Understanding Chinese Consumers' Participation in Automobile Recalls for Environmental Defects: Applying the Protective Action Decision Model and Norm Activation Model

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Ruiju Yang, Yan Zhang, Hong Huang
{"title":"Understanding Chinese Consumers' Participation in Automobile Recalls for Environmental Defects: Applying the Protective Action Decision Model and Norm Activation Model","authors":"Ruiju Yang,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Hong Huang","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Automobile recalls for environmental defects (ARED) are proposed as an environmental policy in China to address automobile emission pollution by repairing environmental defects. Given the critical role of consumer engagement in achieving a high rate of recall completion, understanding consumer behavioural responses to ARED becomes paramount for policy efficacy. This study constructs a theoretical framework by integrating the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) and the Norm Activation Model (NAM) to elucidate the psychological decision-making mechanisms underlying consumer participation in ARED. This study also incorporates self-efficacy as a moderating variable to examine differences in consumers' behavioural responses between high and low self-efficacy groups. Using 1080 survey responses in China, structural equation models were employed to quantify the impacts of the proposed determinants on consumers' participation intention. The main results shows that personal norms, awareness of consequences, ascription of responsibility, and automobile emission knowledge significantly enhance consumers' participation intention. Personal norms are shaped by awareness of consequences, while both awareness of consequences and ascription of responsibility are influenced by risk perception and automobile emission knowledge. Moreover, the multi-group path analysis reveals that these relationships vary across different levels of self-efficacy. This study advances the theoretical understanding of consumers' participation intention, and offers valuable insights for regulators and firms in optimising recall communication and implementation strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automobile recalls for environmental defects (ARED) are proposed as an environmental policy in China to address automobile emission pollution by repairing environmental defects. Given the critical role of consumer engagement in achieving a high rate of recall completion, understanding consumer behavioural responses to ARED becomes paramount for policy efficacy. This study constructs a theoretical framework by integrating the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) and the Norm Activation Model (NAM) to elucidate the psychological decision-making mechanisms underlying consumer participation in ARED. This study also incorporates self-efficacy as a moderating variable to examine differences in consumers' behavioural responses between high and low self-efficacy groups. Using 1080 survey responses in China, structural equation models were employed to quantify the impacts of the proposed determinants on consumers' participation intention. The main results shows that personal norms, awareness of consequences, ascription of responsibility, and automobile emission knowledge significantly enhance consumers' participation intention. Personal norms are shaped by awareness of consequences, while both awareness of consequences and ascription of responsibility are influenced by risk perception and automobile emission knowledge. Moreover, the multi-group path analysis reveals that these relationships vary across different levels of self-efficacy. This study advances the theoretical understanding of consumers' participation intention, and offers valuable insights for regulators and firms in optimising recall communication and implementation strategies.

基于保护行为决策模型和规范激活模型的中国消费者环境缺陷汽车召回参与研究
汽车环境缺陷召回(ARED)是中国提出的一项通过修复环境缺陷来解决汽车排放污染的环境政策。鉴于消费者参与在实现高召回完成率方面的关键作用,了解消费者对召回的行为反应对政策效力至关重要。本研究通过整合保护行为决策模型(PADM)和规范激活模型(NAM),构建了一个理论框架,以阐明消费者参与紧急救援的心理决策机制。本研究还将自我效能作为调节变量,考察了高、低自我效能组消费者行为反应的差异。本文利用中国1080份调查问卷的反馈,采用结构方程模型来量化所提出的决定因素对消费者参与意愿的影响。主要结果表明,个人规范、后果意识、责任归属和汽车排放知识显著增强了消费者的参与意愿。个人规范受后果意识的影响,而后果意识和责任归属均受风险认知和汽车排放知识的影响。此外,多群体路径分析显示,这些关系在不同水平的自我效能感中存在差异。本研究促进了对消费者参与意愿的理论认识,并为监管机构和企业优化召回沟通和实施策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信