Cost-effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy and 5-Fluorouracil Cream versus Surgical Excision in Treatment of Bowen's Disease: a trial based economic evaluation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1159/000548431
Shima Ahmady, Charlotte A M van Riel, Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets, Klara Mosterd, Brigitte A B Essers
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy and 5-Fluorouracil Cream versus Surgical Excision in Treatment of Bowen's Disease: a trial based economic evaluation.","authors":"Shima Ahmady, Charlotte A M van Riel, Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets, Klara Mosterd, Brigitte A B Essers","doi":"10.1159/000548431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Given the increasing incidence of Bowen's disease, treatment leads to a substantial economic burden for healthcare services. There are several treatment options for Bowen's disease, of which surgical excision, 5-fluorouracil and methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) are the most commonly used. Recently, results from a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial showed that 5-fluorouracil was non-inferior to excision and was associated with a better cosmetic outcome. MAL-PDT was not shown to be non-inferior to excision. Although 5-fluorouracil and MAL-PDT were expected to be cheaper than excision, it remains to be determined whether the potential cost savings compensate for the loss of effectiveness. Objectives To determine which treatment is cost-effective from a health care perspective when comparing surgical excision, MAL-PDT, and 5% 5-fluorouracil cream for Bowen's disease. Methods Data were collected alongside a randomized controlled trial with 250 patients in the Netherlands. Valuation of treatment costs was based on documented resource use and Dutch cost prices. A cost-effectiveness was performed from a health care perspective. The primary outcome was the decremental cost-effectiveness ratio (DCER), expressed as the cost-savings per additional recurrence or residual Bowen's disease. Bootstrap analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to address uncertainty. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03909646. Results At 12 months after treatment, the costs for 5-fluorouracil cream were significantly lower (- €311(CI: -240 - -378)) and the costs for MAL-PDT were higher (€3 (CI: -74- 65)) compared to excision. 5-fluorouracil cream offers cost savings compared to excision, but is less effective although within the non-inferiority margin of 22%. Our results showed that 5-fluorouracil has the highest probability of being cost-effective at willingness to accept threshold values of €2500 and lower compared to MAL-PDT and surgical excision. Discussion 5-fluorouracil cream is a cost-effective treatment at a threshold value of €2500 and lower when compared to surgical excision and MAL-PDT. Therefore, from a cost-effectiveness point of view, 5-fluorouracil is considered the first-choice treatment option for Bowen's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Given the increasing incidence of Bowen's disease, treatment leads to a substantial economic burden for healthcare services. There are several treatment options for Bowen's disease, of which surgical excision, 5-fluorouracil and methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) are the most commonly used. Recently, results from a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial showed that 5-fluorouracil was non-inferior to excision and was associated with a better cosmetic outcome. MAL-PDT was not shown to be non-inferior to excision. Although 5-fluorouracil and MAL-PDT were expected to be cheaper than excision, it remains to be determined whether the potential cost savings compensate for the loss of effectiveness. Objectives To determine which treatment is cost-effective from a health care perspective when comparing surgical excision, MAL-PDT, and 5% 5-fluorouracil cream for Bowen's disease. Methods Data were collected alongside a randomized controlled trial with 250 patients in the Netherlands. Valuation of treatment costs was based on documented resource use and Dutch cost prices. A cost-effectiveness was performed from a health care perspective. The primary outcome was the decremental cost-effectiveness ratio (DCER), expressed as the cost-savings per additional recurrence or residual Bowen's disease. Bootstrap analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to address uncertainty. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03909646. Results At 12 months after treatment, the costs for 5-fluorouracil cream were significantly lower (- €311(CI: -240 - -378)) and the costs for MAL-PDT were higher (€3 (CI: -74- 65)) compared to excision. 5-fluorouracil cream offers cost savings compared to excision, but is less effective although within the non-inferiority margin of 22%. Our results showed that 5-fluorouracil has the highest probability of being cost-effective at willingness to accept threshold values of €2500 and lower compared to MAL-PDT and surgical excision. Discussion 5-fluorouracil cream is a cost-effective treatment at a threshold value of €2500 and lower when compared to surgical excision and MAL-PDT. Therefore, from a cost-effectiveness point of view, 5-fluorouracil is considered the first-choice treatment option for Bowen's disease.

光动力疗法和5-氟尿嘧啶乳膏与手术切除治疗鲍温病的成本-效果:一项基于试验的经济评估
鉴于鲍文氏病的发病率越来越高,治疗导致医疗保健服务的巨大经济负担。鲍文氏病有几种治疗方法,其中手术切除、5-氟尿嘧啶和甲氨基乙酰丙酸光动力疗法(MAL-PDT)是最常用的。最近,一项随机对照非劣效性试验的结果表明,5-氟尿嘧啶不逊于手术切除,并且与更好的美容效果相关。MAL-PDT并没有表现出优于切除的效果。虽然预计5-氟尿嘧啶和MAL-PDT比切除更便宜,但潜在的成本节约是否能弥补有效性的损失仍有待确定。目的比较手术切除、MAL-PDT和5% 5-氟尿嘧啶乳膏治疗鲍文氏病,从医疗保健角度确定哪种治疗方法具有成本效益。方法收集荷兰250例患者的随机对照试验数据。处理费用的估价是根据记录的资源使用和荷兰成本价格。从保健角度进行了成本效益评估。主要结局是减少成本-效果比(DCER),表示为每增加一次复发或残余鲍文病的成本节约。采用Bootstrap分析和灵敏度分析来解决不确定性。该试验已注册ClinicalTrials.gov,注册号为NCT03909646。结果在治疗后12个月,与切除相比,5-氟尿嘧啶乳膏的费用明显较低(- 311欧元(CI: -240 - -378)), MAL-PDT的费用较高(3欧元(CI: -74- 65))。与切除相比,5-氟尿嘧啶乳膏节省了成本,但效果较差,尽管在22%的非劣效性范围内。我们的研究结果表明,与MAL-PDT和手术切除相比,5-氟尿嘧啶在愿意接受2500欧元或更低的阈值时具有最高的成本效益。5-氟尿嘧啶乳膏是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法,阈值为2500欧元,与手术切除和MAL-PDT相比更低。因此,从成本效益的角度来看,5-氟尿嘧啶被认为是鲍文病的首选治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信