Predicting microbially mediated plant coexistence is sensitive to vital rate identity and soil conditioning history

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70205
Petr Dostál
{"title":"Predicting microbially mediated plant coexistence is sensitive to vital rate identity and soil conditioning history","authors":"Petr Dostál","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the mechanisms that maintain the coexistence of plant species is critical to addressing the global biodiversity crisis. Increasing attention has been paid to interactions between plants and soil microbes (plant–soil feedback, PSF), which can not only promote plant coexistence by increasing stabilizing effects but also hinder it by generating competitive fitness differences. However, the predictive power of the PSF has been questioned in recent studies because estimates of microbially mediated coexistence have correlated poorly with the outcomes of plant interactions observed in the field. This discrepancy may be due to the approaches typically used in PSF research, such as measuring PSF effects on a single vital rate or using soil conditioned for a short time period and without considering abiotic contexts. Here, I examined the effects of soil inoculum with different training histories and training environments (with and without added nutrients) on germination, seedling survival, and biomass of four grassland species. I then examined whether predictions of microbially mediated coexistence of four species pairs were sensitive to the vital rate identity, conditioning history, and soil training environment. I found that conspecific inoculum trained for longer had increasingly positive and negative effects on germination and biomass, respectively, although the effects of inoculum history varied across species and training environments. Estimates of microbially mediated outcomes were directly related to the vital rate used: when based on biomass and seedling survival, all four pairs were predicted to coexist, but only two pairs could do so when based on germination due to much reduced or even negative stabilization. Although coexistence predictions were not significantly related to conditioning history (including the effects of both variable conditioning durations and combinations of conditioning species) or nutrient treatments, both factors had a significant effect on stabilization. These results suggest that predictions of microbially mediated coexistence may be biased when based on a single vital rate, such as plant growth. To obtain more realistic and accurate outcome estimates, PSF effects should be integrated across different life stages, considering the temporal and abiotic contexts of these effects specific to a focal study system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that maintain the coexistence of plant species is critical to addressing the global biodiversity crisis. Increasing attention has been paid to interactions between plants and soil microbes (plant–soil feedback, PSF), which can not only promote plant coexistence by increasing stabilizing effects but also hinder it by generating competitive fitness differences. However, the predictive power of the PSF has been questioned in recent studies because estimates of microbially mediated coexistence have correlated poorly with the outcomes of plant interactions observed in the field. This discrepancy may be due to the approaches typically used in PSF research, such as measuring PSF effects on a single vital rate or using soil conditioned for a short time period and without considering abiotic contexts. Here, I examined the effects of soil inoculum with different training histories and training environments (with and without added nutrients) on germination, seedling survival, and biomass of four grassland species. I then examined whether predictions of microbially mediated coexistence of four species pairs were sensitive to the vital rate identity, conditioning history, and soil training environment. I found that conspecific inoculum trained for longer had increasingly positive and negative effects on germination and biomass, respectively, although the effects of inoculum history varied across species and training environments. Estimates of microbially mediated outcomes were directly related to the vital rate used: when based on biomass and seedling survival, all four pairs were predicted to coexist, but only two pairs could do so when based on germination due to much reduced or even negative stabilization. Although coexistence predictions were not significantly related to conditioning history (including the effects of both variable conditioning durations and combinations of conditioning species) or nutrient treatments, both factors had a significant effect on stabilization. These results suggest that predictions of microbially mediated coexistence may be biased when based on a single vital rate, such as plant growth. To obtain more realistic and accurate outcome estimates, PSF effects should be integrated across different life stages, considering the temporal and abiotic contexts of these effects specific to a focal study system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测微生物介导的植物共存对生命速率特性和土壤调节历史敏感
了解维持植物物种共存的机制对于解决全球生物多样性危机至关重要。植物与土壤微生物之间的相互作用(植物-土壤反馈,plant - soil feedback, PSF)越来越受到人们的关注,这种相互作用既可以通过增加稳定效应来促进植物共存,也可以通过产生竞争适应度差异来阻碍植物共存。然而,PSF的预测能力在最近的研究中受到质疑,因为微生物介导的共存估计与田间观察到的植物相互作用的结果相关性很差。这种差异可能是由于PSF研究中通常使用的方法,例如测量PSF对单个生命速率的影响,或使用短时间条件下的土壤,而不考虑非生物环境。在此,我研究了不同训练历史和不同训练环境(添加和不添加营养物)的土壤接种对四种草地物种的萌发、幼苗存活率和生物量的影响。然后,我研究了微生物介导的四种物种对共存的预测是否对生命速率特性、调节历史和土壤训练环境敏感。我发现,尽管接种史的影响在不同物种和不同训练环境中有所不同,但同种接种时间越长,对种子萌发和生物量的积极影响和消极影响越明显。微生物介导结果的估计与所使用的生命率直接相关:当基于生物量和幼苗存活率时,所有四对都被预测共存,但当基于发芽率时,由于大大降低甚至是负稳定,只有两对可以共存。尽管共存预测与调节历史(包括可变调节时间和调节物种组合的影响)或营养处理没有显著相关性,但这两个因素对稳定性都有显著影响。这些结果表明,当基于单一的生命速率(如植物生长)时,微生物介导的共存预测可能存在偏差。为了获得更现实和准确的结果估计,应该综合不同生命阶段的PSF效应,考虑到这些效应特定于重点研究系统的时间和非生物背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信