Bioequivalence of a Metformin/Linagliptin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Compared With Coadministered Single Extended-Release Agents in Healthy Adult Subjects
{"title":"Bioequivalence of a Metformin/Linagliptin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Compared With Coadministered Single Extended-Release Agents in Healthy Adult Subjects","authors":"Woo-Young Shin","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/7111508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aim:</b> We aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of metformin 1000 mg and linagliptin 5 mg compared with the coadministration of their respective extended-release (XR) single tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This randomized, open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study included 64 healthy Korean adults. The participants received a single dose of the FDC tablet or the individual XR tablets of metformin and linagliptin, with a 49 days washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected over a 72-h period to measure the pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>). The safety and tolerability were also assessed.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Our pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the AUC and <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> for both metformin and linagliptin in the FDC tablet were within the bioequivalence range of 80%–125% compared with those of the individual XR tablets. Specifically, the geometric mean ratios (FDC to coadministration) for metformin were 101.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 97.8–104.5) for AUC and 97.6% (95% CI: 94.5–100.9) for <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and those for linagliptin were 98.4% (95% CI: 95.7–101.2) for AUC and 96.7% (95% CI: 93.9–99.5) for <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and both treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The metformin/linagliptin 1000 mg/5 mg FDC tablet is bioequivalent to coadministration of individual XR tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions. The FDC tablet was well tolerated, indicating that it is a safe and effective option that could improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7111508","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7111508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of metformin 1000 mg and linagliptin 5 mg compared with the coadministration of their respective extended-release (XR) single tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions.
Methods: This randomized, open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study included 64 healthy Korean adults. The participants received a single dose of the FDC tablet or the individual XR tablets of metformin and linagliptin, with a 49 days washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected over a 72-h period to measure the pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax). The safety and tolerability were also assessed.
Results: Our pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the AUC and Cmax for both metformin and linagliptin in the FDC tablet were within the bioequivalence range of 80%–125% compared with those of the individual XR tablets. Specifically, the geometric mean ratios (FDC to coadministration) for metformin were 101.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 97.8–104.5) for AUC and 97.6% (95% CI: 94.5–100.9) for Cmax and those for linagliptin were 98.4% (95% CI: 95.7–101.2) for AUC and 96.7% (95% CI: 93.9–99.5) for Cmax. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and both treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusion: The metformin/linagliptin 1000 mg/5 mg FDC tablet is bioequivalent to coadministration of individual XR tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions. The FDC tablet was well tolerated, indicating that it is a safe and effective option that could improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.