Risk of Distant Metastasis After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: Local Regrowth Versus Surgery After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Pathologic Near-Complete Response in Rectal Cancer.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Salih Karahan, Metincan Erkaya, Mustafa Oruc, Scott Steele, David Rosen, Joshua Sommavilla, David Liska, Emre Gorgun
{"title":"Risk of Distant Metastasis After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: Local Regrowth Versus Surgery After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Pathologic Near-Complete Response in Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Salih Karahan, Metincan Erkaya, Mustafa Oruc, Scott Steele, David Rosen, Joshua Sommavilla, David Liska, Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response managed nonoperatively, local regrowth occurs in up to 35%. Although prior studies suggest a higher metastatic risk after regrowth, most data are derived from conventional chemoradiotherapy cohorts. The risk in a total neoadjuvant therapy setting remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether local regrowth after clinical complete response in patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy increases the risk of distant metastasis, and to evaluate if the risk could be reduced by upfront surgery performed after total neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy between 2018 and 2024 who achieved a clinical complete response, were managed nonoperatively, developed local regrowth, and subsequently underwent salvage total mesorectal excision, compared with those who underwent upfront total mesorectal excision after total neoadjuvant therapy, with final pathology demonstrating a near-complete response.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Total neoadjuvant therapy followed by either watch & wait and salvage total mesorectal excision or upfront total mesorectal excision.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was distant metastasis. Secondary outcomes included distant metastasis-free survival and independent predictors of distant spread.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients were included (median age: 58 years [IQR, 51-67]; 58% male): 32 with local regrowth managed by salvage total mesorectal excision and 42 with upfront total mesorectal excision. The distant metastasis-free survival was comparable between groups, and local regrowth was not independently associated with distant metastasis (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.25-4.00). ypT3-4 stage was independently associated with increased risk of distant metastasis (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-25.3), while complete mesorectal excision was protective (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.59).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective design, small sample size, and limited follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy who developed local regrowth and underwent salvage total mesorectal excision achieved distant metastasis rates comparable to those who underwent upfront surgery after total neoadjuvant therapy and demonstrated a pathologic near-complete response. High-quality salvage surgery and close surveillance are essential for optimizing oncologic outcomes. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response managed nonoperatively, local regrowth occurs in up to 35%. Although prior studies suggest a higher metastatic risk after regrowth, most data are derived from conventional chemoradiotherapy cohorts. The risk in a total neoadjuvant therapy setting remains unclear.

Objective: To assess whether local regrowth after clinical complete response in patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy increases the risk of distant metastasis, and to evaluate if the risk could be reduced by upfront surgery performed after total neoadjuvant therapy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single tertiary care center.

Patients: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy between 2018 and 2024 who achieved a clinical complete response, were managed nonoperatively, developed local regrowth, and subsequently underwent salvage total mesorectal excision, compared with those who underwent upfront total mesorectal excision after total neoadjuvant therapy, with final pathology demonstrating a near-complete response.

Intervention: Total neoadjuvant therapy followed by either watch & wait and salvage total mesorectal excision or upfront total mesorectal excision.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was distant metastasis. Secondary outcomes included distant metastasis-free survival and independent predictors of distant spread.

Results: Seventy-four patients were included (median age: 58 years [IQR, 51-67]; 58% male): 32 with local regrowth managed by salvage total mesorectal excision and 42 with upfront total mesorectal excision. The distant metastasis-free survival was comparable between groups, and local regrowth was not independently associated with distant metastasis (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.25-4.00). ypT3-4 stage was independently associated with increased risk of distant metastasis (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-25.3), while complete mesorectal excision was protective (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.59).

Limitations: Retrospective design, small sample size, and limited follow-up.

Conclusion: Patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy who developed local regrowth and underwent salvage total mesorectal excision achieved distant metastasis rates comparable to those who underwent upfront surgery after total neoadjuvant therapy and demonstrated a pathologic near-complete response. High-quality salvage surgery and close surveillance are essential for optimizing oncologic outcomes. See Video Abstract.

全新辅助治疗后远处转移的风险:直肠癌病理接近完全缓解的全新辅助治疗后局部再生与手术。
背景:在非手术治疗的临床完全缓解的直肠癌患者中,局部再生发生率高达35%。虽然先前的研究表明再生后转移风险更高,但大多数数据来自常规放化疗队列。完全新辅助治疗的风险仍不清楚。目的:评估全新辅助治疗患者临床完全缓解后局部再生是否会增加远处转移的风险,并评估全新辅助治疗后进行前期手术是否可以降低远处转移的风险。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:单一三级保健中心。患者:2018年至2024年间接受全面新辅助治疗的局部晚期直肠癌患者,达到临床完全缓解,非手术治疗,局部再生,随后行补救性全肠系膜切除术,与在全面新辅助治疗后接受前期全肠系膜切除术的患者相比,最终病理显示接近完全缓解。干预措施:全新辅助治疗,然后观察等待和挽救性全肠系膜切除术或预先全肠系膜切除术。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为远处转移。次要结局包括远处无转移生存和远处扩散的独立预测指标。结果:纳入74例患者(中位年龄:58岁[IQR, 51-67]; 58%为男性):32例采用补救性全肠系膜切除术治疗局部再生,42例采用预先全肠系膜切除术。两组之间的无远处转移生存率具有可比性,局部再生与远处转移不独立相关(OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.25-4.00)。ypT3-4期与远处转移风险增加独立相关(OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-25.3),而完全切除直肠系膜具有保护作用(OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.59)。局限性:回顾性设计,样本量小,随访时间有限。结论:接受全新辅助治疗的局部再生并行补救性全肠系膜切除术的患者远端转移率与接受全新辅助治疗后接受术前手术的患者相当,并表现出病理上的接近完全缓解。高质量的挽救性手术和密切监测是优化肿瘤预后的必要条件。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信