Brain network controllability in genetic risk, childhood abuse, and adult anxiety.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tian Tian, Min Chen, Jicheng Fang, Wenzhen Zhu
{"title":"Brain network controllability in genetic risk, childhood abuse, and adult anxiety.","authors":"Tian Tian, Min Chen, Jicheng Fang, Wenzhen Zhu","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2551953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Network control theory can quantify controllability to evaluate how altered transitions between brain states contribute to cognitive, emotional, and behavioural challenges. Childhood abuse, influenced by genetics, is associated with disrupted network function, though the exact control processes are not yet understood.<b>Objective:</b> This study aims to investigate the association between brain network controllability and childhood abuse experiences, and to elucidate its potential mediating role in the relationship among polygenic risk scores (PRS) for childhood abuse, childhood abuse experiences, and adult health outcomes.<b>Methods:</b> This study measured the controllability of functional brain networks, including both average and modal controllability, in a cohort of 214 young adults with varied histories of childhood abuse. Participants also completed psychological assessments, whole-exome sequencing, and the calculation of PRS for childhood abuse. This study investigate the association between brain network controllability and childhood abuse. Furthermore, a mediation model was performed to explore the potential mediating role of brain network controllability in the relationship between genetic risk, childhood abuse experiences, and adult health outcomes.<b>Results:</b> The controllability of the dorsal attention and sensorimotor networks, as well as the controllability of key ROIs within the sensorimotor, default mode, dorsal attention, visual, and control networks, demonstrated significant correlations with abuse scores. Despite no direct correlation between PRS and self-reported childhood abuse, indirect effects through the controllability of visual and control network regions were identified. The controllability of the left postcentral gyrus in the dorsal attention network mediated the relationship between childhood abuse and adult anxiety.<b>Conclusions:</b> This study reveals that brain network controllability is a pivotal factor, not only bridging PRS and childhood abuse but also serving as a potential mediator between childhood trauma and adult anxiety, offering a new perspective on the neurobiology of childhood abuse-related psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2551953"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2551953","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Network control theory can quantify controllability to evaluate how altered transitions between brain states contribute to cognitive, emotional, and behavioural challenges. Childhood abuse, influenced by genetics, is associated with disrupted network function, though the exact control processes are not yet understood.Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between brain network controllability and childhood abuse experiences, and to elucidate its potential mediating role in the relationship among polygenic risk scores (PRS) for childhood abuse, childhood abuse experiences, and adult health outcomes.Methods: This study measured the controllability of functional brain networks, including both average and modal controllability, in a cohort of 214 young adults with varied histories of childhood abuse. Participants also completed psychological assessments, whole-exome sequencing, and the calculation of PRS for childhood abuse. This study investigate the association between brain network controllability and childhood abuse. Furthermore, a mediation model was performed to explore the potential mediating role of brain network controllability in the relationship between genetic risk, childhood abuse experiences, and adult health outcomes.Results: The controllability of the dorsal attention and sensorimotor networks, as well as the controllability of key ROIs within the sensorimotor, default mode, dorsal attention, visual, and control networks, demonstrated significant correlations with abuse scores. Despite no direct correlation between PRS and self-reported childhood abuse, indirect effects through the controllability of visual and control network regions were identified. The controllability of the left postcentral gyrus in the dorsal attention network mediated the relationship between childhood abuse and adult anxiety.Conclusions: This study reveals that brain network controllability is a pivotal factor, not only bridging PRS and childhood abuse but also serving as a potential mediator between childhood trauma and adult anxiety, offering a new perspective on the neurobiology of childhood abuse-related psychopathology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

遗传风险、儿童虐待和成人焦虑中的脑网络可控性。
背景:网络控制理论可以量化可控性,以评估大脑状态之间的转变如何导致认知、情绪和行为挑战。受基因影响的童年虐待与网络功能紊乱有关,尽管确切的控制过程尚不清楚。目的:探讨脑网络可控性与儿童虐待经历的关系,并探讨其在儿童虐待多基因风险评分(PRS)、儿童虐待经历和成人健康结局之间的中介作用。方法:本研究测量了214名有不同童年虐待史的年轻人的脑功能网络的可控性,包括平均可控性和模态可控性。参与者还完成了心理评估、全外显子组测序和儿童期虐待的PRS计算。本研究探讨脑网络可控性与儿童虐待的关系。此外,我们还建立了一个中介模型来探讨脑网络可控性在遗传风险、童年虐待经历和成人健康结果之间的关系中的潜在中介作用。结果:背侧注意网络和感觉运动网络的可控性,以及感觉运动网络、默认模式网络、背侧注意网络、视觉网络和控制网络中关键roi的可控性与虐待得分呈显著相关。尽管PRS与自我报告的童年虐待之间没有直接关联,但通过视觉和控制网络区域的可控性发现了间接影响。儿童虐待与成人焦虑之间的关系,在背侧注意网络左侧中央后回的可控制性中起中介作用。结论:本研究揭示了脑网络可控性是连接PRS与儿童虐待的关键因素,也是儿童创伤与成人焦虑之间的潜在中介,为儿童虐待相关精神病理的神经生物学研究提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信