Leg-fidgeting versus standing breaks during prolonged sitting: Impacts on blood pressure and heart rate in young women.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Saja Alghamdi, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Ghareeb Omar Alshuwaier, Jamal M Alzahrani, Abdullah Bandar Alansare
{"title":"Leg-fidgeting versus standing breaks during prolonged sitting: Impacts on blood pressure and heart rate in young women.","authors":"Saja Alghamdi, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Ghareeb Omar Alshuwaier, Jamal M Alzahrani, Abdullah Bandar Alansare","doi":"10.1113/EP093057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this work was to examine whether leg-fidgeting breaks during prolonged sitting could be a practical alternative to standing breaks in preventing blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) impairments. Young women (n = 16; age = 21.9 ± 3.0 years; body mass index = 21.1 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) completed three 3-h prolonged sitting conditions in a random order, including: (1) uninterrupted prolonged sitting, (2) interrupted prolonged sitting every 20 min with standing for 5 min, and (3) interrupted prolonged sitting every 4 min with leg-fidgeting for 1 min. Oscillometric brachial BP and HR were measured at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 h of prolonged sitting. Generalized linear mixed models with random effects evaluated the effects of the three prolonged sitting conditions on BP and HR while controlling for baseline values. Effect sizes were estimated using Cohen's d. No significant differences were observed between the three prolonged sitting conditions for all BP variables (P > 0.05 for all). HR was significantly lower when prolonged sitting was interrupted with standing (β = -4.406 beats; d = 0.46; P = 0.009) or leg-fidgeting (β = -3.802 beats; d = 0.46; P = 0.023) compared to the uninterrupted prolonged sitting condition. These findings suggest that leg-fidgeting breaks during prolonged sitting may serve as a practical alternative to standing breaks in preventing some prolonged sitting-induced cardiovascular impairments, particularly HR, in young women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP093057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this work was to examine whether leg-fidgeting breaks during prolonged sitting could be a practical alternative to standing breaks in preventing blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) impairments. Young women (n = 16; age = 21.9 ± 3.0 years; body mass index = 21.1 ± 4.9 kg/m2) completed three 3-h prolonged sitting conditions in a random order, including: (1) uninterrupted prolonged sitting, (2) interrupted prolonged sitting every 20 min with standing for 5 min, and (3) interrupted prolonged sitting every 4 min with leg-fidgeting for 1 min. Oscillometric brachial BP and HR were measured at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 h of prolonged sitting. Generalized linear mixed models with random effects evaluated the effects of the three prolonged sitting conditions on BP and HR while controlling for baseline values. Effect sizes were estimated using Cohen's d. No significant differences were observed between the three prolonged sitting conditions for all BP variables (P > 0.05 for all). HR was significantly lower when prolonged sitting was interrupted with standing (β = -4.406 beats; d = 0.46; P = 0.009) or leg-fidgeting (β = -3.802 beats; d = 0.46; P = 0.023) compared to the uninterrupted prolonged sitting condition. These findings suggest that leg-fidgeting breaks during prolonged sitting may serve as a practical alternative to standing breaks in preventing some prolonged sitting-induced cardiovascular impairments, particularly HR, in young women.

长时间坐着时坐立不安与站立休息:对年轻女性血压和心率的影响。
这项工作的目的是研究在长时间坐着时,坐立不安的腿部休息是否可以作为一种实际的替代站立休息,以防止血压(BP)和心率(HR)损伤。年轻女性(n = 16,年龄= 21.9±3.0岁,体重指数= 21.1±4.9 kg/m2)随机完成3个3小时长坐条件,包括:(1)不间断长坐;(2)每隔20分钟中断长坐,站立5分钟;(3)每隔4分钟中断长坐,坐立不安1分钟。在基线和长时间静坐1、2和3小时后测量肱血压和心率。在控制基线值的情况下,随机效应的广义线性混合模型评估了三种长时间坐姿对血压和心率的影响。效应量使用Cohen’s d进行估计。在三种长时间静坐条件下,所有BP变量之间没有观察到显著差异(P < 0.05)。与不间断长时间坐着的情况相比,长时间坐着被站立打断(β = -4.406次;d = 0.46; P = 0.009)或坐立不安(β = -3.802次;d = 0.46; P = 0.023)时的心率显著降低。这些发现表明,对于年轻女性来说,长时间坐着时的腿部抖动休息可能是一种实用的替代站立休息的方法,可以预防一些长时间坐着引起的心血管损伤,尤其是HR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信