Introducing the Professionalism Mini-evaluation Exercise in Undergraduate Medical Training in India: A Validity and Feasibility Study.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rajiv Mahajan, Shital Bhandary, Purnima Barua, Sushanta Kumar Mishra, Priyanka Gupta, Sarika Gupta, Chandrika Rao, Roosy Aulakh, Tejinder Singh
{"title":"Introducing the Professionalism Mini-evaluation Exercise in Undergraduate Medical Training in India: A Validity and Feasibility Study.","authors":"Rajiv Mahajan, Shital Bhandary, Purnima Barua, Sushanta Kumar Mishra, Priyanka Gupta, Sarika Gupta, Chandrika Rao, Roosy Aulakh, Tejinder Singh","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_190_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) has demonstrated valid evidence in assessing the construct, professionalism, in resident training. As the Indian medical regulatory body has introduced \"professional\" as one of the seven roles of Indian Medical Graduate and as cultural and social differences affect professionalism of students' cohort across geographical regions, this study was undertaken to establish P-MEX's validity, reliability, and feasibility in assessing the construct, professionalism, in undergraduate medical students (UMSs) in India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicentric study assessed the final phase-2 (5<sup>th</sup> year) UMSs for the construct of professionalism using a 24-item P-MEX questionnaire during various clinical encounters. Construct validity was established by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) through structural equation modeling. Cronbach's alpha values defined the reliability of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The item mean score for the 697 collected P-MEX questionnaires ranged from 2.57 to 3.24 out of 4. EFA conducted using principal component analysis with item-component loading of 0.5 and above with Varimax rotation gave a 5-factor, 21-item solution. However, the CFA suggested a 4-factor, 18-item solution which was then confirmed by a rerun of the CFA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CFA suggests that the 18-item, 4-factor questionnaire is a good fit solution for assessing the construct, professionalism, in UMSs in Indian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"171-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_190_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) has demonstrated valid evidence in assessing the construct, professionalism, in resident training. As the Indian medical regulatory body has introduced "professional" as one of the seven roles of Indian Medical Graduate and as cultural and social differences affect professionalism of students' cohort across geographical regions, this study was undertaken to establish P-MEX's validity, reliability, and feasibility in assessing the construct, professionalism, in undergraduate medical students (UMSs) in India.

Materials and methods: This multicentric study assessed the final phase-2 (5th year) UMSs for the construct of professionalism using a 24-item P-MEX questionnaire during various clinical encounters. Construct validity was established by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) through structural equation modeling. Cronbach's alpha values defined the reliability of the questionnaire.

Results: The item mean score for the 697 collected P-MEX questionnaires ranged from 2.57 to 3.24 out of 4. EFA conducted using principal component analysis with item-component loading of 0.5 and above with Varimax rotation gave a 5-factor, 21-item solution. However, the CFA suggested a 4-factor, 18-item solution which was then confirmed by a rerun of the CFA.

Conclusion: The CFA suggests that the 18-item, 4-factor questionnaire is a good fit solution for assessing the construct, professionalism, in UMSs in Indian context.

Abstract Image

在印度本科医学培训中引入专业精神小型评估练习:有效性和可行性研究。
背景:专业精神迷你评估练习(P-MEX)在评估住院医师培训的结构、专业精神方面已经证明了有效的证据。鉴于印度医疗监管机构将“专业”作为印度医学研究生的七个角色之一,以及文化和社会差异影响不同地理区域学生群体的专业精神,本研究旨在建立P-MEX评估印度本科医学学生专业精神建构的效度、信度和可行性。材料和方法:这项多中心研究在不同的临床接触中使用24项P-MEX问卷评估了最终的第二阶段(第5年)UMSs的专业建设。通过结构方程模型进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来确定结构效度。Cronbach’s alpha值定义了问卷的信度。结果:697份P-MEX问卷的平均得分为2.57 ~ 3.24分(满分4分)。采用主成分分析进行EFA,项目-成分载荷为0.5及以上,Varimax旋转得到5因素,21项解决方案。然而,CFA建议了一个4因素,18个项目的解决方案,然后由CFA重新运行确认。结论:CFA建议采用18项4因素问卷来评估印度背景下UMSs的结构、专业度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信