Device failures and patient-related adverse events with small bowel capsule endoscopy: a 20-year MAUDE database analysis.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0988
Eric S Tatro, Sherif E Elhanafi, Douglas G Adler, Andrew C Stuart, Marc J Zuckerman
{"title":"Device failures and patient-related adverse events with small bowel capsule endoscopy: a 20-year MAUDE database analysis.","authors":"Eric S Tatro, Sherif E Elhanafi, Douglas G Adler, Andrew C Stuart, Marc J Zuckerman","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a critical tool in the evaluation of small bowel bleeding, detection of small bowel neoplasms and diagnosing Crohn's disease. The object of this study was to examine device failures (DF) and patient-related adverse events (PRAE) in SBCE, including those involving the patency capsule system, using user-generated reports from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed post marketing surveillance data for SBCE data for all of the SBCE systems from the FDA's MAUDE database from January 2000 until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 352 reports were obtained during the study period, pertaining to the following SBCE systems, in descending order of frequency: Pillcam SB<sup>®</sup> system, Pillcam<sup>®</sup> Patency Capsule, Endocapsule<sup>®</sup>, CapsoCam<sup>®</sup> and MiroCam<sup>®</sup>. The vast majority pertained to the Pillcam<sup>®</sup> and Pillcam<sup>®</sup> Patency system: a total of 307 medical device reports with 398 DFs and 569 PRAEs. The most reported DFs were entrapment of the device (n=212, 53.2%), failure to transmit record (n=38, 9.5%), and failure to record (n=35, 8.7%). The most commonly reported PRAEs were a foreign body retained in the patient (n=140, 24.6%), unintentional exposure to radiation (n=104, 18.2%), and unintended exposure to anesthesia (n=58, 10.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from the MAUDE database regarding SBCE devices provide valuable information on DFs and PRAEs. This knowledge can help operators optimize patient selection and reduce patient risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 5","pages":"497-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a critical tool in the evaluation of small bowel bleeding, detection of small bowel neoplasms and diagnosing Crohn's disease. The object of this study was to examine device failures (DF) and patient-related adverse events (PRAE) in SBCE, including those involving the patency capsule system, using user-generated reports from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Method: We analyzed post marketing surveillance data for SBCE data for all of the SBCE systems from the FDA's MAUDE database from January 2000 until December 2023.

Results: A total of 352 reports were obtained during the study period, pertaining to the following SBCE systems, in descending order of frequency: Pillcam SB® system, Pillcam® Patency Capsule, Endocapsule®, CapsoCam® and MiroCam®. The vast majority pertained to the Pillcam® and Pillcam® Patency system: a total of 307 medical device reports with 398 DFs and 569 PRAEs. The most reported DFs were entrapment of the device (n=212, 53.2%), failure to transmit record (n=38, 9.5%), and failure to record (n=35, 8.7%). The most commonly reported PRAEs were a foreign body retained in the patient (n=140, 24.6%), unintentional exposure to radiation (n=104, 18.2%), and unintended exposure to anesthesia (n=58, 10.2%).

Conclusions: Findings from the MAUDE database regarding SBCE devices provide valuable information on DFs and PRAEs. This knowledge can help operators optimize patient selection and reduce patient risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

器械故障和小肠胶囊内窥镜患者相关不良事件:20年MAUDE数据库分析
背景:小肠胶囊内镜(SBCE)是评估小肠出血、检测小肠肿瘤和诊断克罗恩病的重要工具。本研究的目的是使用来自美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库的用户生成报告,检查SBCE中的设备故障(DF)和患者相关不良事件(PRAE),包括那些涉及通畅胶囊系统的事件。方法:我们分析了2000年1月至2023年12月FDA MAUDE数据库中所有SBCE系统的SBCE数据的上市后监测数据。结果:在研究期间共获得352份报告,涉及以下SBCE系统,按频率由高到低依次为:Pillcam SB®系统、Pillcam®Patency Capsule、Endocapsule®、CapsoCam®和MiroCam®。绝大多数与Pillcam®和Pillcam®专利系统有关:共有307份医疗器械报告,其中398份df和569份PRAEs。报告最多的DFs是设备卡套(n=212, 53.2%)、传输记录失败(n=38, 9.5%)和记录失败(n=35, 8.7%)。最常见的PRAEs报告是患者体内残留异物(n=140, 24.6%),意外暴露于辐射(n=104, 18.2%)和意外暴露于麻醉(n=58, 10.2%)。结论:来自MAUDE数据库关于SBCE器械的发现提供了关于DFs和PRAEs的有价值的信息。这些知识可以帮助操作员优化患者选择并降低患者风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信