Bioequivalence of a Metformin/Linagliptin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Compared With Coadministered Single Extended-Release Agents in Healthy Adult Subjects

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Woo-Young Shin
{"title":"Bioequivalence of a Metformin/Linagliptin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Compared With Coadministered Single Extended-Release Agents in Healthy Adult Subjects","authors":"Woo-Young Shin","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/7111508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aim:</b> We aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of metformin 1000 mg and linagliptin 5 mg compared with the coadministration of their respective extended-release (XR) single tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This randomized, open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study included 64 healthy Korean adults. The participants received a single dose of the FDC tablet or the individual XR tablets of metformin and linagliptin, with a 49 days washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected over a 72-h period to measure the pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>). The safety and tolerability were also assessed.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Our pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the AUC and <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> for both metformin and linagliptin in the FDC tablet were within the bioequivalence range of 80%–125% compared with those of the individual XR tablets. Specifically, the geometric mean ratios (FDC to coadministration) for metformin were 101.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 97.8–104.5) for AUC and 97.6% (95% CI: 94.5–100.9) for <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and those for linagliptin were 98.4% (95% CI: 95.7–101.2) for AUC and 96.7% (95% CI: 93.9–99.5) for <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and both treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The metformin/linagliptin 1000 mg/5 mg FDC tablet is bioequivalent to coadministration of individual XR tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions. The FDC tablet was well tolerated, indicating that it is a safe and effective option that could improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7111508","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7111508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of metformin 1000 mg and linagliptin 5 mg compared with the coadministration of their respective extended-release (XR) single tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions.

Methods: This randomized, open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study included 64 healthy Korean adults. The participants received a single dose of the FDC tablet or the individual XR tablets of metformin and linagliptin, with a 49 days washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected over a 72-h period to measure the pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax). The safety and tolerability were also assessed.

Results: Our pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the AUC and Cmax for both metformin and linagliptin in the FDC tablet were within the bioequivalence range of 80%–125% compared with those of the individual XR tablets. Specifically, the geometric mean ratios (FDC to coadministration) for metformin were 101.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 97.8–104.5) for AUC and 97.6% (95% CI: 94.5–100.9) for Cmax and those for linagliptin were 98.4% (95% CI: 95.7–101.2) for AUC and 96.7% (95% CI: 93.9–99.5) for Cmax. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusion: The metformin/linagliptin 1000 mg/5 mg FDC tablet is bioequivalent to coadministration of individual XR tablets in healthy Korean adults under fasting conditions. The FDC tablet was well tolerated, indicating that it is a safe and effective option that could improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Abstract Image

二甲双胍/利格列汀固定剂量联合片与单药缓释剂在健康成人体内的生物等效性比较
目的:我们旨在证明二甲双胍1000 mg和利格列汀5 mg的固定剂量联合片(FDC)与各自的缓释(XR)单片共同给药在韩国健康成人禁食条件下的生物等效性。方法:这项随机、开放标签、两序列、两期交叉研究纳入了64名健康的韩国成年人。参与者接受单剂量的FDC片或二甲双胍和利格列汀的单独XR片,两次治疗之间有49天的洗脱期。取血72h,测定药动学参数,包括曲线下面积(AUC)和最大浓度(Cmax)。安全性和耐受性也进行了评估。结果:药动学分析表明,与XR单片相比,FDC片中二甲双胍和利格列汀的AUC和Cmax均在80% ~ 125%的生物等效性范围内。具体来说,二甲双胍的AUC和Cmax的几何平均比(FDC与共给药比)分别为101.1%(95%置信区间(CI): 97.8-104.5)和97.6% (95% CI: 94.5-100.9),利格列汀的AUC和Cmax的几何平均比分别为98.4% (95% CI: 95.7-101.2)和96.7% (95% CI: 93.9-99.5)。无严重不良事件(ae)报告,两种治疗均耐受良好。结论:在韩国健康成人空腹条件下,二甲双胍/利格列汀1000mg / 5mg FDC片与XR片单用生物等效。FDC片耐受性良好,表明它是一种安全有效的选择,可以改善2型糖尿病患者的药物依从性和治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信