'A community in crisis': staff qualitative experiences of NHS and third sector mental healthcare in England.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Laura Sambrook, Jason C McIntyre, Rajan Nathan, Jackie Tait, Peter Ashley-Mudie, Matthew Humphreys, Peter Wilson, Pooja Saini
{"title":"'A community in crisis': staff qualitative experiences of NHS and third sector mental healthcare in England.","authors":"Laura Sambrook, Jason C McIntyre, Rajan Nathan, Jackie Tait, Peter Ashley-Mudie, Matthew Humphreys, Peter Wilson, Pooja Saini","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More people than ever are receiving support for mental health issues, and instances of suicide continue to grow. Although mental health funding has increased, UK government figures evidence that the National Health Service (NHS) does not have the resources required to respond to such growth in demand. The experiences of staff working in mental health services can offer insight into the efficacy of current provision and assist in service evaluation; however, research examining this issue outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the context of community mental health, is lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore the perspectives of staff working in a variety of mental health services in North-West England, to elucidate the current standard of care provided and highlight areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One-to-one interviews were conducted with 26 staff members as part of a qualitative grounded theory analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings portrayed a community in crisis, consisting of the following themes: stabilisation not recovery, inefficient pathways and barriers to collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NHS services are struggling to meet the mental health needs of the population, resulting in lengthy waiting times for therapy, a lack of intervention-focused care and an over-reliance on the third sector. While crisis cafés are provided at low cost and result in satisfaction, policy-makers must ensure that these receive adequate funding and do not become overburdened. Staff reported that collaboration between clinical and non-clinical services would improve care pathways and reduce strain on the NHS, but judgemental attitudes and inflexible service development must be challenged to achieve this.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More people than ever are receiving support for mental health issues, and instances of suicide continue to grow. Although mental health funding has increased, UK government figures evidence that the National Health Service (NHS) does not have the resources required to respond to such growth in demand. The experiences of staff working in mental health services can offer insight into the efficacy of current provision and assist in service evaluation; however, research examining this issue outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the context of community mental health, is lacking.

Aims: We aimed to explore the perspectives of staff working in a variety of mental health services in North-West England, to elucidate the current standard of care provided and highlight areas for improvement.

Method: One-to-one interviews were conducted with 26 staff members as part of a qualitative grounded theory analysis.

Results: Findings portrayed a community in crisis, consisting of the following themes: stabilisation not recovery, inefficient pathways and barriers to collaboration.

Conclusions: NHS services are struggling to meet the mental health needs of the population, resulting in lengthy waiting times for therapy, a lack of intervention-focused care and an over-reliance on the third sector. While crisis cafés are provided at low cost and result in satisfaction, policy-makers must ensure that these receive adequate funding and do not become overburdened. Staff reported that collaboration between clinical and non-clinical services would improve care pathways and reduce strain on the NHS, but judgemental attitudes and inflexible service development must be challenged to achieve this.

“危机中的社区”:英国国民保健制度和第三部门精神保健的工作人员定性经验。
背景:接受心理健康问题支持的人比以往任何时候都多,自杀事件继续增加。尽管心理健康资金有所增加,但英国政府的数据表明,国民健康服务体系(NHS)没有足够的资源来应对这种需求的增长。精神卫生服务工作人员的经验可以深入了解当前服务的有效性,并有助于服务评估;然而,在COVID-19大流行之外以及在社区精神卫生背景下研究这一问题的研究缺乏。目的:我们旨在探索在英格兰西北部各种心理健康服务工作人员的观点,以阐明目前提供的护理标准并突出需要改进的领域。方法:对26名工作人员进行一对一访谈,作为定性扎根理论分析的一部分。结果:调查结果描绘了一个处于危机中的社区,包括以下主题:稳定而不是恢复,低效的途径和合作障碍。结论:NHS服务正在努力满足人口的心理健康需求,导致长时间等待治疗,缺乏以干预为重点的护理和过度依赖第三部门。虽然危机培训以低成本提供,结果令人满意,但决策者必须确保这些培训获得足够的资金,而不会负担过重。工作人员报告说,临床和非临床服务之间的合作将改善护理途径,减少NHS的压力,但要实现这一目标,必须挑战评判态度和僵化的服务发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信