Tumor Regression Grade as a Predictor of Adjuvant Therapy Benefits in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.1002/cam4.71166
Yizhou Huang, Maohui Chen, Yuanpu Wei, Bingqiang Cai, Yongcong Zhang, Chuanquan Lin, Shuliang Zhang, Taidui Zeng, Chun Chen, Bin Zheng
{"title":"Tumor Regression Grade as a Predictor of Adjuvant Therapy Benefits in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy","authors":"Yizhou Huang,&nbsp;Maohui Chen,&nbsp;Yuanpu Wei,&nbsp;Bingqiang Cai,&nbsp;Yongcong Zhang,&nbsp;Chuanquan Lin,&nbsp;Shuliang Zhang,&nbsp;Taidui Zeng,&nbsp;Chun Chen,&nbsp;Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is preferred for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the necessity of adjuvant therapy remains controversial. Tumor regression grade (TRG) reflects the response to neoadjuvant therapy and may predict patient prognosis, yet its role in guiding adjuvant therapy remains unexplored. This study aimed to explore the role of TRG and other clinical characteristics in predicting the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included patients who underwent R0 esophagectomy for thoracic ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy between January 2016 and December 2021 across three high-volume centers. Patients were assessed by TRG and divided into good responders (TRG 0–1) and poor responders (TRG 2–3).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 416 patients with a median follow-up of 52 months, adjuvant therapy extended median survival by 8 months, which was statistically insignificant (<i>p</i> = 0.28). In the TRG 0–1 subgroup, those receiving adjuvant therapy had 3-year and 5-year OS rates of 94.6% and 86.8%, compared to 78.8% and 71.6% for the observation group (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Multivariable Cox regression showed adjuvant therapy was associated with reduced mortality in the TRG 0–1 (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14–0.73; <i>p</i> = 0.006), positive lymph nodes (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36–0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.001), and ypT3-4 subgroups (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43–0.92; <i>p</i> = 0.017).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>TRG is a promising predictor of the prognostic value of adjuvant therapy in ESCC patients. Patients with a good TRG response, positive lymph nodes, and ypT3-4 stage benefit from adjuvant therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is preferred for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the necessity of adjuvant therapy remains controversial. Tumor regression grade (TRG) reflects the response to neoadjuvant therapy and may predict patient prognosis, yet its role in guiding adjuvant therapy remains unexplored. This study aimed to explore the role of TRG and other clinical characteristics in predicting the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

This study included patients who underwent R0 esophagectomy for thoracic ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy between January 2016 and December 2021 across three high-volume centers. Patients were assessed by TRG and divided into good responders (TRG 0–1) and poor responders (TRG 2–3).

Results

Among 416 patients with a median follow-up of 52 months, adjuvant therapy extended median survival by 8 months, which was statistically insignificant (p = 0.28). In the TRG 0–1 subgroup, those receiving adjuvant therapy had 3-year and 5-year OS rates of 94.6% and 86.8%, compared to 78.8% and 71.6% for the observation group (p = 0.02). Multivariable Cox regression showed adjuvant therapy was associated with reduced mortality in the TRG 0–1 (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14–0.73; p = 0.006), positive lymph nodes (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36–0.78; p = 0.001), and ypT3-4 subgroups (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43–0.92; p = 0.017).

Conclusions

TRG is a promising predictor of the prognostic value of adjuvant therapy in ESCC patients. Patients with a good TRG response, positive lymph nodes, and ypT3-4 stage benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Abstract Image

肿瘤消退等级作为食管癌患者新辅助治疗后辅助治疗效果的预测因子
背景:对于局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC),手术后新辅助治疗是首选,但辅助治疗的必要性仍存在争议。肿瘤消退等级(Tumor regression grade, TRG)反映了对新辅助治疗的反应,可以预测患者的预后,但其在指导辅助治疗中的作用尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨TRG等临床特征对ESCC患者接受新辅助治疗后辅助治疗效果的预测作用。该研究纳入了2016年1月至2021年12月期间在三个大容量中心接受新辅助治疗后接受R0食管切除术的胸部ESCC患者。采用TRG对患者进行评估,分为良好反应者(TRG 0-1)和不良反应者(TRG 2-3)。结果416例患者中位随访52个月,辅助治疗使中位生存期延长8个月,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.28)。在TRG 0-1亚组中,接受辅助治疗的3年和5年OS分别为94.6%和86.8%,而观察组为78.8%和71.6% (p = 0.02)。多变量Cox回归显示,辅助治疗与TRG 0-1亚组(HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14-0.73; p = 0.006)、淋巴结阳性(HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36-0.78; p = 0.001)和ypT3-4亚组(HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.92; p = 0.017)的死亡率降低相关。结论TRG是预测ESCC患者辅助治疗预后的良好指标。TRG反应良好、淋巴结阳性和ypT3-4期的患者可从辅助治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信