Raffaele Manta, Angelo Zullo, Vincenzo De Francesco, Marco Spadaccini, Cesare Hassan, Luigi Gatta
{"title":"Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy for malignant and benign gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Raffaele Manta, Angelo Zullo, Vincenzo De Francesco, Marco Spadaccini, Cesare Hassan, Luigi Gatta","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent has been proposed as a treatment for patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compute the technical success, clinical success and complication rates of EUS-GE in treating GOO due to either neoplastic or benign diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception until January 23, 2025, according to the PRISMA and MOOSE statement guidelines. The primary objective was to assess both technical and clinical success. A secondary outcome was to rate the adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 39 studies involving 2845 patients were analyzed. The pooled technical success rate was 95.1%, and the procedure was successful in 95.3% and 95.1% of patients with malignant or benign diseases, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 93.5% of all patients where the procedure had technical success, and in 93.1% and 94.4% of those treated for malignant and benign conditions, respectively. The overall rate of adverse events was 18.5%, including perforation (4.4%), bleeding (2.7%), stent migration (1.4%), stent closure (3.3%), infection (4.4%), and fistula (2.3%). The procedure-related mortality was 1.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-GE appears to be a viable approach for the treatment of GOO patients, for both malignant and benign diseases, with favorable outcomes and an acceptable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 5","pages":"554-563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent has been proposed as a treatment for patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compute the technical success, clinical success and complication rates of EUS-GE in treating GOO due to either neoplastic or benign diseases.
Methods: The literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception until January 23, 2025, according to the PRISMA and MOOSE statement guidelines. The primary objective was to assess both technical and clinical success. A secondary outcome was to rate the adverse events.
Results: Data from 39 studies involving 2845 patients were analyzed. The pooled technical success rate was 95.1%, and the procedure was successful in 95.3% and 95.1% of patients with malignant or benign diseases, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 93.5% of all patients where the procedure had technical success, and in 93.1% and 94.4% of those treated for malignant and benign conditions, respectively. The overall rate of adverse events was 18.5%, including perforation (4.4%), bleeding (2.7%), stent migration (1.4%), stent closure (3.3%), infection (4.4%), and fistula (2.3%). The procedure-related mortality was 1.4%.
Conclusion: EUS-GE appears to be a viable approach for the treatment of GOO patients, for both malignant and benign diseases, with favorable outcomes and an acceptable safety profile.
背景:超声内镜引导下的胃造口术(EUS-GE)联合腔内金属支架已被提出作为胃出口梗阻(GOO)患者的一种治疗方法。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以计算EUS-GE治疗肿瘤或良性疾病引起的粘粘症的技术成功率、临床成功率和并发症发生率。方法:根据PRISMA和MOOSE声明指南,在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central Register of Controlled Trials)中进行文献检索,检索时间从成立到2025年1月23日。主要目的是评估技术和临床成功。次要结果是评价不良事件。结果:分析了39项研究的数据,涉及2845例患者。合并技术成功率为95.1%,恶性和良性疾病患者的手术成功率分别为95.3%和95.1%。在手术取得技术成功的所有患者中,93.5%的患者取得了临床成功,恶性和良性疾病的患者分别取得了93.1%和94.4%的临床成功。总体不良事件发生率为18.5%,包括穿孔(4.4%)、出血(2.7%)、支架移位(1.4%)、支架闭合(3.3%)、感染(4.4%)和瘘(2.3%)。手术相关死亡率为1.4%。结论:EUS-GE似乎是治疗GOO患者的一种可行方法,无论是恶性还是良性疾病,都具有良好的结果和可接受的安全性。