Prediction control of CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants based on ERIME-optimized CNN-LSTM-multi-head-attention

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Minan Tang, Chuntao Rao, Tong Yang, Zhongcheng Bai, Yude Jiang, Yaqi Zhang, Wenxin Sheng, Zhanglong Tao, Changyou Wang, Mingyu Wang
{"title":"Prediction control of CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants based on ERIME-optimized CNN-LSTM-multi-head-attention","authors":"Minan Tang,&nbsp;Chuntao Rao,&nbsp;Tong Yang,&nbsp;Zhongcheng Bai,&nbsp;Yude Jiang,&nbsp;Yaqi Zhang,&nbsp;Wenxin Sheng,&nbsp;Zhanglong Tao,&nbsp;Changyou Wang,&nbsp;Mingyu Wang","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) systems is challenging due to complex operating conditions and multivariate interactions. This study proposes an enhanced RIME algorithm (ERIME) optimization-based convolutional neural network (CNN)-long short-term memory (LSTM)-multi-head-attention (ECLMA) model to improve prediction accuracy. The local outlier factor (LOF) algorithm was used to remove noise from the data, while mutual information (MI) determined time lags, and the smoothed clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) method optimized feature selection. The CNN-LSTM-multi-head-attention model extracts meaningful features from time series data, and parameters are optimized using the ERIME algorithm. Using a simulated dataset from a 600 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant, the results showed that after LOF outlier removal, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) improved by 10%–13%. Post-MI delay reconstruction reduced RMSE to 0.00999 and MAE to 11.6937, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> rising to 0.9929. After variable selection, RMSE and MAE further reduced to 0.00907 and 9.9697, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> increasing to 0.9983. After ERIME optimization, the ECLMA model outperformed traditional models, reducing RMSE and MAE by up to 91.55% and 84.94%, respectively, compared to CNN, and by 85.91% and 69.47%, respectively, compared to LSTM. These results confirm the model's superior accuracy and stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"103 10","pages":"4904-4924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting CO2 concentration in post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) systems is challenging due to complex operating conditions and multivariate interactions. This study proposes an enhanced RIME algorithm (ERIME) optimization-based convolutional neural network (CNN)-long short-term memory (LSTM)-multi-head-attention (ECLMA) model to improve prediction accuracy. The local outlier factor (LOF) algorithm was used to remove noise from the data, while mutual information (MI) determined time lags, and the smoothed clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) method optimized feature selection. The CNN-LSTM-multi-head-attention model extracts meaningful features from time series data, and parameters are optimized using the ERIME algorithm. Using a simulated dataset from a 600 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant, the results showed that after LOF outlier removal, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) improved by 10%–13%. Post-MI delay reconstruction reduced RMSE to 0.00999 and MAE to 11.6937, with R2 rising to 0.9929. After variable selection, RMSE and MAE further reduced to 0.00907 and 9.9697, with R2 increasing to 0.9983. After ERIME optimization, the ECLMA model outperformed traditional models, reducing RMSE and MAE by up to 91.55% and 84.94%, respectively, compared to CNN, and by 85.91% and 69.47%, respectively, compared to LSTM. These results confirm the model's superior accuracy and stability.

基于erime优化cnn - lstm多头关注的燃煤电厂CO2捕集预测控制
由于复杂的操作条件和多变量相互作用,预测燃烧后碳捕集(PCC)系统中的二氧化碳浓度具有挑战性。本研究提出了一种基于增强RIME算法(ERIME)优化的卷积神经网络(CNN)长短期记忆(LSTM)-多头注意(ECLMA)模型来提高预测精度。采用局部离群因子(LOF)算法去除噪声,互信息(MI)算法确定时间滞后,平滑裁剪绝对偏差(SCAD)算法优化特征选择。cnn - lstm -多头注意力模型从时间序列数据中提取有意义的特征,并使用ERIME算法对参数进行优化。利用某600 MW超临界燃煤电厂的模拟数据,结果表明,去除LOF异常值后,均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)提高了10% ~ 13%。mi后延迟重建RMSE降至0.00999,MAE降至11.6937,R2上升至0.9929。变量选择后,RMSE和MAE进一步减小到0.00907和9.9697,R2增大到0.9983。经过ERIME优化后,ECLMA模型优于传统模型,与CNN相比RMSE和MAE分别降低了91.55%和84.94%,与LSTM相比分别降低了85.91%和69.47%。这些结果证实了该模型具有良好的精度和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信