Autism ableism seen through research abstract contents: A mixed-methods analysis of language in NIH-funded genetic and genomic autism research.

Abstract

In recent years, genetic and genomic autism research has come under increasing scrutiny, moving to the center of debates about ableism, neurodiversity, autism acceptance, and the future of research and care. At the same time, both autism research and genetics and genomics research have, as fields, begun to reckon with the significance of the language researchers use in the course of their work and the harmful ideas that may thereby be reinforced. Although the language of research cannot be assumed to straightforwardly correspond to individual researchers' beliefs, the presence of widespread ableist language may indicate structural and institutionalized ableism, including ableist assumptions at the foundations of research. We conducted a mixed-methods analysis of 166 genetic and genomic autism research projects funded by the US National Institutes of Health, in order to understand the prevalence of potentially ableist discourse, language, and stigmatizing language about autistic people. We found that such discourse and language was ubiquitous across our sample, including a discourse of prevention. This study lends empirical evidence to current debates about language in autism research. Evaluating language can prompt researchers and institutions to reflect on how they conceptualize, design, discuss, and pursue their work.Lay abstractGenetic research about autism is controversial. Researchers are starting to think more carefully about the words they use to talk about autism and the way they do their research. Past research has found that researchers sometimes write about autism in ableist ways. This means that they write about autistic people as though they are less important than nonautistic people. We looked at the way genetics researchers have written about autism in the paperwork for their research. We found that they often write about autistic people in an ableist way. We think that researchers should think carefully about the way they write about autistic people, and how they plan and do their research.