performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and other metrics. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the ML models.

Results: The GP model demonstrated consistent predictive performance across all cohorts, with training (AUC=0.841, accuracy=76.8%, sensitivity=65.5%), internal validation (AUC=0.794, accuracy=73.4%, sensitivity=60.0%), and external validation (AUC=0.780, accuracy=63.8%, sensitivity=39.0%) sets. Key predictors included red cell distribution width, age, lactate, septic shock, and vasoactive drug use. SHAP analysis provided transparent insights into feature contributions.

Conclusion: The GP-based model accurately predicts 28-day mortality in CRRT patients and demonstrates strong generalizability. By integrating SHAP explanations, it offers clinicians an interpretable tool to identify high-risk patients early, potentially improving outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测接受持续肾脏替代治疗的危重患者28天死亡率:一种新的可解释机器学习方法。
目的:本研究旨在开发和验证可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,以预测接受持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的危重患者28天全因死亡率,促进早期风险分层和临床决策。患者和方法:分析了1362例CRRT患者的数据,其中1224例来自重症监护医学信息市场IV数据库(培训队列),138例来自中国医院(外部验证队列)。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子、支持向量机递归特征消除和Boruta算法进行特征选择。构建并比较了9种机器学习模型,包括高斯过程(GP)、集成方法(梯度增强机和极端梯度增强)和其他分类器。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、决策曲线分析和其他指标来评估模型的性能。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法对ML模型进行解释。结果:GP模型在所有队列中表现出一致的预测性能,包括训练集(AUC=0.841,准确度=76.8%,灵敏度=65.5%)、内部验证集(AUC=0.794,准确度=73.4%,灵敏度=60.0%)和外部验证集(AUC=0.780,准确度=63.8%,灵敏度=39.0%)。主要预测因素包括红细胞分布宽度、年龄、乳酸、感染性休克和血管活性药物的使用。SHAP分析提供了对特性贡献的透明洞察。结论:基于gp的模型准确预测CRRT患者28天死亡率,具有较强的通用性。通过整合SHAP解释,它为临床医生提供了一种可解释的工具,可以早期识别高风险患者,从而潜在地改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信