Midsagittal Midbrain Area and Midbrain-to-Pons-Ratio Cannot Distinguish Overlap Syndromes Between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.
Daniel Cantré, Jochem König, Caroline Makowsky, Martin Dyrba, Johannes Prudlo
{"title":"Midsagittal Midbrain Area and Midbrain-to-Pons-Ratio Cannot Distinguish Overlap Syndromes Between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.","authors":"Daniel Cantré, Jochem König, Caroline Makowsky, Martin Dyrba, Johannes Prudlo","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01564-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>When amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a TDP-43 proteinopathy, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a tauopathy, are associated with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD or PSP-FTD), clinical differentiation can be challenging. There are no established imaging biomarkers to differentiate ALS-FTD from PSP-FTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the midsagittal midbrain area (MBA) and the midbrain-to-pons-(MB/P)-ratios in T1 MPRAGE MRI of 36 PSP cases (n = 14 PSP-FTD), 77 ALS cases (n = 10 ALS-FTD), and 72 healthy controls (HC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ALS, both parameters were indistinguishable from HC. Patients with ALS-FTD had low MBA-values and MB/P-ratios not significantly different from cases of PSP. While ROC-analyses provided an excellent diagnostic accuracy of both parameters for differentiating PSP from HC (AUC<sub>MBA</sub> = 0.974) as well as PSP from ALS (AUC<sub>MBA</sub> = 0.982), midbrain morphometry provided poor diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing ALS-FTD from PSP-FTD (AUC<sub>MBA</sub> = 0,614).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MBA and the MB/P-ratio are morphometric parameters that have proven reliable in atypical Parkinsonian syndromes. Both can distinguish between PSP and ALS in their typical clinical forms. However, they cannot differentiate between PSP-FTD and ALS-FTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01564-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: When amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a TDP-43 proteinopathy, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a tauopathy, are associated with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD or PSP-FTD), clinical differentiation can be challenging. There are no established imaging biomarkers to differentiate ALS-FTD from PSP-FTD.
Methods: We evaluated the midsagittal midbrain area (MBA) and the midbrain-to-pons-(MB/P)-ratios in T1 MPRAGE MRI of 36 PSP cases (n = 14 PSP-FTD), 77 ALS cases (n = 10 ALS-FTD), and 72 healthy controls (HC).
Results: In ALS, both parameters were indistinguishable from HC. Patients with ALS-FTD had low MBA-values and MB/P-ratios not significantly different from cases of PSP. While ROC-analyses provided an excellent diagnostic accuracy of both parameters for differentiating PSP from HC (AUCMBA = 0.974) as well as PSP from ALS (AUCMBA = 0.982), midbrain morphometry provided poor diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing ALS-FTD from PSP-FTD (AUCMBA = 0,614).
Conclusion: The MBA and the MB/P-ratio are morphometric parameters that have proven reliable in atypical Parkinsonian syndromes. Both can distinguish between PSP and ALS in their typical clinical forms. However, they cannot differentiate between PSP-FTD and ALS-FTD.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects.
The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.