On the Numerical Evaluation of Wall Shear Stress Using the Finite Element Method

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jana Brunátová, Jørgen S. Dokken, Kristian Valen-Sendstad, Jaroslav Hron
{"title":"On the Numerical Evaluation of Wall Shear Stress Using the Finite Element Method","authors":"Jana Brunátová,&nbsp;Jørgen S. Dokken,&nbsp;Kristian Valen-Sendstad,&nbsp;Jaroslav Hron","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wall shear stress (WSS) is a crucial hemodynamic quantity extensively studied in cardiovascular research, yet its numerical computation is not straightforward. This work compares WSS results obtained from two different finite element discretizations, quantifies the differences between continuous and discontinuous stresses, and introduces a modified variationally consistent method for WSS evaluation through the formulation of a boundary-flux problem. Two benchmark problems are considered: a 2D Stokes flow on a unit square and a 3D Poiseuille flow through a cylindrical pipe. These are followed by investigations of steady-state Navier–Stokes flow in two image-based, patient-specific aneurysms. The study focuses on P1/P1 stabilized and Taylor–Hood P2/P1 mixed finite elements for velocity and pressure. WSS is computed using either the proposed boundary-flux method or as a projection of tangential traction onto first order Lagrange (P1), discontinuous Galerkin first order (DG-1), or discontinuous Galerkin zero order (DG-0) space. For the P1/P1 stabilized element, the boundary-flux and P1 projection methods yielded equivalent results. With the P2/P1 element, the boundary-flux evaluation demonstrated faster convergence in the Poiseuille flow example but showed increased sensitivity to pressure field inaccuracies in image-based geometries compared to the projection method. Furthermore, a paradoxical degradation in WSS accuracy was observed when combining the P2/P1 element with fine boundary-layer meshes on a cylindrical geometry, an effect attributed to inherent geometric approximation errors. In aneurysm geometries, the P2/P1 element exhibited superior robustness to mesh size when evaluating average WSS and low shear area (LSA), outperforming the P1/P1 stabilized element. Projecting discontinuous finite element functions into continuous spaces can introduce artifacts, such as the Gibbs phenomenon. Consequently, it is crucial to carefully select the finite element space for boundary stress calculations, not only in applications involving WSS computations for aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wall shear stress (WSS) is a crucial hemodynamic quantity extensively studied in cardiovascular research, yet its numerical computation is not straightforward. This work compares WSS results obtained from two different finite element discretizations, quantifies the differences between continuous and discontinuous stresses, and introduces a modified variationally consistent method for WSS evaluation through the formulation of a boundary-flux problem. Two benchmark problems are considered: a 2D Stokes flow on a unit square and a 3D Poiseuille flow through a cylindrical pipe. These are followed by investigations of steady-state Navier–Stokes flow in two image-based, patient-specific aneurysms. The study focuses on P1/P1 stabilized and Taylor–Hood P2/P1 mixed finite elements for velocity and pressure. WSS is computed using either the proposed boundary-flux method or as a projection of tangential traction onto first order Lagrange (P1), discontinuous Galerkin first order (DG-1), or discontinuous Galerkin zero order (DG-0) space. For the P1/P1 stabilized element, the boundary-flux and P1 projection methods yielded equivalent results. With the P2/P1 element, the boundary-flux evaluation demonstrated faster convergence in the Poiseuille flow example but showed increased sensitivity to pressure field inaccuracies in image-based geometries compared to the projection method. Furthermore, a paradoxical degradation in WSS accuracy was observed when combining the P2/P1 element with fine boundary-layer meshes on a cylindrical geometry, an effect attributed to inherent geometric approximation errors. In aneurysm geometries, the P2/P1 element exhibited superior robustness to mesh size when evaluating average WSS and low shear area (LSA), outperforming the P1/P1 stabilized element. Projecting discontinuous finite element functions into continuous spaces can introduce artifacts, such as the Gibbs phenomenon. Consequently, it is crucial to carefully select the finite element space for boundary stress calculations, not only in applications involving WSS computations for aneurysms.

Abstract Image

基于有限元法的墙体剪应力数值计算
壁面剪切应力(Wall shear stress, WSS)是心血管研究中一个重要的血流动力学量,但其数值计算并不简单。本文比较了两种不同的有限元离散得到的WSS结果,量化了连续和不连续应力之间的差异,并通过边界通量问题的形式引入了一种改进的变分一致方法来评估WSS。考虑了两个基准问题:单位正方形上的二维斯托克斯流和通过圆柱形管道的三维泊泽维尔流。接下来是对两个基于图像的患者特异性动脉瘤的稳态Navier-Stokes流的研究。研究重点是P1/P1稳定有限元和Taylor-Hood P2/P1混合有限元的速度和压力。WSS可以使用所提出的边界通量法或作为切向牵引在一阶拉格朗日(P1)、不连续Galerkin一阶(DG-1)或不连续Galerkin零阶(DG-0)空间上的投影来计算。对于P1/P1稳定单元,边界通量法和P1投影法得到了等效的结果。使用P2/P1单元时,边界通量评估在泊泽维尔流示例中显示出更快的收敛速度,但与投影方法相比,在基于图像的几何中对压力场不准确性的敏感性增加。此外,当将P2/P1单元与圆柱几何体上的精细边界层网格结合时,观察到WSS精度的矛盾退化,这归因于固有的几何近似误差。在动脉瘤几何形状中,当评估平均WSS和低剪切面积(LSA)时,P2/P1元件对网格尺寸的稳稳性优于P1/P1稳定元件。将不连续的有限元函数投射到连续空间中可能会引入伪影,比如吉布斯现象。因此,不仅在涉及动脉瘤WSS计算的应用中,仔细选择边界应力计算的有限元空间是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信