Acute Loss of Tactile Input Leads to General Compensatory Changes in Eye-Hand Coordination during Object Manipulation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-09-29 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0487-23.2025
Kevin Ung, John F Magnotti, Brandon Kim, Jeffrey M Yau, Per F Nordmark
{"title":"Acute Loss of Tactile Input Leads to General Compensatory Changes in Eye-Hand Coordination during Object Manipulation.","authors":"Kevin Ung, John F Magnotti, Brandon Kim, Jeffrey M Yau, Per F Nordmark","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0487-23.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current models of motor control emphasize the critical role of sensory feedback, as demonstrated by movement coordination deficits following sensory impairment. When both vision and touch are available for object-oriented manual behaviors, they serve distinct roles; vision guides the execution of planned movements, while touch provides more direct feedback on hand-object interactions. The impact of losing somatosensory feedback on eye-hand coordination during dexterous object manipulation tasks has not been thoroughly studied. Conceivably, vision is recruited to compensate for the feedback lost when touch is abolished based on the dexterity demands of the behavior. To investigate this, we tested healthy participants of either sex on a manual dexterity task requiring the movement of small metal pegs, both before and after the administration of digital anesthesia, which selectively abolished cutaneous sensations in the fingertips while preserving motor function. We recorded participants' gaze and hand positions. Despite loss of cutaneous feedback, participants successfully completed the pegboard task. However, they exhibited significantly longer trial times and altered force profiles. Notably, acute somatosensory loss triggered a rapid shift in visual behavior, characterized by a tighter coupling between gaze and hand positions across all task actions, even those not directly involving object manipulation. These changes, which occurred with anesthesia of the dominant and nondominant hands, were not evident with sham (saline) injections. Our findings underscore the contributions of sensory feedback to force control in service of dexterous object manipulation and reveal the nonselective nature of compensatory gaze-hand coordination processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0487-23.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current models of motor control emphasize the critical role of sensory feedback, as demonstrated by movement coordination deficits following sensory impairment. When both vision and touch are available for object-oriented manual behaviors, they serve distinct roles; vision guides the execution of planned movements, while touch provides more direct feedback on hand-object interactions. The impact of losing somatosensory feedback on eye-hand coordination during dexterous object manipulation tasks has not been thoroughly studied. Conceivably, vision is recruited to compensate for the feedback lost when touch is abolished based on the dexterity demands of the behavior. To investigate this, we tested healthy participants of either sex on a manual dexterity task requiring the movement of small metal pegs, both before and after the administration of digital anesthesia, which selectively abolished cutaneous sensations in the fingertips while preserving motor function. We recorded participants' gaze and hand positions. Despite loss of cutaneous feedback, participants successfully completed the pegboard task. However, they exhibited significantly longer trial times and altered force profiles. Notably, acute somatosensory loss triggered a rapid shift in visual behavior, characterized by a tighter coupling between gaze and hand positions across all task actions, even those not directly involving object manipulation. These changes, which occurred with anesthesia of the dominant and nondominant hands, were not evident with sham (saline) injections. Our findings underscore the contributions of sensory feedback to force control in service of dexterous object manipulation and reveal the nonselective nature of compensatory gaze-hand coordination processes.

触觉输入的急性丧失导致在物体操作过程中眼手协调的一般代偿性变化。
当前的运动控制模型强调感觉反馈的关键作用,正如运动协调缺陷后的感觉损伤所证明的那样。当视觉和触觉都可用于面向对象的手动行为时,它们扮演不同的角色;视觉指导计划动作的执行,而触觉在手与物的交互中提供更直接的反馈。失去体感反馈对灵巧物体操作任务中眼手协调的影响尚未得到充分的研究。可以想象,视觉被用来补偿触觉被取消时失去的反馈,这是基于行为对灵巧性的要求。为了研究这一点,我们对健康的男女参与者进行了一项需要移动小金属钉的手工灵巧任务的测试,在给手指麻醉之前和之后,有选择地消除了指尖的皮肤感觉,同时保留了运动功能。我们记录了参与者的目光和手的位置。尽管失去了皮肤反馈,但参与者成功地完成了钉板任务。然而,他们表现出更长的试验时间和改变的力分布。值得注意的是,急性体感丧失引发了视觉行为的快速转变,其特征是在所有任务动作中,即使是那些不直接涉及物体操作的动作,凝视和手的位置之间的耦合也更紧密。这些变化,在麻醉优势手和非优势手时发生,在假(生理盐水)注射时不明显。我们的研究结果强调了感官反馈对灵巧物体操纵力控制的贡献,并揭示了代偿性注视-手协调过程的非选择性。触觉和视觉通常支持灵巧手行为的不同但协调的方面。在这里,我们评估了使用数字麻醉急性去除触觉反馈如何影响手灵巧任务中的表现和注视-手协调。在手指失去知觉和视力完好的情况下,参与者继续成功地完成任务,尽管实验时间明显更长,力谱也发生了变化。我们还观察到,在所有任务操作中,即使是那些不涉及物体操作的任务,目光和手的位置也会更接近。我们的结果揭示了急性体感觉丧失的后果和代偿眼手协调过程的一般性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信