Molnupiravir clinical trial simulation suggests that polymerase chain reaction underestimates antiviral potency against SARS-CoV-2.

IF 13.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Shadisadat Esmaeili, Katherine Owens, Ugo Avila-Ponce de Leon, Joseph F Standing, David M Lowe, Shengyuan Zhang, James A Watson, William Hk Schilling, Jessica Wagoner, Stephen J Polyak, Joshua T Schiffer
{"title":"Molnupiravir clinical trial simulation suggests that polymerase chain reaction underestimates antiviral potency against SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Shadisadat Esmaeili, Katherine Owens, Ugo Avila-Ponce de Leon, Joseph F Standing, David M Lowe, Shengyuan Zhang, James A Watson, William Hk Schilling, Jessica Wagoner, Stephen J Polyak, Joshua T Schiffer","doi":"10.1172/JCI192052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molnupiravir is an antiviral medicine that induces lethal copying errors during SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication. Molnupiravir reduced hospitalization in one pivotal trial by 50% and had variable effects on reducing viral RNA levels in three separate trials. We used mathematical models to simulate these trials and closely recapitulated their virologic outcomes. Model simulations suggest lower antiviral potency against pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants than against omicron. We estimate that in vitro assays underestimate in vivo potency 6-7 fold against omicron variants. Our model suggests that because polymerase chain reaction detects molnupiravir mutated variants, the true reduction in non-mutated viral RNA is underestimated by ~0.4 log10 in the two trials conducted while omicron variants dominated. Viral area under the curve estimates differ significantly between non-mutated and mutated viral RNA. Our results reinforce past work suggesting that in vitro assays are unreliable for estimating in vivo antiviral drug potency and suggest that virologic endpoints for respiratory virus clinical trials should be catered to the drug mechanism of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":15469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI192052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molnupiravir is an antiviral medicine that induces lethal copying errors during SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication. Molnupiravir reduced hospitalization in one pivotal trial by 50% and had variable effects on reducing viral RNA levels in three separate trials. We used mathematical models to simulate these trials and closely recapitulated their virologic outcomes. Model simulations suggest lower antiviral potency against pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants than against omicron. We estimate that in vitro assays underestimate in vivo potency 6-7 fold against omicron variants. Our model suggests that because polymerase chain reaction detects molnupiravir mutated variants, the true reduction in non-mutated viral RNA is underestimated by ~0.4 log10 in the two trials conducted while omicron variants dominated. Viral area under the curve estimates differ significantly between non-mutated and mutated viral RNA. Our results reinforce past work suggesting that in vitro assays are unreliable for estimating in vivo antiviral drug potency and suggest that virologic endpoints for respiratory virus clinical trials should be catered to the drug mechanism of action.

Molnupiravir临床试验模拟表明聚合酶链反应低估了对SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒效力。
Molnupiravir是一种抗病毒药物,在SARS-CoV-2 RNA复制过程中诱导致命的复制错误。在一项关键试验中,Molnupiravir将住院率降低了50%,在三项独立试验中,它对降低病毒RNA水平有不同的影响。我们使用数学模型来模拟这些试验,并严密地概括了它们的病毒学结果。模型模拟表明,对前组粒SARS-CoV-2变体的抗病毒效力低于对组粒的抗病毒效力。我们估计,体外检测低估了体内抗组粒变异的效力6-7倍。我们的模型表明,由于聚合酶链反应检测到molnupiravir突变变体,在进行的两项试验中,非突变病毒RNA的真正减少被低估了0.4 log10,而组粒变体占主导地位。曲线下的病毒面积估计在非突变和突变病毒RNA之间有显著差异。我们的研究结果加强了过去的研究,表明体外测定法在估计体内抗病毒药物效力方面是不可靠的,并建议呼吸道病毒临床试验的病毒学终点应满足药物作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Journal of Clinical Investigation 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
24.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
1034
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Investigation, established in 1924 by the ASCI, is a prestigious publication that focuses on breakthroughs in basic and clinical biomedical science, with the goal of advancing the field of medicine. With an impressive Impact Factor of 15.9 in 2022, it is recognized as one of the leading journals in the "Medicine, Research & Experimental" category of the Web of Science. The journal attracts a diverse readership from various medical disciplines and sectors. It publishes a wide range of research articles encompassing all biomedical specialties, including Autoimmunity, Gastroenterology, Immunology, Metabolism, Nephrology, Neuroscience, Oncology, Pulmonology, Vascular Biology, and many others. The Editorial Board consists of esteemed academic editors who possess extensive expertise in their respective fields. They are actively involved in research, ensuring the journal's high standards of publication and scientific rigor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信