LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING CHOLANGIOPANCREATOSCOPY-GUIDED LASER DISSECTION AND ABLATION FOR REFRACTORY PANCREATIC AND BILIARY STRICTURES.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Thomas Enke, Nicole Rueb, Fernanda Pessorrusso, Samuel Han, Raj J Shah
{"title":"LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING CHOLANGIOPANCREATOSCOPY-GUIDED LASER DISSECTION AND ABLATION FOR REFRACTORY PANCREATIC AND BILIARY STRICTURES.","authors":"Thomas Enke, Nicole Rueb, Fernanda Pessorrusso, Samuel Han, Raj J Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>A subgroup of patients with benign biliary (BD) and pancreatic duct (PD) strictures fail to resolve with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided stenting. Novel endoscopic approaches are needed. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cholangiopancreatoscopy-guided laser dissection or ablation (CPL) for the treatment of refractory pancreaticobiliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective review of all CPL cases performed for refractory BD or PD strictures. Primary outcome was stricture resolution.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>technical success, adverse events, and stent-free survival assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients underwent CPL from 5/2016 - 8/2023 and had a median 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5) prior ERCPs to treat the stricture(s) of interest. Fifty-three CPL's were performed (median 1 per patient; IQR 1-2) for 49 strictures: 41 PD (83.7%; 17 body,15 head, 6 neck, and 3 tail) and 8 BD (16.3%; 5 common hepatic duct, 2 common bile duct, and 1 hilum). Complete and partial resolution occurred in 30 (61.2%) and 17 (34.7%) of strictures, respectively. Technical success was 100%. Stent-free trial was attempted in 25 (83.3%) patients after a median of 6 months (IQR 3-8) and median of 4 (IQR 2-4) ERCPs including index CPL and ERCP with stent removal. In 22 patients with follow-up data, reintervention with stenting occurred in 45.5% (n=10) with a median survival time of 32 months (95% confidence interval: 12-42). No severe adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPL has high technical success and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of benign refractory BD and PD strictures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: A subgroup of patients with benign biliary (BD) and pancreatic duct (PD) strictures fail to resolve with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided stenting. Novel endoscopic approaches are needed. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cholangiopancreatoscopy-guided laser dissection or ablation (CPL) for the treatment of refractory pancreaticobiliary strictures.

Methods: Single-center retrospective review of all CPL cases performed for refractory BD or PD strictures. Primary outcome was stricture resolution.

Secondary outcomes: technical success, adverse events, and stent-free survival assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Thirty patients underwent CPL from 5/2016 - 8/2023 and had a median 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5) prior ERCPs to treat the stricture(s) of interest. Fifty-three CPL's were performed (median 1 per patient; IQR 1-2) for 49 strictures: 41 PD (83.7%; 17 body,15 head, 6 neck, and 3 tail) and 8 BD (16.3%; 5 common hepatic duct, 2 common bile duct, and 1 hilum). Complete and partial resolution occurred in 30 (61.2%) and 17 (34.7%) of strictures, respectively. Technical success was 100%. Stent-free trial was attempted in 25 (83.3%) patients after a median of 6 months (IQR 3-8) and median of 4 (IQR 2-4) ERCPs including index CPL and ERCP with stent removal. In 22 patients with follow-up data, reintervention with stenting occurred in 45.5% (n=10) with a median survival time of 32 months (95% confidence interval: 12-42). No severe adverse events occurred.

Conclusions: CPL has high technical success and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of benign refractory BD and PD strictures.

胆管镜引导下激光切除及消融治疗难治性胰腺及胆道狭窄患者的长期随访。
背景和目的:一组良性胆道(BD)和胰管(PD)狭窄的患者不能通过内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)引导的支架置入来解决。需要新的内窥镜入路。本研究旨在评价胆管镜引导下激光剥离或消融(CPL)治疗难治性胰胆管狭窄的疗效和安全性。方法:对所有难治性BD或PD狭窄行CPL的病例进行单中心回顾性分析。主要结局是结构解决。次要结局:采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估技术成功、不良事件和无支架生存期。结果:30例患者于2016年5月至2023年8月期间接受了CPL,既往ercp治疗感兴趣的狭窄的中位数为3(四分位间距[IQR] 1-5)。49例狭窄行53例CPL(中位1例/例;IQR 1-2): PD 41例(83.7%;体17例,头15例,颈6例,尾3例),BD 8例(16.3%;肝总管5例,胆总管2例,门1例)。30例(61.2%)狭窄完全消退,17例(34.7%)狭窄部分消退。技术上的成功率是100%。25例(83.3%)患者在中位6个月(IQR 3-8)和中位4例(IQR 2-4) ERCP后进行无支架试验,包括指数CPL和ERCP并支架移除。在22例随访数据中,45.5% (n=10)的患者进行了支架再干预,中位生存时间为32个月(95%可信区间:12-42)。未发生严重不良事件。结论:CPL在治疗良性难治性BD和PD狭窄方面具有很高的技术成功率和可接受的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信